Started By
Message

re: New Jersey teacher who slept with students at family bagel shop learns prison sentence

Posted on 2/13/26 at 8:37 pm to
Posted by Dr Rosenrosen
Member since May 2006
4267 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 8:37 pm to
She must have had a bad lawyer. Ten years is outrageous in this case. She should have gotten 2 years and probation at worst.
Posted by Friendly Satan
Member since Nov 2024
1648 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 8:53 pm to
You’re Joking, right?

Posted by Grievous Angel
Tuscaloosa, AL
Member since Dec 2008
10895 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 9:08 pm to
quote:

If guys 16 plus... I'm gonna be honest, at 14 I'd have made every bagel in the store with my penis to get a chance to dip it between her knees. Much less anywhere fun. And she looks like Voldemort.


Agreed. These stories are not the same.

I lost it at 15 to an 18 year old...not sure if that even counts as "statutory" or whatever, but it was the greatest (short) time of my life.

If I had some even moderately attractive grown assed woman getting freaky with me? All the better.

I'm not saying it's right. I'm just saying these boys are probably not damaged.
Posted by NorthGwinnettTiger
Member since Jun 2006
53279 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 9:13 pm to
quote:

This B was psy-cho


They all are.
Posted by X123F45
Member since Apr 2015
29831 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 10:03 pm to
quote:

we're not marrying our 14 year old daughters to 12 year old sons for land and titles. Buncha neanderthals on this forum


Speak for yourself, enjoy being a sharecropper you land poor peasant.
Posted by WhoDatNC
NC
Member since Dec 2013
14338 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 10:25 pm to
I can hear her annoying voice without hearing her annoying voice.
Posted by Lou Loomis
A pond. Ponds good for you.
Member since Mar 2025
1968 posts
Posted on 2/13/26 at 10:32 pm to
quote:

One victim was 17 and the other 18


Ten years is excessive. 17, 18 years old boys are out to get laid and they’re old enough to ghost these chicks or tell them to get lost if they want to get rid of them.

And don’t give me this grooming crap. Just a bunch of made up buzzwords that prosecutors use to promote victimhood and the idiots in the media love to endlessly parrot.
Posted by dallastigers
Member since Dec 2003
10613 posts
Posted on 2/14/26 at 12:17 am to
quote:

And? The age of consent law is 16 in New Jersey.


It’s not not that clear cut as NJ has some exceptions. The 17 wasn’t able to legally consent due to the teacher being in position of authority. Depending on her role at the business getting him the job working for her family’s business could have also been seen as having additional authority over the 17 year old. She also possibly could have started grooming him when he was a freshman.

The sex with the 18 year old was more about ethics, teacher’s contract, or if they have anything specifically about teachers in law elsewhere like having to wait a certain time after graduation; but 17 would have been criminal for any position of authority not just teachers. Also, with the 18 year old the grooming could have began when he was a junior.

quote:

The age of consent in New Jersey is 16.

There is an exception. If the victim is less than 18 and the partner is a parent, guardian, sibling or any other person closer than a fourth cousin or has any type of authority over the victim (for example, a teacher) then the assailant may be charged with a crime. For instance, it's criminal for a manager of any age to have sex with a 16 or 17-year-old subordinate, even if the sex is consensual.


She was definitely a predator regardless of whether or not at that age we would have seen her that way if it has been us. She had a pattern including getting them jobs and having sex at the jobs, and I doubt she went from 2018 to 2024 without having hooked with another student in the same manner between the times of these 2 students. She attempted to get both to destroy evidence during the investigation. Did she get them to do anything wrong while having sex with them?

A lot more kids today are very immature at 17 than when I was that age. They might view it as more than just sex and could have an emotional attachment to the teacher along with the sex that can affect them in future relationships and in dealings with female professors and bosses in the future.

10 years still seems too harsh especially when only one would have been considered criminal for any position of authority over the kid.
quote:

… the criminal conduct by Rizzitello involved two victims, one of whom she met when he was a freshman and the other she met when he was a junior.

After initially asking to spend time with them alone and developing a casually friendly relationship, the conduct escalated to sexual activity with each, lasting for a period of several months. The sexual acts with both victims took place largely in three locations: in Rizzitello’s Brick home, in a vehicle at a Wall Township parking lot, and at the Belmar bagel shop owned by Rizzitello’s family, where each victim was employed, at her suggestion.
This post was edited on 2/14/26 at 12:28 am
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
36755 posts
Posted on 2/14/26 at 12:51 am to
Guilty.


Of a lesser and included offense. Maybe no seatbelt. 1st offense. Waive the fine.
Posted by LSUinMA
Commerce, Texas
Member since Nov 2008
4963 posts
Posted on 2/14/26 at 8:00 am to
quote:

It's an ethics violation you retards. It's literally a core Tennant of teaching.


A core “Tennant.”

Not tenet, which is the word you are grasping for. Not even tenantt, which would be also incorrect.

But we’re the retards.
Posted by RohanGonzales
Pronoun: Whatever
Member since Apr 2024
10707 posts
Posted on 2/14/26 at 8:03 am to
quote:

The Sacred Heart NOLA teacher was hotter


C'mon man, she is from New Jersey, you have to grade her on a curve.
Posted by chinhoyang
Member since Jun 2011
26069 posts
Posted on 2/15/26 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

it absolutely is. A 37 year old should be able to pull a mid 20s aged kid just as easily if they are not ugly. Keep it legal, save yourself 10.


I fully realize the legal reality. But, many 17 year old boys are perfectly happy having sex with an older woman and they don't need to be groomed. The article loves the buzzwords - "sexual assault" (legally yes, not necessarily in the generally accepted non-legal context however) and "grooming." Two guys in my high school (when seniors, one grade above me) fricked a teacher and the divorced mother of a 10th grade boy. Both guys are successful, no trauma, no angst.

Represented a high school senior who was having sex with his high school senior girlfriend - who told him she was 17. Turns out she was 16 and he was 19 - in the same exact grade in school. I didn't handle the criminal case (I was working on getting it off the kids record). "Molestation of a juvenile" was the charge. Sounds like some really heinous act, but in many cases it is not. His penalty: $500 fine. D.A. should have exercised some discretion and tossed it out.

So I don't get called out, I'm fully aware that the fact that the "victim" lies about age is not a defense.
Posted by Blueghost1978
Metairie, LA
Member since Jan 2024
912 posts
Posted on 2/15/26 at 1:03 pm to
She’ll be out in 4 with “good behavior “ says the Warden ;)
Posted by Roaad
White Privilege Broker
Member since Aug 2006
84013 posts
Posted on 2/15/26 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

family bagel shop
Am I the only one surprised she in a non-jew?
Posted by SmelvinRat
Slumwoody
Member since Oct 2015
2077 posts
Posted on 2/15/26 at 1:26 pm to
quote:

be placed on parole supervision for life


Has to check in with a parole officer for life. Damn.
Posted by LSUtoBOOT
Member since Aug 2012
20422 posts
Posted on 2/15/26 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

C'mon man, she is from New Jersey, you have to grade her on a curve.

Based on the curve of her arse I’d grade it bigger than average but not requiring two trips for her to haul arse.

Posted by Lou Loomis
A pond. Ponds good for you.
Member since Mar 2025
1968 posts
Posted on 2/15/26 at 1:44 pm to
The Au Pair who killed two people only got 10 years! And this chuck gets 10 for having sec with a 17 and an 18 year old?! That’s way out of proportion!

This au pair comes from Columbia to work for a family. Starts an affair with husband. Husband and au pair want to get rid of wife so he sets up a “home invasion” of his house. The sicko husband posed as his wife online and told some dude that she (the wife) has always had a rape fantasy. Husband convinced the guy to “break into” the house and rape his wife. This guy thinks jackpot and breaks in to the house.

Husband and au pair are lying in wait and kill both wife and “intruder”. The girl only got 10 years for helping kill two innocent people.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
77270 posts
Posted on 2/15/26 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

The Au Pair who killed two people only got 10 years! And this chuck gets 10 for having sec with a 17 and an 18 year old?! That’s way out of proportion!
She broke the law.

These are the penalties.

Everyone arguing your point in this thread would demand that a male who did this with a 17 and 18 year female be buried under the prison.

Sorry, this is 2026. Women should know not to do this.

Easily avoidable situation for her.
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
84750 posts
Posted on 2/15/26 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

Would you agree if it was a 37-yo baw with your underage daughters / neices?


No. But it’s not.
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
77270 posts
Posted on 2/15/26 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

No. But it’s not.
Irrelevant.

I would want this for a male or female.

There should be zero distinction under the law.

That is equality. Every American should be equal under the law.

This woman should know better.
This post was edited on 2/15/26 at 2:13 pm
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram