Started By
Message

Oh oh, Rystad Energy spokesman: U.S.-Iran Re-Escalation Could Drive Oil To $180 By August

Posted on 6/1/26 at 12:46 pm
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
29308 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 12:46 pm
quote:

An acute re-escalation in the U.S.-Iran conflict and a prolonged blockage of the Strait of Hormuz could drive global crude oil prices to $180 per barrel by August, Jorge León, Head of Geopolitical Analysis at Rystad Energy, has projected on CNBC's Squawk Box Europe.

According to Rystad's León, this extreme bull-case scenario would materialize in the form of prolonged military strikes, physical damage to infrastructure or full Strait of Hormuz blockade. León says that whereas recent de-escalation talks and temporary ceasefires dropped Brent and WTI crude to the $85-$90 range, physical supply vulnerabilities remain highly elevated.

León estimates that it would take six to eight weeks for transit insurance markets to reprice, vessel operators to secure access and physical oil flows to normalize after a diplomatic resolution is reached, implying that any meaningful supply recoveries from any current structured pauses will not fully materialize at processing ports until late summer.

Rystad regards the current scenario as a middle of the road case, with the market pricing in short-term ceasefires, active diplomatic mediation going on and high operational uncertainty. However, León considers a de-escalation the bearish case for oil markets wherein a successful 30-day peace framework negotiation, gradual reopening of shipping lanes and returning Iranian crude would push oil prices down to the $70-80/bbl range.

Rystad is not alone. Back in March, Saudi Arabia warned that the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz could drive oil prices up to $180 per barrel while several Wall Street analysts, including BNP Paribas, have projected oil prices in the $170-200/bbl range.

In contrast, Goldman Sachs commodity analysts on Monday projected that rapid demand destruction caused by high crude prices is heavily countering the risk of severe Middle East supply shocks. Goldman says that while geopolitical tensions and the prolonged closure of the Strait of Hormuz have triggered massive physical supply deficits, actual consumption has dropped much faster than anticipated, capping the potential upside for global oil prices.


LINK

My unprofessional opinion is the same as when these types of "warnings" were made back in April. We hit demand destruction before $150/bbl oil.
Posted by ThatTahoeOverThere
Member since Nov 2021
5009 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 12:49 pm to
Israel needs to quit fricking up the deal
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
182780 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 12:50 pm to
Surely this thread will come true like all of the 1000 threads you have posted since we started bombing Iran


Posted by Chuck Barris
Member since Apr 2013
3247 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

Israel needs to quit fricking up the deal
Why would they do that? This whole war is about their security against Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran. What is anyone going to do about it if they decide to take over three-quarters of Lebanon, write a strongly-worded tweet?
Posted by SlidellCajun
Slidell la
Member since May 2019
16440 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

Why would they do that? This whole war is about their security against Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran.


We were the ones that started this war with Iran, not Israel .

Posted by Tigerfan1274
Member since May 2019
4704 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 12:57 pm to
quote:

deal


Posted by CocomoLSU
Inside your dome.
Member since Feb 2004
156738 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

ragincajun03

I've never known someone who's literal hobby is "gas/gas prices."

But I guess I sort of e-know one.

Your obsession with this is almost impressive.
This post was edited on 6/1/26 at 1:26 pm
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
123150 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 1:00 pm to
I’d gladly pay $6 a gallon if it means I could sleep peacefully knowing Iranian boots won’t be on my neck.
Posted by shrapnel
Member since May 2026
57 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 1:01 pm to
quote:

I've never known someone who's literally hobby is "gas/gas prices."


Everyone of these is just a subtle dig at this administration.
Posted by redstick13
Lower Saxony
Member since Feb 2007
40896 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 1:02 pm to
Has Rystad ever predicted something remotely accurate?
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86325 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

Everyone of these is just a subtle dig at this administration.


Posted by Breauxsif
Member since May 2012
22552 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 1:03 pm to
The $180 projection by August is no longer just a hypothetical situation. Summer demand will exacerbate this with the straight of Hormuz closure.
Posted by Bunk Moreland
Member since Dec 2010
68788 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 1:05 pm to
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
29308 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 1:07 pm to
quote:

Has Rystad ever predicted something remotely accurate?


Now that's a valid question.

Or...do they put out stuff intentionally trying to move the market one way or the other?

I buy the point that a real, prolonged closing of the strait would cause prices to rise, but $180 seems crazy far-fetched. That's just about double today's prices.
Posted by Chuck Barris
Member since Apr 2013
3247 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

We were the ones that started this war with Iran, not Israel .
This isn't a partisan thing. Everyone agrees that the decision to enter this war stems from Netanyahu and Trump's meeting in the Situation Room earlier this year. Everyone, left and right, agrees that the USA and Israel collaborated on placing our opening strikes, like the ones that killed the previous ayatollah. Everyone agrees that this is a two front war, with one front in Lebanon and Gaza and the other front in Iran. None of this is controversial.

Even if your earlier statement was correct, what would it change about my point?
Posted by Tridentds
Sugar Land
Member since Aug 2011
23989 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 1:13 pm to
I've heard it could cost thousands to fill up a car if things heat up in Iran again .

Really no end in sight in terms of how high it can go. We are all doomed to ride bikes I tell you.
Posted by mikie421
continental shelf
Member since Nov 2008
861 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

I buy the point that a real, prolonged closing of the strait would cause prices to rise, but $180 seems crazy far-fetched. That's just about double today's prices.


That’s just the paper price. Physical prices have been much higher than paper. Closer to $130-150 in some places. So $180 isn’t that far fetched.
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
24939 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:40 pm to
It could. It also could be a very short lived “re-escalation” that has almost no impact on prices.

I’m going to hold onto my July contracts (I think). It’s tempting to exit because they are so far in the money right now but htm with them is the better play I hope.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
41171 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:44 pm to
quote:

We hit demand destruction before $150/bbl oil.


Yup.
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
29308 posts
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

That’s just the paper price. Physical prices have been much higher than paper. Closer to $130-150 in some places.


I’m aware of countries playing premiums at times since March that are in that range.

But I guess I ASSume when the price of oil is discussed in this context, folks are talking about the paper price you see by Googling “Brent oil price”.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram