- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Oh oh, Rystad Energy spokesman: U.S.-Iran Re-Escalation Could Drive Oil To $180 By August
Posted on 6/1/26 at 12:46 pm
Posted on 6/1/26 at 12:46 pm
quote:
An acute re-escalation in the U.S.-Iran conflict and a prolonged blockage of the Strait of Hormuz could drive global crude oil prices to $180 per barrel by August, Jorge León, Head of Geopolitical Analysis at Rystad Energy, has projected on CNBC's Squawk Box Europe.
According to Rystad's León, this extreme bull-case scenario would materialize in the form of prolonged military strikes, physical damage to infrastructure or full Strait of Hormuz blockade. León says that whereas recent de-escalation talks and temporary ceasefires dropped Brent and WTI crude to the $85-$90 range, physical supply vulnerabilities remain highly elevated.
León estimates that it would take six to eight weeks for transit insurance markets to reprice, vessel operators to secure access and physical oil flows to normalize after a diplomatic resolution is reached, implying that any meaningful supply recoveries from any current structured pauses will not fully materialize at processing ports until late summer.
Rystad regards the current scenario as a middle of the road case, with the market pricing in short-term ceasefires, active diplomatic mediation going on and high operational uncertainty. However, León considers a de-escalation the bearish case for oil markets wherein a successful 30-day peace framework negotiation, gradual reopening of shipping lanes and returning Iranian crude would push oil prices down to the $70-80/bbl range.
Rystad is not alone. Back in March, Saudi Arabia warned that the effective closure of the Strait of Hormuz could drive oil prices up to $180 per barrel while several Wall Street analysts, including BNP Paribas, have projected oil prices in the $170-200/bbl range.
In contrast, Goldman Sachs commodity analysts on Monday projected that rapid demand destruction caused by high crude prices is heavily countering the risk of severe Middle East supply shocks. Goldman says that while geopolitical tensions and the prolonged closure of the Strait of Hormuz have triggered massive physical supply deficits, actual consumption has dropped much faster than anticipated, capping the potential upside for global oil prices.
LINK
My unprofessional opinion is the same as when these types of "warnings" were made back in April. We hit demand destruction before $150/bbl oil.
Posted on 6/1/26 at 12:49 pm to ragincajun03
Israel needs to quit fricking up the deal
Posted on 6/1/26 at 12:50 pm to ragincajun03
Surely this thread will come true like all of the 1000 threads you have posted since we started bombing Iran
Posted on 6/1/26 at 12:53 pm to ThatTahoeOverThere
quote:Why would they do that? This whole war is about their security against Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran. What is anyone going to do about it if they decide to take over three-quarters of Lebanon, write a strongly-worded tweet?
Israel needs to quit fricking up the deal
Posted on 6/1/26 at 12:56 pm to Chuck Barris
quote:
Why would they do that? This whole war is about their security against Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran.
We were the ones that started this war with Iran, not Israel .
Posted on 6/1/26 at 12:59 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
ragincajun03
I've never known someone who's literal hobby is "gas/gas prices."
But I guess I sort of e-know one.
Your obsession with this is almost impressive.
This post was edited on 6/1/26 at 1:26 pm
Posted on 6/1/26 at 1:00 pm to ThatTahoeOverThere
I’d gladly pay $6 a gallon if it means I could sleep peacefully knowing Iranian boots won’t be on my neck.
Posted on 6/1/26 at 1:01 pm to CocomoLSU
quote:
I've never known someone who's literally hobby is "gas/gas prices."
Everyone of these is just a subtle dig at this administration.
Posted on 6/1/26 at 1:02 pm to ragincajun03
Has Rystad ever predicted something remotely accurate?
Posted on 6/1/26 at 1:02 pm to shrapnel
quote:
Everyone of these is just a subtle dig at this administration.
Posted on 6/1/26 at 1:03 pm to ragincajun03
The $180 projection by August is no longer just a hypothetical situation. Summer demand will exacerbate this with the straight of Hormuz closure.
Posted on 6/1/26 at 1:07 pm to redstick13
quote:
Has Rystad ever predicted something remotely accurate?
Now that's a valid question.
Or...do they put out stuff intentionally trying to move the market one way or the other?
I buy the point that a real, prolonged closing of the strait would cause prices to rise, but $180 seems crazy far-fetched. That's just about double today's prices.
Posted on 6/1/26 at 1:11 pm to SlidellCajun
quote:This isn't a partisan thing. Everyone agrees that the decision to enter this war stems from Netanyahu and Trump's meeting in the Situation Room earlier this year. Everyone, left and right, agrees that the USA and Israel collaborated on placing our opening strikes, like the ones that killed the previous ayatollah. Everyone agrees that this is a two front war, with one front in Lebanon and Gaza and the other front in Iran. None of this is controversial.
We were the ones that started this war with Iran, not Israel .
Even if your earlier statement was correct, what would it change about my point?
Posted on 6/1/26 at 1:13 pm to ragincajun03
I've heard it could cost thousands to fill up a car if things heat up in Iran again .
Really no end in sight in terms of how high it can go. We are all doomed to ride bikes I tell you.
Really no end in sight in terms of how high it can go. We are all doomed to ride bikes I tell you.
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:14 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
I buy the point that a real, prolonged closing of the strait would cause prices to rise, but $180 seems crazy far-fetched. That's just about double today's prices.
That’s just the paper price. Physical prices have been much higher than paper. Closer to $130-150 in some places. So $180 isn’t that far fetched.
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:40 pm to ragincajun03
It could. It also could be a very short lived “re-escalation” that has almost no impact on prices.
I’m going to hold onto my July contracts (I think). It’s tempting to exit because they are so far in the money right now but htm with them is the better play I hope.
I’m going to hold onto my July contracts (I think). It’s tempting to exit because they are so far in the money right now but htm with them is the better play I hope.
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:44 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
We hit demand destruction before $150/bbl oil.
Yup.
Posted on 6/1/26 at 3:51 pm to mikie421
quote:
That’s just the paper price. Physical prices have been much higher than paper. Closer to $130-150 in some places.
I’m aware of countries playing premiums at times since March that are in that range.
But I guess I ASSume when the price of oil is discussed in this context, folks are talking about the paper price you see by Googling “Brent oil price”.
Popular
Back to top

8










