Started By
Message

re: Mickey Mouse copyright expires after 95 years.

Posted on 12/25/23 at 10:15 am to
Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
27472 posts
Posted on 12/25/23 at 10:15 am to
quote:

I think Disney sucks in a lot of ways but “dominance over copyright law”? Mickey is Disney. How does anyone deserve to have the rights to him other than the company that created him?


Allowing the ownership of acts of creative expression in perpetuity would create a hellscape of creative stagnation that I’m not sure some of you are really wrapping your heads around. As has been mentioned already on this thread, most of Disney’s early animation catalogue wouldn’t exist if not for creative works becoming public domain. Or should Disney have been required to pay von Goethe’s family several hundred years later for the rights to depict the story of The Sorcerer’s Apprentice?
Posted by Blizzard of Chizz
Member since Apr 2012
19168 posts
Posted on 12/25/23 at 10:17 am to


Probably 30 years too late, but I’m sure RATT would love to bring this back now that Disney can’t sue them.
Posted by Hangover Haven
Metry
Member since Oct 2013
26955 posts
Posted on 12/25/23 at 10:18 am to
Posted by SalE
At the beach
Member since Jan 2020
2452 posts
Posted on 12/25/23 at 10:21 am to
Air Pirates
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
68904 posts
Posted on 12/25/23 at 10:25 am to

True and very subtle.

This will trip people up and get them sued.
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
91229 posts
Posted on 12/25/23 at 10:28 am to
As a person of Irish heritage I find Mickey Mouse to be offensive and derogatory towards Irish people. Disney and Mickey should be canceled
Posted by soccerfüt
Location: A Series of Tubes
Member since May 2013
66271 posts
Posted on 12/25/23 at 10:29 am to
quote:

Blows my mind how copyright can just expire.
Brings to mind the story (possibly apocryphal) of the sisters whose dad wrote “Happy Birthday” and they never worked a day in their lives.

Mailbox money.

I’m too lazy to look it up, I’m sure Wiki has something on it.
Posted by mdomingue
Lafayette, LA
Member since Nov 2010
31232 posts
Posted on 12/25/23 at 10:31 am to
quote:

True and very subtle.

This will trip people up and get them sued.



Fricken Disney rules the world.
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
140462 posts
Posted on 12/25/23 at 10:33 am to
quote:





Reminds me of the bucees mexican knockoffs my pal S posted a while back
Posted by Tupelo
Member since Aug 2022
1480 posts
Posted on 12/25/23 at 10:34 am to
quote:

Porn will be first out the gate


I can see the title now, "Steamboat's Willie".
Posted by WG_Dawg
Hoover
Member since Jun 2004
86624 posts
Posted on 12/25/23 at 10:40 am to
Chester J Lampwick rolling over in his grave
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
71694 posts
Posted on 12/25/23 at 10:51 am to
quote:

Allowing the ownership of acts of creative expression in perpetuity would create a hellscape of creative stagnation that I’m not sure some of you are really wrapping your heads around. As has been mentioned already on this thread, most of Disney’s early animation catalogue wouldn’t exist if not for creative works becoming public domain. Or should Disney have been required to pay von Goethe’s family several hundred years later for the rights to depict the story of The Sorcerer’s Apprentice?


This. We'd be paying the person who created floors, walls, concrete, ect ect until the end of time.
Posted by efrad
Member since Nov 2007
18657 posts
Posted on 12/25/23 at 11:02 am to
quote:

I think Disney sucks in a lot of ways but “dominance over copyright law”? Mickey is Disney. How does anyone deserve to have the rights to him other than the company that created him?



The people who created the Steamboat Willy cartoon are dead. Nobody at the company named "Disney" had any involvement in the creation of Steamboat Willy.

Why should Americans have to pay anyone for the use of this historical cartoon? Who alive actually deserves payment for the creation of Steamboat Willy?

If we should have to pay descendants of cartoon creators to watch or adapt cartoons from a century ago, you probably think reparations for slavery is a good idea too.
Posted by Schmelly
Member since Jan 2014
14542 posts
Posted on 12/25/23 at 11:03 am to
quote:

Now do all the public domain titles that Disney has made billions off of over the years



There’s a problem with the law, not the people taking advantage of them. Same as taxes
Posted by Schmelly
Member since Jan 2014
14542 posts
Posted on 12/25/23 at 11:04 am to
quote:

Who alive actually deserves payment for the creation of Steamboat Willy?

The COMPANY that OWNS it
Posted by dallastiger55
Jennings, LA
Member since Jan 2010
28013 posts
Posted on 12/25/23 at 11:06 am to
I’m dumb but why can’t Disney just renew it?
Posted by efrad
Member since Nov 2007
18657 posts
Posted on 12/25/23 at 11:10 am to
quote:

There’s a problem with the law, not the people taking advantage of them. Same as taxes



It's not a problem with the law at all.

The public benefited from Disney creating fantastic cartoons based off of public domain titles. Those classic stories belong to humanity, so Disney can make adaptations if they like. There's nothing wrong with that, nor is there anything wrong with Disney profiting from it. And long after the creators of Steamboat Willy are dead, that work, too, will be long to humanity.

The contradiction comes in when the Disney corporation thinks they can profit off of old public domain works they didn't create but should also control other works they didn't create.
Posted by efrad
Member since Nov 2007
18657 posts
Posted on 12/25/23 at 11:13 am to
quote:

The COMPANY that OWNS it



Owns what? What do they physically possess? It's not as if it's an object only one person can possess, an immutable quality for all time.

What you are calling "ownership" -- control of an idea -- is a made up modern construction of copyright law, which always allowed for expiration since the concept was made up.
Posted by WWII Collector
Member since Oct 2018
7186 posts
Posted on 12/25/23 at 11:18 am to
quote:

I think Disney sucks in a lot of ways but “dominance over copyright law”? Mickey is Disney. How does anyone deserve to have the rights to him other than the company that created him?




I was thinking Trademark here... Copywrite is something written, filmed or idea.. or sumsuch
Posted by jmarto1
Houma, LA/ Las Vegas, NV
Member since Mar 2008
34300 posts
Posted on 12/25/23 at 11:19 am to
Look up the Weiss Schwarz Steamboat Willie card...
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram