Started By
Message

re: Microsoft AI chief says in 5 years AI can do every white collar job.

Posted on 2/17/26 at 4:58 pm to
Posted by jdd48
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2012
23780 posts
Posted on 2/17/26 at 4:58 pm to
quote:

Sounds like you are describing a free tool or older AI or short codes. AI can generate apps or codes or whatever that used to take a team a year to write. And it’s going to get better. It might have some debugging but it will definitely take out a large amount of people by doing 95% of the work.


Boiler plate style stuff yes. Deeper involved tasks or complex processes, not so much. I kind of chuckle every time this comes up because I am in the IT business. I personally feel the hysteria around AI, the pie in the sky promises, etc are all a bit too much. I am not saying it has no purpose of course, but it has to be used in the right context.


This post was edited on 2/17/26 at 5:02 pm
Posted by thelawnwranglers
Member since Sep 2007
42332 posts
Posted on 2/17/26 at 5:02 pm to
Ai can't even fix my spelling
Posted by Mr.Perfect
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2013
17605 posts
Posted on 2/17/26 at 5:41 pm to
quote:

Good luck.
quote:

Mudge87


When 98.5% of cases are settled before trial this is absolutely zeeeero advantage to giving an attorney 40% to file some motions with white out
Posted by wesfau
Member since Mar 2023
2358 posts
Posted on 2/17/26 at 6:06 pm to
quote:

giving an attorney 40% to file some motions with white out


If that was your experience with a lawyer, then I understand your consternation. That said, I would never venture into litigation unrepresented. And I'm a lawyer.
Posted by Mr.Perfect
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2013
17605 posts
Posted on 2/17/26 at 6:36 pm to
quote:

I would never venture into litigation unrepresented. And I'm a lawyer.


I should be more specific. There are many many areas of law where I completely agree. Personal injury is the area that can be replaced in nearly 100% of current litigation
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
91524 posts
Posted on 2/17/26 at 6:38 pm to
If it can do all of them in 5 years, how many is it doing now?

And should that factor in to how we interpret jobs reports?
Posted by Sun God
Member since Jul 2009
51935 posts
Posted on 2/17/26 at 6:39 pm to
Thank god I went from geoengineering to moving furniture
Posted by gaetti15
AK
Member since Apr 2013
15297 posts
Posted on 2/17/26 at 6:42 pm to
quote:

I kind of chuckle every time this comes up because I am in the IT business. I personally feel the hysteria around AI, the pie in the sky promises, etc are all a bit too much. I am not saying it has no purpose of course, but it has to be used in the right context.


100%

But the others that disagree with you because they need to sell a product would say "well look how far its come so far, surely the growth will continue exponentially!"

I mean i love my AI robot overlords more than anything, I live to serve! But, AI is only as good as the information it gets fed. And people are getting dumber (and the user base is also getting dumber)
This post was edited on 2/17/26 at 6:43 pm
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
122172 posts
Posted on 2/17/26 at 6:51 pm to
AI will likely replace 6 or 7% pf the work force while at the same time be a factor in creating other job opportunities. AI is a tool, like a saw.. And you have to know how to use it. According to ChatGPT only around 10% of its users use it to its capabilities so while AI has arrived, its going to take a few years before it becomes a norm in the work place.

AGI will be the next. AGI learns how to reason.. but does it faster than humans. This will allow systems to be able to improve themselves, etc.

AGI will result in medical breakthroughs at a much faster pace.

Also, now AI is a new buzzword. You see products advertising.. "AI capabilities". A lot of that shite.. I guess technically it can be AI. But if that's the case your iphone has had "AI capabilities" for awhile. It uses information it knows about you to advertise products that are bettered directed towards you.

I do think people should become more familiar with "AI". If anything, get on ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, etc and tell it "I would like to learn more about you and your capabilities. Can you create a lesson plan where every time I come here and want to learn something else, I can just pick up at where I left off?"

It will teach you about its capabilities, etc.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
115433 posts
Posted on 2/17/26 at 6:54 pm to
quote:

Everybody else is in trouble. Even lawyers.


Certain areas, absolutely (transactional, M&A, wills and successions). Any area that actively avoids a courtroom or litigation.

No AI will ever be an in court litigator or appellate advocate, will never take a deposition, etc.
This post was edited on 2/17/26 at 7:18 pm
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
122172 posts
Posted on 2/17/26 at 7:02 pm to
quote:

Nobody likes sales reps


If they offer to buy lunch they can be tolerated, however; if they buy you lunch and it doesn't lead to anything, they will complain to the company about how they are taking people to lunch and it isn't resulting in anything, which you would think is a risk they take. Its not anyone's fault they are calling people and telling them "Hey.. So you are on ____ project right? Where are the _____ being bought from? I might be able to help the budget on the project a little, what are you doing for lunch"..

I get the impression a lot of sales reps think they are better at their job than they actually are
Posted by geauxjuice
t(-.-t)
Member since Jan 2007
4420 posts
Posted on 2/17/26 at 7:15 pm to
quote:

It's too much to handle. Too much stress. Standing up for 8 hours, high temperatures, thinking about 6 tasks and doing them at the same time, with more rolling in.


i worked in plenty restaurant/ sorority house kitchens when i was younger and while i agree that it's stressful you chef types are frickin insufferable with this shite. whoever made that show the bear oughta be shot.
Posted by NukemVol
Member since Jan 2010
1734 posts
Posted on 2/17/26 at 7:43 pm to
Google and Amazon have put $10b into Anthropic. They are funding nuclear plants. All the noise is saying the current models being worked can program whatever you want. I find it hard to believe that the world’s biggest companies, pretty much the entire driver of GDP growth, the driver to current foreign policy, is all missing on this.
Posted by UltimaParadox
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2008
52538 posts
Posted on 2/17/26 at 8:14 pm to
All these companies dumped money on the meta verse, that was going to be the future with all the headsets. Almost 100 billion wasted for something very few used ever used...

Sounds familiar
Posted by CharlesUFarley
Daphne, AL
Member since Jan 2022
1106 posts
Posted on 2/17/26 at 8:15 pm to
quote:

Guess they can send home all those illegals because the white collar US citizens gonna be taking those roofing, carpentry, painting and road construction crew jobs, thank you


We already have robotic lawn mowers, and people who are seriously into the landscaping business already invest a lot in their equipment. Soon they'll have one man crews who show up at your house with an iPhone and map your yard, then deploy multiple machines to do your landscaping. Maybe even transported by auto transport and minimally supervised.
Posted by SloaneRanger
Upper Hurstville
Member since Jan 2014
13782 posts
Posted on 2/17/26 at 8:18 pm to
quote:

You're allowed to represent yourself, and with AI you will see more people choosing to do so, using AI as support.


LOL. AI is regularly preparing motions and briefs with made up case cites.
Posted by GhostofJackson
Speedy Teflon Wizard
Member since Nov 2009
7237 posts
Posted on 2/17/26 at 9:12 pm to
quote:


All these companies dumped money on the meta verse, that was going to be the future with all the headsets. Almost 100 billion wasted for something very few used ever used...

Sounds familiar


If you look at it that way, we should have never spent money on the space program because we didn't get anything out of it. Instead, we have tons of tech advances from the space program.
Posted by Juan Betanzos
New Orleans
Member since Nov 2005
4192 posts
Posted on 2/17/26 at 10:59 pm to
Yeah. Brain surgery
Posted by Sofaking2
Member since Apr 2023
21241 posts
Posted on 2/17/26 at 11:19 pm to
I listened to a CIA agent today saying all of technology we have now was available 10 years ago to the top spy agencies in the world. We are much further along than most people know.
Posted by UltimaParadox
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2008
52538 posts
Posted on 2/18/26 at 10:45 am to
quote:

If you look at it that way, we should have never spent money on the space program because we didn't get anything out of it. Instead, we have tons of tech advances from the space program.


Pretty big difference between the space race and the meta verse race, which yielded zero.

The current AI race has yielded some decent tools, but the capex compared to earnings is turning up very little at this point.

I dont think the govt is stepping in and funding this venture.. or at least the bailout soon
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram