Started By
Message

re: NYPD releases James Blake video

Posted on 9/11/15 at 4:41 pm to
Posted by Breesus
Unplug
Member since Jan 2010
69549 posts
Posted on 9/11/15 at 4:41 pm to
quote:

rst of all, he didn't take down the suspect until the suspect started resisting.


He sprinted into the guy and slammed him down. Where do you see a part in that video when he wasn't in the act of taking the guy down?

quote:

re is no evidence to suggest the officer did not identify himself other than Blake's assertion.


You think he yelled "hey I'm a police officer here I come to get you for credit card fraud" from down the block in a full sprint before he got there and then Blake's refusal to acknowledge him constituted resisting?
Posted by Lsu4thewin
rightoverthere
Member since May 2014
313 posts
Posted on 9/11/15 at 4:42 pm to
You have to be joking or a complete idiot
Posted by The Egg
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2004
83937 posts
Posted on 9/11/15 at 4:43 pm to
quote:

0:00-0:05= the officer attempting to place the suspect in a passive non-threatening posture.

0:06-0:08= The suspect shoves the cop and appears to be fighting him off with what I can only assume to be the intent of potentially disarming the police officer.

0:08-0:09= Controlled takedown of the suspect.
GODDAMN this dude is good.
Posted by OleWarSkuleAlum
Huntsville, AL
Member since Dec 2013
10293 posts
Posted on 9/11/15 at 4:43 pm to
quote:

ou think he yelled "hey I'm a police officer


No however from 0:00-0:06 which is a good amount of time when he is placing the suspect in a passive posture for his protection I'm sure he said at a minimum something to the effect of, "Police don't move."
Posted by Breesus
Unplug
Member since Jan 2010
69549 posts
Posted on 9/11/15 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

he officer attempting to place the suspect in a passive non-threatening posture.


You talking the part where he runs up to him, unidentified and in plain clothes, grabs him, turns him around, and smashes him up against that door frame?

quote:

he suspect shoves the cop and appears to be fighting him off with what I can only assume to be the intent of potentially disarming the police officer


I saw it as him trying to assist the cop by placing himself in a more passive position making it easier for the cop to arrest him. How do you not see that?
Posted by Gulf Coast Tiger
Ms Gulf Coast
Member since Jan 2004
21819 posts
Posted on 9/11/15 at 4:44 pm to
quote:

video by southerneliteOr, he could have just walked up to him, and said, "hey, I'd like to ask you a few questions."


You could do that with most criminals and then you are either chasing them or fighting them. Criminals, whether they have committed a violent crime or a property crime, don't think like you do. It is fight or flight for them.
Posted by Breesus
Unplug
Member since Jan 2010
69549 posts
Posted on 9/11/15 at 4:45 pm to
quote:

m sure he said at a minimum something to the effect of, "Police don't move."


There's is not a shot in hell a rational full grown male will simply submit to another male attacking him because of these words.

Identifying yourself ad a cop is not saying words. It's presenting a badge.

Next
Posted by baybeefeetz
Member since Sep 2009
32989 posts
Posted on 9/11/15 at 4:45 pm to
Dudes, has anybody pointed out how no fricks were given by anybody who passed by while this was happening?

Jesus. I would have at least gawked if not pulled out my phone.

Posted by The Egg
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2004
83937 posts
Posted on 9/11/15 at 4:46 pm to
i still don't know how the vid exonerates the cop.

they got the wrong fricking dude.
Posted by Breesus
Unplug
Member since Jan 2010
69549 posts
Posted on 9/11/15 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

You could do that with most criminals and then you are either chasing them or fighting them.


That's your job as a cop. You're seriously comfortable with giving officers the legal right to arrest and take down first and then investigate and ask questions later?
Posted by OleWarSkuleAlum
Huntsville, AL
Member since Dec 2013
10293 posts
Posted on 9/11/15 at 4:49 pm to
quote:

i still don't know how the vid exonerates the cop.

they got the wrong fricking dude.


The claim is "excessive force." The video clearly disproves that.

As I said before this is a PR campaign due to the white guilt this country is struggling with. It was a black suspect who resisted being detained by a hard working white police officer. The NYPD didn't want riots and looting so they made an example of a good police officer.
Posted by The Egg
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2004
83937 posts
Posted on 9/11/15 at 4:50 pm to
quote:

As I said before this is a PR campaign due to the white guilt this country is struggling with. It was a black suspect who resisted being detained by a hard working white police officer. The NYPD didn't want riots and looting so they made an example of a good police officer.
fricking solid troll.

and if serious, you are a racist piece of shite, but you already knew that.
Posted by Barf
EBR
Member since Feb 2015
3727 posts
Posted on 9/11/15 at 5:01 pm to
So what happens if a cop pulls that with someone who knows how to fight and that cop gets fricked up? Does that person get charged?
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
112628 posts
Posted on 9/11/15 at 5:29 pm to
He had every fricking legal right to resist. He was an innocent person being physically attacked by a non uniformed person who didn't show a badge
Posted by Yewkindewit
Near Birmingham, Alabama
Member since Apr 2012
22034 posts
Posted on 9/11/15 at 5:34 pm to
He was suspect. Officer handled it in aggressive fashion to avoid any chance of resistance. No problem with this IMO.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
112628 posts
Posted on 9/11/15 at 5:39 pm to
frick you you communist bastard. You just can't go around physically tackling people because they are "suspects". I mean Jesus Christ people this is America, we have rights and shite
Posted by southernelite
Houston, TX
Member since Sep 2009
53568 posts
Posted on 9/11/15 at 5:40 pm to
quote:

. Criminals,


Guy wasn't a criminal.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
112628 posts
Posted on 9/11/15 at 5:42 pm to
It is amazing how some people willingly want to give police officers the right to tackle whoever they please because they "think" they are guilty. I mean we honestly have people that wanted to give one of the lowest IQ professions a free pass to just beat the shite out of people It shows how easily people willingly give away their rights and freedoms
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
38394 posts
Posted on 9/11/15 at 5:43 pm to
quote:

He was suspect. Officer handled it in aggressive fashion to avoid any chance of resistance. No problem with this IMO.




the NYPD seems to disagree with you, but what do they know? Stupid frick
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
112628 posts
Posted on 9/11/15 at 5:43 pm to
Actually, this is awesome. Dknt like someone? Just go tell a cop he stole something and they will give him a good roughing up and it won't be a big deal. Need someone dead? Tell the cop he has a gun on them and they will shoot him for you and no big deal
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram