- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Louisiana COVID-19 - May 12, 2020 Update: 32,050 cases - 2,281 deaths - 228,012 tests
Posted on 5/12/20 at 1:50 pm to Stevo
Posted on 5/12/20 at 1:50 pm to Stevo
quote:
going full open will cause a bad spike!
Not if frail people take precautions.
Roughly 70% of America will get infected before this is over.
Unless, those German scientists are correct and 30% of people are naturally immune. Even then that leaves 40%.
Sack up and deal with it.
Rip the band-aid off.
Posted on 5/12/20 at 1:50 pm to RidiculousHype
quote:
Based on your logic, we can't fully open until the virus is completely eradicated, which could be a decade or more.
Not sure where you're getting that from. The goal all along, and it's a legitimate goal, is to prevent hospitals from being overwhelmed. Hospitals and vent availability are fine now. The phased openings are designed to stay ahead of the virus. Even if no vaccine is ever available, we'll eventually develop herd immunity. Trump's Guidelines for Opening Up America are good, and need to be followed. They also allow for a full opening of the economy, but in a phased/staggered approach. You people who want a full open now would do much more harm to the economy that Trump's approach.
Posted on 5/12/20 at 1:52 pm to lsu13lsu
I was most definitely being sarcastic, because I have seen people and taking heads argue to remaining shut down until 2/3 of those things happen.
Posted on 5/12/20 at 1:56 pm to TigersSEC2010
Tuesday is the weekend back log drop day and we only have 235 new cases? Time to fricking open Chili's back up.
Posted on 5/12/20 at 1:58 pm to The Boat
I just saw where Wuhan had their first new cases since they got rid of it. Here we go for Round 3.
Posted on 5/12/20 at 2:00 pm to OysterPoBoy
quote:
I just saw where Wuhan had their first new cases since they got rid of it. Here we go for Round 3.
This just in: they never got rid of it
Posted on 5/12/20 at 2:02 pm to Stevo
quote:
it's a legitimate goal, is to prevent hospitals from being overwhelmed. Hospitals and vent availability are fine now.
They never were in danger of being overwhelmed. In fact a lot of hospital workers have been laid off.
Posted on 5/12/20 at 2:04 pm to YouAre8Up
quote:
They never were in danger of being overwhelmed. In fact a lot of hospital workers have been laid off.
These aren't really connected though.
Posted on 5/12/20 at 2:08 pm to Stevo
quote:
Not sure where you're getting that from. The goal all along, and it's a legitimate goal, is to prevent hospitals from being overwhelmed. Hospitals and vent availability are fine now. The phased openings are designed to stay ahead of the virus. Even if no vaccine is ever available, we'll eventually develop herd immunity. Trump's Guidelines for Opening Up America are good, and need to be followed. They also allow for a full opening of the economy, but in a phased/staggered approach. You people who want a full open now would do much more harm to the economy that Trump's approach.
I see your point. I think where people disagree is how fast that phasing should happen.
On 3-29 the task force said unanimously that we were 2 weeks from peak. Well now it's been over 6 weeks and people are getting frustrated (in some parts of the country) that we aren't further along in the phased reopening than we are.
Posted on 5/12/20 at 2:11 pm to Stevo
quote:
The idiocy on this board never ceases to amaze me
Why? That should not surprise anyone. The idiocy of the OT is very well known. Heck, it's a point of pride for many.
Posted on 5/12/20 at 2:12 pm to Taffeta
quote:
anyone have a graph of original curve projections vs actual
Nope.
But, Musk trolled California governor with one from that state. It was wayyyy off.
Posted on 5/12/20 at 6:34 pm to Privateer 2007
Age/Cases/Deaths/Mortality
<18 493 (8) 2 (0) 0.41%
18-29 3814 (43) 8 (0) 0.21%
30-39 5081 (32) 41 (1) 0.81%
40-49 5435 (32) 85 (0) 1.56%
50-59 6034 (39) 199 (5) 3.28%
60-69 5273 (31) 418 (10) 7.92%
70+ 5920 (50) 1529 (23) 25.83%
Just because I feel like adding this today, percentage of deaths per age bracket for Louisiana:
<18 .08%
18-29 0.3%
30-39 1.8%
40-49 3.7%
50-59 8.7%
60-69 18.3%
70+ 67%
<18 493 (8) 2 (0) 0.41%
18-29 3814 (43) 8 (0) 0.21%
30-39 5081 (32) 41 (1) 0.81%
40-49 5435 (32) 85 (0) 1.56%
50-59 6034 (39) 199 (5) 3.28%
60-69 5273 (31) 418 (10) 7.92%
70+ 5920 (50) 1529 (23) 25.83%
Just because I feel like adding this today, percentage of deaths per age bracket for Louisiana:
<18 .08%
18-29 0.3%
30-39 1.8%
40-49 3.7%
50-59 8.7%
60-69 18.3%
70+ 67%
Posted on 5/12/20 at 6:41 pm to YouAre8Up
The nimrods don’t give a damn about flatten the curve and haven’t in a month. That’s why it isn’t mentioned any longer.
It’s now about agendas and feelings
It’s now about agendas and feelings
Posted on 5/12/20 at 7:03 pm to JJ27
quote:
Age/Cases/Deaths/Mortality
<18 493 (8) 2 (0) 0.41%
18-29 3814 (43) 8 (0) 0.21%
30-39 5081 (32) 41 (1) 0.81%
40-49 5435 (32) 85 (0) 1.56%
50-59 6034 (39) 199 (5) 3.28%
60-69 5273 (31) 418 (10) 7.92%
70+ 5920 (50) 1529 (23) 25.83%
For total infection rate multiply cases by 10, for total fatality divide mortality by 10.
Based on IHME data.
Popular
Back to top

0










