- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: NHS England says First-cousin marriage has ‘benefits’
Posted on 9/29/25 at 12:17 pm to DownSouthJukin
Posted on 9/29/25 at 12:17 pm to DownSouthJukin
quote:
Who knew England and Alabama had so much in common?
Birmingham residents did.
Posted on 9/29/25 at 12:18 pm to The Egg
Not surprised, just look at the Royal family and a lot of brits.
Looking retarded and inbreeding goes together
Looking retarded and inbreeding goes together
Posted on 9/29/25 at 12:20 pm to The Egg
quote:
stronger extended family support systems
I mean that’s one way to put it
Posted on 9/29/25 at 12:29 pm to The Egg
I’m not advocating for cousin marriage but I thought the increased risk for offspring of cousins wasn’t really much higher than normal marriages. It’s brother/sister ones that are really high
Posted on 9/29/25 at 12:31 pm to waiting4saturday
Re conversion to Islam:
How would you expect C3 or Harry to memorize the Koran? Much less in Arabic?
How would you expect C3 or Harry to memorize the Koran? Much less in Arabic?
Posted on 9/29/25 at 12:39 pm to genro
quote:
the King’s parents were first cousins, what do you expect
This is false. They were related, but not that close.
Queen Victoria and Prince Albert were first cousins.
Posted on 9/29/25 at 12:48 pm to The Egg
Did the King write the article?
Posted on 9/29/25 at 12:50 pm to The Egg
I’ve seen in in immigrants in the US in a hospital (these immigrants would look at home in Birmingham UK if you get my drift).
Posted on 9/29/25 at 12:51 pm to cdur86
quote:
I will never understand this board's fascination with immediately naming Alabama everytime cousin marriage is brought up.
When Oklahoma played Alabama in the 2014 Sugar Bowl, my wife and I ended up on the morning of the game at Happy's Irish Pub on Poydras just down the street from the stadium.
We had been there the night before for a private party, so it was familiar.
Bama fans greatly outnumbered Sooner fans that morning. I got into a conversation with a father and his son.
I was a little drunk, and I asked them "Is it true that you guys marry your cousins?". It just slipped out.
About that time, I got the feeling I was about to get my arse beat. But they both laughed about it and ended up buying my wife and I shots.
I know, cool story, bro.
Posted on 9/29/25 at 12:52 pm to TulsaSooner78
quote:
Queen Victoria and Prince Albert were first cousins.
They were married 185 years ago
The article is specifically referring to muslim immigrants
Posted on 9/29/25 at 1:02 pm to SloaneRanger
quote:
Don’t think that’s right. They were both descendants of Queen Victoria, but I don’t think they were first cousins. But there is no question that the inbreeding has fricked up that particular line.
They were 3rd cousins on one side of the family (both were Queen Victoria's great-great grandchildren) and 2nd cousins, once removed on another side (Danish royals).
I would be remiss if I didn't remind folks that, before the U.S. Civil War, cousin marriage was relatively unregulated in the United States. Most folks never/rarely traveled more than 30 miles from where they were born. Communities were much smaller. If you wanted to get married and have children back then, you had to at least consider distant cousins as potential mates and many did (I mean, do the math). First cousin is a high risk proposition, however, and a high risk roll in the genetic lottery.
In extremis, if few/other options were available, more distant than 2nd cousin would be a reasonable guideline to maintain some sort of genetic diversity within a family tree.
Posted on 9/29/25 at 1:08 pm to The Egg
Pakistanis in the UK have a high inbreeding rate. So the media is doing insane things to make the Muslim invaders seem normal or good.
Posted on 9/29/25 at 1:15 pm to The Egg
Yeah, wasn’t it great when Queen Victoria married all her daughters to related European Royalty and introduced hemophilia to all the royal bloodlines?
Posted on 9/29/25 at 1:37 pm to VermilionTiger
quote:You think it’s just Muslim culture to marry cousins? It was completely part of British culture as well
They really are changing their culture to further “normalize” Muslim culture
This post was edited on 9/29/25 at 1:39 pm
Posted on 9/29/25 at 1:41 pm to lsupride87
Brits had seemingly moved past this. Immigrants haven’t.
I’m seeing it in US hospital.
I’m seeing it in US hospital.
Posted on 9/29/25 at 1:43 pm to The Egg
England is more SEC than Missouri.
Posted on 9/29/25 at 1:44 pm to billjamin
quote:
billjamin
quote:
Roll Tide
Stay in your lane.
Roll Tide.
Posted on 9/29/25 at 1:56 pm to RoIITide
And they thought Tylenol was causing it...
Posted on 9/29/25 at 3:00 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
They were married 185 years ago
The article is specifically referring to muslim immigrants
I was responding to the person who claimed that Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip were first cousins. They weren't.
By the way, first cousin marriage is fully legal in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, South Carolina, and several other states.
It is a felony in Oklahoma.
Back to top


0








