Started By
Message

re: Milton, most sensationalized Hurricane ever?

Posted on 10/10/24 at 1:42 pm to
Posted by white beans
Member since Sep 2009
6860 posts
Posted on 10/10/24 at 1:42 pm to
I'm speaking strictly on the fake news media's behavior in the face of real data, and in no way trying to downplay the storm or the negative effect it has had on good people.

Not running my mouth, just highlighting some major reconciliation issues. Maybe should have been a poli board post.
Posted by LemmyLives
Texas
Member since Mar 2019
15882 posts
Posted on 10/10/24 at 1:44 pm to
quote:

weathermen on twitter, because every weather event worth mentioning, he made sound apocalyptic.


I don’t need a shot of a weatherman in a rain coat, ever again. We already have cameras on every block, in every store, etc.
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
70004 posts
Posted on 10/10/24 at 1:45 pm to
go to google maps and just zoom in on the homes and buildings from TB down the west coast of florida. It is unbelievable how many homes are within a mile of the beach. The hurricane was 180 mph less than 48 hrs before landfall. It pretty much did exactly what they forecasted it to do....but what if it did somehow stay a cat 5 and hit around TB...best to err on the side of caution IMO
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
107902 posts
Posted on 10/10/24 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

I'm speaking strictly on the fake news media's behavior in the face of real data, and in no way trying to downplay the storm or the negative effect it has had on good people.

Not running my mouth, just highlighting some major reconciliation issues. Maybe should have been a poli board post.


So how would you have liked them (and "fake news media" seems pretty broad, so I'm not sure who exactly you're discussing) to report it differently? From what I saw, which was mostly meterologist/NWS type news, they reported it fired up pretty quick to a Cat 5 then weakened before landfall. But because of existing issues from Helene storm surge, even a decreased hurrican would cause issues.

I'm just not sure who you're asking to not "sensationalize". Local and state governments started rolling out mandatory evacuation orders over good data that predicted the possibility it could hit Tampa head on (which would be horrific) or that it wouldn't weaken as they had hoped (we've all seen that happen recently).
Posted by Tigerroar73
Member since Oct 2014
366 posts
Posted on 10/10/24 at 1:48 pm to
You have a short memory. The NWS basically acts like the worst case scenario is going to happen before every hurricane.

This results in about 85% of hurricanes being over-sensationalized.

But it's still hard to blame the NWS. It's better that people overprepare than that they underprepare.
Posted by LemmyLives
Texas
Member since Mar 2019
15882 posts
Posted on 10/10/24 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

speaking strictly on the fake news media's behavior in the face of real data


I think your failure was in not being extremely specific (my Cat 6 example for instance.) Topics that are likely to cause anecdotes about granny drowning, etc., have to be very carefully phrased, otherwise the topic narrative that gets established in the first three replies becomes a wildfire that takes over your thread.
Posted by Nutriaitch
Montegut
Member since Apr 2008
10885 posts
Posted on 10/10/24 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

but what if it did somehow stay a cat 5 and hit around TB.


this.
the NHC is good, but not perfect, and they do "miss" on intensity sometimes.

there have been some storms that continued strengthening right up until landfall despite all the info saying they would weaken.
you really don't want to be telling people that this thing was going to bomb out and be a 2 then have Ida roar in.

also, they readily admit their projected landfall have a margin of error of 20-30nm
that goes from Siesta Key (where it hit) to St. Pete and sending surge into the Bay.

Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
131399 posts
Posted on 10/10/24 at 1:53 pm to
quote:

most sensationalized Hurricane ever?


Superstorm Sandy
/thread
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
70004 posts
Posted on 10/10/24 at 1:56 pm to

i am pretty amazed with how accurate predicting intensity and landfall has become.
Posted by I20goon
about 7mi down a dirt road
Member since Aug 2013
19829 posts
Posted on 10/10/24 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

But how many movies, documentaries etc on tsunamis does the world need to make to tell people that rising water is a killer?
there is no correlation between tsunamis and sea level rise.

Besides, last time I saw so called data they said sea levels were rising in Asia only.
Posted by white beans
Member since Sep 2009
6860 posts
Posted on 10/10/24 at 2:09 pm to
the ad homs have been a trip
Posted by LemmyLives
Texas
Member since Mar 2019
15882 posts
Posted on 10/10/24 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

tsunamis and sea level rise.

WTF?

Rising water means storm surge. Tsunamis are an extreme, but easily available visual for people that don’t get what rushing water can do.

Did you somehow make this about climate change, because I didn’t.
Posted by Jay Are
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2014
6111 posts
Posted on 10/10/24 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

Milton, most sensationalized Hurricane ever?


It's always good to start your thread about hyperbolic media coverage with an out-of-control-hyperbolic question.
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
40996 posts
Posted on 10/10/24 at 2:30 pm to
quote:

white beans



quote:

Does Katrina count to you?



Where are you located?
Posted by I20goon
about 7mi down a dirt road
Member since Aug 2013
19829 posts
Posted on 10/10/24 at 2:33 pm to
quote:

WTF?

Rising water means storm surge. Tsunamis are an extreme, but easily available visual for people that don’t get what rushing water can do.

Did you somehow make this about climate change, because I didn’t.
my mistake. I thought when you said water levels you were indeed referring to the climate change boogabear of rising sea levels.

Yes, a tsunami is indeed a drastic and extreme in water levels.
Posted by semjase
New Smyrna Beach FL
Member since May 2014
15770 posts
Posted on 10/10/24 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

do you not realize that if that thing had held together how devastating it would have been the people in the path of that storm got very very very lucky
OP (White Beans) is another one of those TD.com nut job attention whores that will post anything to get people to notice that he's alive and sucking in Nitrogen & Oxygen.

"The Hurricane really wasn't that bad and I'm upset that it weakened before landfall. Let me run to TD.com and complain so everybody will pay attention to Me."
Posted by BradBallard
Wilmington, Delaware
Member since Jun 2020
567 posts
Posted on 10/10/24 at 3:33 pm to
Let me get this straight - Milton was a Cat 5 with 160 mph winds at the 5am 10/9 update, 15 hours before landfall. It was also on a track with high probability to hit Tampa.

How was it overhyped? Yes, it was predicted and did weaken. But, the cost of being wrong would have been thousands of lives.
Posted by JDPndahizzy
JDP
Member since Nov 2013
6960 posts
Posted on 10/10/24 at 3:46 pm to
quote:


This is what I am talking about, the fake news media toying with people is a massive issue.

It’s what causes people to ignore reporting, and ride out truly catastrophic storms when they need to GTFO.


At 5pm yesterday they were calling it the "Storm of the Century" on all the national news.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
89557 posts
Posted on 10/10/24 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

Given the fact that we cant control or predict with certainty (sorry poli board) where hurricanes are going, it's better than the alternative of "yeah this thing is going to weaken 4 hours before landfall, youre good to go about normal business" and then 1000 people die.



or you end up with a katrina. where people dont believe the boy who cried wolf and stay.


Not taking it seriously and fear mongering are both bad. Two wrongs don't make a right.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
42539 posts
Posted on 10/10/24 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

You’re an idiot. It was a strong cat 3 at landfall. You’ve never been thorough a cat 3 storm that’s almost certain. Very few have


The NHC said it was a major hurricane at landfall, but I haven’t seen any real measurements that document that.

I say that not to minimize the damage that did occur, but to point out that if a strong 3 were to make landfall in the same aress as things would have been much worse.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram