Started By
Message

re: Minimum wage in the 1970s would be the equivalent of making almost $56,000 a year now

Posted on 4/22/26 at 9:53 am to
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
41093 posts
Posted on 4/22/26 at 9:53 am to
quote:

Trucks, on the other hand, have not.



They have when you consider that a 2026 Ford Ranger is pretty comparable in size and capability to a 2000 F150. Those can be had for low 30s, which is less than what a 2000 F150 would cost you, adjusted for inflation.

Hell I saw a first gen Tundra the other day and that thing was fricking tiny by today's standards.
Posted by NawlinsTiger9
Where the mongooses roam
Member since Jan 2009
39659 posts
Posted on 4/22/26 at 9:54 am to
quote:

No one is making you live in that area


There it is! The final boss of this dumbass argument
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
38054 posts
Posted on 4/22/26 at 9:54 am to
i agree somewhat with your point. its not easy in many places to buy 150k home and boomers are certainly stupid AF with this shite


but to be fair....take a place like where I live Lake Charles, LA

pretty damn good economy for someone that wants to work in refining or engineering. you can buy brand new home in the metro area for under 175k. 3br, 2ba 1400sf for 175k.

there are places all in SEtx, all over LA etc that are similar.
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
108040 posts
Posted on 4/22/26 at 9:55 am to
quote:

There are no homes in safe areas with functioning job markets that you can find for $150k. This is a dream that doesn’t exist anymore. It is about time that you recognize this as a fact.


Nah man. You need to move two counties away from a functioning job market area to find your 150k starter home.

Don’t worry about the $4.50 a gallon gas though you’ll need to put in your 2011 Nissan with 180k miles because used cars are about $15k+ these days.
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
41093 posts
Posted on 4/22/26 at 9:55 am to
quote:

You dudes act like people that made it on their own


My tax dollars are the foundation for your success. Pipe down.
Posted by Techdave
Laffy
Member since Apr 2014
828 posts
Posted on 4/22/26 at 9:56 am to
quote:

Brother, it’s been established the median home price is 420k. Starter homes are going for 300k .but your advice is to go buy some shitbox in the ghetto for 150k? In a failing public school district they can’t use?

The ENTIRE point of this conversation is that if someone who is 21 years old does exactly what you did when you were 21 years old, they end up in a much worse spot. And as far as I can tell, your position on the topic is “suck for you, just work harder” instead of “wow, maybe things got messed up along the way, we should probably try to fix it.”

Can you not see how disingenuous that is?


I think half of you guys aren't willing to do what it takes. And want someone else to fix your problem.
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
41093 posts
Posted on 4/22/26 at 9:56 am to
quote:

Bad news is that the cheapest one is still almost $35,000


No it's not. You can get them new for low 30s. You can get one a year or two used for mid 20s.
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
59187 posts
Posted on 4/22/26 at 9:56 am to
As someone on this board for a while I remember in the engineering threads 15 years ago the boomers would complain that the new grads were starting at 75k when they had to work for 50k as a new grad back in 1982

What does a new engineering grad start at now? 85k? Also consider that getting a degree at lsu was basically free 15 years ago and now it’s like 100k
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
77268 posts
Posted on 4/22/26 at 9:56 am to
quote:

My point is that buying a 300k home as your first home is pretty unrealistic.
That is what “starter homes” are going for.

I lived in Jackson, MS for almost a decade.

Out 2000 sqft, 2 bedroom 2 bath home outside of the crime ridden hellhole that is Jackson sold for $300k in 2023.

I would have had to live within Jackson-proper, in the shittiest of areas, to find a home $150k or less.
Posted by caro81
Member since Jul 2017
6354 posts
Posted on 4/22/26 at 9:57 am to
No offense dave, by you seem real out of touch. Also your whole argument still doesnt address the fact that things are undoubtedly getting worse over the decades when it comes to the average americans economic position.
Posted by Techdave
Laffy
Member since Apr 2014
828 posts
Posted on 4/22/26 at 9:57 am to
quote:

My first home was $300k. Why is it unrealistic? Maybe you should have got a better degree?

Pretty dumb argument, huh?


You are an exception and should be proud of that. However, most people should set their sights lower.
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
92264 posts
Posted on 4/22/26 at 9:57 am to
quote:

There are no homes in safe areas with functioning job markets that you can find for $150k.



siding with Scruffy on this, I just looked up prices in what was a very nice neighborhood near where I grew up, home prices are reasonable, and the lots are decent sized but I also looked up the crime stats in that area and I believe that is what is keeping the prices down


ETA: the high school, which was once as good of a public high school as there was in town is now a ghetto infested war zone
This post was edited on 4/22/26 at 10:00 am
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
111488 posts
Posted on 4/22/26 at 9:58 am to
quote:

Techdave
This guy believes Haitians have it just as easy as American born children
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
38054 posts
Posted on 4/22/26 at 9:58 am to
quote:

There are no homes in safe areas with functioning job markets that you can find for $150k.

This is a dream that doesn’t exist anymore.

It is about time that you recognize this as a fact.


yes there are and in good school districts

i fully acknowledge though that for 75% of the country this is not a reality but there are places along i-10 that still have them but your overall point is correct
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
150370 posts
Posted on 4/22/26 at 9:58 am to
quote:

Get a better degree or trade, save your money, don't spend on stupid shite, build equity in a smaller house then upgrade to a larger one.


There, I solved this problem.
you forgot about lattes, YouTube tv, and avocado toast
Posted by RolltidePA
North Carolina
Member since Dec 2010
5633 posts
Posted on 4/22/26 at 9:59 am to
quote:

No it's not. You can get them new for low 30s. You can get one a year or two used for mid 20s.



According to Ford "The 2026 Ford Ranger starts at $33,350 for the base XL model"

It may be just me, but $33,350 is almost $35,000. I get it, that's MSRP and all. But they aren't cheap and more expensive than things were in the '80's.
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
108040 posts
Posted on 4/22/26 at 9:59 am to
quote:

siding with Scruffy on this, I just looked up prices in what was a very nice neighborhood near where I grew up, home prices are reasonable, and the lots are decent sized but I also looked up the crime stats in that area and I believe that is what is keeping the prices down


I live in a pretty middle class suburb of Louisville. I just watched a developer in our neighborhood group justify building townhomes about 5 minutes from my house starting at 400k.

Townhomes.
Posted by lsu777
Lake Charles
Member since Jan 2004
38054 posts
Posted on 4/22/26 at 10:00 am to
quote:

Sure.

Houses that are traditionally under 1,000 square feet aren’t being built anymore (for a lot of reasons). The ones that are, either still have older generations living in them or are being bought up by venture capitalists and LLCs to rent out.


i didnt say under 1000 lol. you so mad at others you didnt read. I know they suck but dont lump me in with them

i said a 1000 less

median home size today is like 2386 and it was under 1400 in '71.

in general though you are correct. for much of the country 14-1500 SF homes for under 200k do not exist much less 150k.

there are pockets it does but everyone cant move to those pockets or it wont be that price anymore either


my point was that today we do not live like its 1971 anymore. you find an old houses in small suburbs in places for that price but you will almost have to live like its 71 if you dont want to put more into. its possible, not probable for the msot part
This post was edited on 4/22/26 at 10:02 am
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
77268 posts
Posted on 4/22/26 at 10:00 am to
quote:

I think half of you guys aren't willing to do what it takes. And want someone else to fix your problem.
The majority of us aren’t even the demographic affected by this.

My wife and I are both physicians. We don’t have issues with this.

But I am not disingenuous and retarded enough to not recognize how screwed up the economic situation of younger generations are.

Just because you “got yours” doesn’t mean you can’t recognize the horrendous burden the economy has placed on others.
Posted by Techdave
Laffy
Member since Apr 2014
828 posts
Posted on 4/22/26 at 10:00 am to
quote:

That is what “starter homes” are going for.

I lived in Jackson, MS for almost a decade.

Out 2000 sqft, 2 bedroom 2 bath home outside of the crime ridden hellhole that is Jackson sold for $300k in 2023.

I would have had to live within Jackson-proper, in the shittiest of areas, to find a home $150k or less.



Let's be honest, Jackson isn't known for the best of living situations. I live in Lafayette. Just a quick Redfin search shows lots of options for a starter home in decent areas under $200k.
Jump to page
Page First 5 6 7 8 9 ... 22
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 22Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram