Started By
Message

re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Posted on 7/20/23 at 1:13 pm to
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
30652 posts
Posted on 7/20/23 at 1:13 pm to
I noticed a mod did some cleanup of troll posts in the thread over the last few minutes. I am bad about it too but maybe if we don't feed the trolls the mods won't have to do as much work to clean up and might do it more often.

Posted by northshorebamaman
Mackinac Island
Member since Jul 2009
38393 posts
Posted on 7/20/23 at 1:45 pm to
quote:


I noticed a mod did some cleanup of troll posts in the thread over the last few minutes. I am bad about it too but maybe if we don't feed the trolls the mods won't have to do as much work to clean up and might do it more often.
Or if that's too much work they could always just enforce the no trolling rule. It's mostly the same 5 or 10 guys.


*and I'm not referring to people who are against our involvement and provide genuine arguments supporting their views. I'm talking about the straight up trolls like winston.
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
30652 posts
Posted on 7/20/23 at 1:49 pm to
quote:

*and I'm not referring to people who are against our involvement and provide genuine arguments supporting their views.


I appreciate those people.
Posted by LSUPilot07
Member since Feb 2022
8657 posts
Posted on 7/20/23 at 2:07 pm to
There’s always going to be trolls on this page, it’s just the nature of the beast with war. You have people who take sides and others who are just the crazies. I get the feel that the war is being attempted to be a party line issue instead of a military and world stage implication issue that it really is. I feel like this page’s trolls tries to tie Democrats to wanting the war and Republicans to opposing it. I’m a staunch 100% Republican but I also don’t want war, no one does, but I believe it was the only decision the Ukrainians had. Ukraine was not only one of the Soviet Union’s largest areas in land mass but also they were huge providers to their economy and military with the steel plant in Mariupol, the tank factory in Kharkiv, Antonov aircraft, etc. Putin wanted that back and figured the world wouldn’t lift a finger and call it an internal dispute. Ukraine like their former Soviet bloc countries wants to be separated from Russia in all ways. This is also a very big business investment for the U.S. too in a way. Bringing Ukraine’s industry to the west more money as after the war they will eventually be ordering from several defense companies to westernize its army in order to be accepted into NATO. Just imagine a NATO airbase in Odesa looking right over the Black Sea. The implications of this war are huge.
This post was edited on 7/20/23 at 2:12 pm
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
28765 posts
Posted on 7/20/23 at 2:33 pm to
quote:

I do hope though that Ukrainian high command isn’t neglecting what’s going on up north. Russia massing that amount of troops has to be taken seriously.


Certainly. That kind of troop concentration would be an excellent use of cluster munitions and himars.
Posted by ned nederlander
Member since Dec 2012
5992 posts
Posted on 7/20/23 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

I get the feel that the war is being attempted to be a party line issue instead of a military and world stage implication issue that it really is


No question. This has always been the case. If this invasion happens under trump and trump threw support behind Ukraine, democrats would be sky screaming that we have an unfit commander in chief driving us headlong into world war 3, and the right would be gung go to light up some ruskies.

It’s just a general mistake we commonly make -trying to understand world events through the prism of American Politics or American Race Relations or LSU coaching blunders.
Posted by IAmNERD
Member since May 2017
24344 posts
Posted on 7/20/23 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

If this invasion happens under trump and trump threw support behind Ukraine, democrats would be sky screaming that we have an unfit commander in chief driving us headlong into world war 3, and the right would be gung go to light up some ruskies.

Of course. The same people believing in Nazis and biolabs in Ukraine trashed Obama for not doing anything (as I did too) when Russia took Crimea and the Donbas 9 years ago.
This post was edited on 7/20/23 at 3:11 pm
Posted by StormyMcMan
USA
Member since Oct 2016
4691 posts
Posted on 7/20/23 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

Just imagine a NATO airbase in Odesa looking right over the Black Sea


I mean NATO doesn't really need Ukraine for an airbase in Odesa when we they already have Romania.



quote:

On the territory of Romania, the main focus is on improving the operational capabilities of the national air force bases for reception, deployment and support of tactical and military transport aircraft of allies in the NATO bloc. As
the key objects of the selected airbase kampia of tursi, Fetesti Otopeni and M. kogalniceanu.

A total of 13 civil airfields are planned for major reconstruction by 2020, which, if necessary, will be able to
provide additional opportunities for deployment of the Alliance's aviation units.

To ensure the activity of NATO ships and vessels in the black sea zone, facilities on the territory of the Russian Federation may be used Romania (Constanta and Mangalia) and Bulgaria (Varna and Burgas). Elements are currently being cast
infrastructure of naval bases in accordance with the standards of the Alliance. In this case, the main attention is paid to
it focuses on dredging, reconstruction of berthing facilities, creation of infrastructure for fuel storage and
refueling ships of the Alliance's navies, strengthening security measures at facilities and the surrounding area.

For the transfer of NATO troops and military supplies to the Eastern flank of the Alliance, it is planned to use
the Romanian port of Constanta and the Bulgarian ports of Burgas and Varna.


LINK


Also found this map
This post was edited on 7/20/23 at 3:14 pm
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
21027 posts
Posted on 7/20/23 at 3:11 pm to
quote:

I do hope though that Ukrainian high command isn’t neglecting what’s going on up north. Russia massing that amount of troops has to be taken seriously. They clearly want to take back ground Ukraine took in their last offensive as it humiliated the Russian army to be pushed back as fast as they were. Losing it isn’t an option for Ukraine so hopefully they have sent reserves in that direction to blunt any attacks.


Russia has had about 110,000 total personnel on the area from Kreminna north to the Russian border. They added about another 10,000 troops for their little "counteroffensive."

They have captured part of a suburb of Kupiansk, the town of Novosilevska NNW of Svatove, and some forest west of Kreminna. They've pretty well already been stopped -- they haven't made any progress in days.

Ukraine isn't worried, in the short term, about Russia taking a small town or a few acres of forest up in that area. Their primary goal is to cut the land bridge in the South, and their secondary goal is to take Bakhmut back.
Posted by GOP_Tiger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
21027 posts
Posted on 7/20/23 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

The same people believing in Nazis and biolabs in Ukraine trashed Obama for not doing anything (as I did too) when Russia took Crimea and the Donbas 9 years ago.



I remember back when people claimed that Clinton was involved in the Balkans strictly to wag the dog.
Posted by OutsideObserver
Oceania.
Member since Dec 2022
784 posts
Posted on 7/20/23 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

Rail to any of these ports adds cost, thus takes away money from revenues for Ukrainian internal grain elevators. Even barge transport costs real money. Corn in Iowa is $2 a bushel cheaper than it is at export terminals at Port Allen and below, where the vast majority arrives but much cheaper transport, barges. Sure it is a solution but at a cost.


Cheers for the reply. That is where the feasibility comes in from my perspective, would the added costs make it prohibitive?

While I am sure legally it couldn't be done, using some of those seized Russian assets to offset cost increases would be one way to do it and thwart their attempts at what is essentially extortion.

Edit: Clarity
This post was edited on 7/20/23 at 3:46 pm
Posted by northshorebamaman
Mackinac Island
Member since Jul 2009
38393 posts
Posted on 7/20/23 at 3:27 pm to
quote:



I remember back when people claimed that Clinton was involved in the Balkans strictly to wag the dog.
It didn't help that happened a year after the release of a film titled Wag the Dog that was about a president waging a fictional war in the Balkans to distract from a sex scandal.
Posted by OutsideObserver
Oceania.
Member since Dec 2022
784 posts
Posted on 7/20/23 at 3:37 pm to
quote:

Absent this year's conditions and demands, the prior grain deal allowed Russia to export it's own agricultural and fertilizer products... exempt from U.S. and EU sanctions.

The Russian's hid behind altruism and a concern for global food security. Bull shite. It's about money and their own exports.


Cheers, this is an adjacent article that explores the deal in a bit more detail, interesting how pressure was applied on Russia from North African and Persian Gulf nations to back the deal, and there seems to be a significant import need for agricultural goods to meet their internal needs, notably agricultural machinery parts, seeds for crops and meat in the form of swine and fowl stock.

https://carnegieendowment.org/politika/87576

Essentially the key difference compared to the old grain deal Russia wants SWIFT opened up to them again so it is very much as you said, it is about money - but hey the sanctions aren't working...right?


Posted by Tigris
Cloud Cuckoo Land
Member since Jul 2005
13164 posts
Posted on 7/20/23 at 3:51 pm to


About 6 years ago I was in Bacau looking at an idle chemical plant my company was considering buying (not just no, but hell no). Nato jets were overhead often, the locals told me several times that they were there to keep an eye on the Russians. At the time I thought "but why?", now it's turned out to be a damn good thing to have that resource.
Posted by OutsideObserver
Oceania.
Member since Dec 2022
784 posts
Posted on 7/20/23 at 4:10 pm to
This looks to be the first recorded use of the newly arrived cluster munitions by Ukraine, geolocated as well.

https://twitter.com/Osinttechnical/status/1682040734785101824 - Video

quote:

Krasnohorivka, Donetsk Oblast, Ukrainian forces dropped a salvo of DPICM on a Russian infantry assault towards the town.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
105473 posts
Posted on 7/20/23 at 4:18 pm to
That's gonna leave a mark.
Posted by cypher
Member since Sep 2014
5727 posts
Posted on 7/20/23 at 4:29 pm to
Kirby: Ukraine is using cluster munitions 'effectively'

by Elsa Court and The Kyiv Independent news desk July 21, 2023 12:17 AM

Ukraine has started to use cluster munitions within the last week and is using them "effectively" US National Security Council Coordinator for Strategic Communications John Kirby told reporters on July 20.

The weapons "are actually having an impact on Russia’s defensive formations and Russia’s defensive maneuvering," Kirby added.
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
16110 posts
Posted on 7/20/23 at 5:06 pm to
quote:

(not just no, but hell no).


Soviet era stuff was pure crap even if overbuilt to satisfy their demands for more steel consumption to justify their increase in steel production
Posted by WhereisAtlanta
Member since Jun 2016
847 posts
Posted on 7/20/23 at 5:18 pm to
quote:

Rail to any of these ports adds cost, thus takes away money from revenues for Ukrainian internal grain elevators. Even barge transport costs real money. Corn in Iowa is $2 a bushel cheaper than it is at export terminals at Port Allen and below, where the vast majority arrives but much cheaper transport, barges. Sure it is a solution but at a cost.



All that grain was transported to the ports on trucks, simply redirect this years harvest to a rail hub in Romania, not perfect but no need to send anything to a port in the first place
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
16110 posts
Posted on 7/20/23 at 5:55 pm to
quote:

All that grain was transported to the ports on trucks, simply redirect this years harvest to a rail hub in Romania, not perfect but no need to send anything to a port in the first place


Since the elevator legs seem to be destroyed they will need to import 1000 Pakistanis with shovels and find some portable conveyors to load trucks.
first pageprev pagePage 3064 of 5046Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram