- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Man Found Not Guilty for Shooting 3 Cops During No-Knock Raid
Posted on 12/14/16 at 10:27 pm to BabyrayS2k
Posted on 12/14/16 at 10:27 pm to BabyrayS2k
quote:
except the part about spending two years in jail for nothing.
That part is about to wchange...he'll sue em civilly and win easy. I predict 2 million
Posted on 12/14/16 at 10:33 pm to stout
Props to Rosas for standing trial LIKE A MAN.
Posted on 12/14/16 at 10:38 pm to knight_ryder
quote:
No-knock warrants are a recipe for disaster
My best friend was shot and killed in the line of duty because they knocked first giving the guy time to prepare himself.
So that goes both ways.
This post was edited on 12/14/16 at 10:40 pm
Posted on 12/14/16 at 10:39 pm to the LSUSaint
quote:
That part is about to wchange...he'll sue em civilly and win easy. I predict 2 million
unfortunately i highly doubt this
Posted on 12/14/16 at 10:42 pm to stout
Hopefully he doesn't get his gun back
Posted on 12/14/16 at 10:46 pm to McCaigBro69
Two years in jail. Life probably ruined.
Posted on 12/14/16 at 10:48 pm to CapperVin
Cops don't serve no-knocks on just anyone and randomly, they had reason to do this. I'm incredibly surprised that if the guy they were after lived with family they did this though it's a recipe for a disaster. But no-knocks are for dangerous guys, so I doubt this dangerous guy was living with completely innocent family members.
Posted on 12/14/16 at 10:53 pm to McCaigBro69
quote:
Sounds like the system worked.
No it didn't.
He still spent years in jail and cost him hundreds of thousands of dollars on attorney fees.
This was an open and shut case that should have never been brought to court by a reasonable prosecutor.
Posted on 12/14/16 at 10:57 pm to SG_Geaux
frick whoever downvoted me. A good man who wanted nothing more than to help his fellow man is dead because of NOT being able to execute a no-knock warrant.
Posted on 12/14/16 at 11:01 pm to SG_Geaux
quote:so they had to raid his house?
frick whoever downvoted me. A good man who wanted nothing more than to help his fellow man is dead because of NOT being able to execute a no-knock warrant.
sorry, but no-knock warrants are BS.
Posted on 12/14/16 at 11:01 pm to the LSUSaint
quote:
That part is about to wchange...he'll sue em civilly and win easy. I predict 2 million
I would spend 2 years in jail for a million a year.
Posted on 12/14/16 at 11:10 pm to stout
There's definitely a need for no-knock warrants IMO. I think they should be a last resort option for arresting dangerous suspects when a less risky arrest method isn't available.
IMO it isn't worth the risk to officers to serve no-knocks for drug searches or as a go-to arrest method for the majority of arrest warrants. Stake out the houses and get these assholes when they're exposed rather than sending officers into a dangerous situation.
Unfortunately the war on drugs has created a paradigm within law enforcement where high risk no-knocks must be carried out as a matter of every day routine in order to preserve drug evidence. The populace and politicians that push the war on drugs can go frick themselves for getting hundreds or thousands of officers killed just to stop druggies from flushing crack down the toilet after realizing the police are outside.
ETA: Forgot to mention that everybody thinking he'll win some massive civil case is quite mistaken. You people realize that acquittals happen every day and defendants don't just get paid off right? The police had a valid warrant and probable cause for the arrest after he shot three of them. If a judge didn't set a bond then good luck trying to sue the court for not having a bond set when you're charged with three counts of attempted murder.
IMO it isn't worth the risk to officers to serve no-knocks for drug searches or as a go-to arrest method for the majority of arrest warrants. Stake out the houses and get these assholes when they're exposed rather than sending officers into a dangerous situation.
Unfortunately the war on drugs has created a paradigm within law enforcement where high risk no-knocks must be carried out as a matter of every day routine in order to preserve drug evidence. The populace and politicians that push the war on drugs can go frick themselves for getting hundreds or thousands of officers killed just to stop druggies from flushing crack down the toilet after realizing the police are outside.
ETA: Forgot to mention that everybody thinking he'll win some massive civil case is quite mistaken. You people realize that acquittals happen every day and defendants don't just get paid off right? The police had a valid warrant and probable cause for the arrest after he shot three of them. If a judge didn't set a bond then good luck trying to sue the court for not having a bond set when you're charged with three counts of attempted murder.
This post was edited on 12/14/16 at 11:14 pm
Posted on 12/14/16 at 11:15 pm to baldona
quote:
serve no-knocks on just anyone and randomly,
They have the wrong address at times, and this has led to innocent deaths.
Doing a no-knock for a drug dealer is just a unnecessary risk.
Posted on 12/14/16 at 11:17 pm to stout
Dude spent two years in jail, and was innocent. fricking pigs.
Posted on 12/14/16 at 11:20 pm to Mung
He wasn't innocent. He did in fact shoot three officers. He had an affirmative defense and was acquitted.
Posted on 12/14/16 at 11:24 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
I find it odd that the greater majority of you posted on the B-quick shooting in a positive and gracious way. The officers shot in this search warrant were doing the same thing. Serving their city, state, and country. I mean, for Christ sake the mans relative was using his residence as a avenue for his dope selling business. You sell drugs you'll eventually get found out, have the cops run up on you in a violent fashion, and possibly change the lives around you. Case in point. All goes back to doing the right thing. Don't sell or do drugs in or around your relatives house and you won't have relatives shooting at cops thinking their home is being invaded.
This post was edited on 12/14/16 at 11:26 pm
Posted on 12/14/16 at 11:39 pm to Huey Lewis
They didn't announce that they were cops, so WTF is he supposed to do? Somebody breaks into your house, with guns? No reason for a no knock warrant. Total bullshite.
Posted on 12/14/16 at 11:47 pm to Mung
Considering the source, I'm sure the officers announced their presence as they were executing their no knock.
This post was edited on 12/14/16 at 11:48 pm
Popular
Back to top


2









