- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Posted on 9/22/22 at 6:11 pm to immobileman
Posted on 9/22/22 at 6:11 pm to immobileman
Bruh, they vaxxed you with chemtrails already.

This post was edited on 9/22/22 at 7:07 pm
Posted on 9/22/22 at 7:41 pm to CitizenK
It is interesting Russia can muster the logistics to grab 300k conscripts from all over a >6 million square mile country on "short notice" but can't get beans and bullets to the front 400 miles from Moscow.
Here they are loading the conscripts up in Yakutsk 5,000 miles away from Moscow.
Twitter
Here they are loading the conscripts up in Yakutsk 5,000 miles away from Moscow.
Posted on 9/22/22 at 8:15 pm to Obtuse1
I would imagine they are haphazardly getting them as far away from their home as possible as quickly as possible and then figure out something..... haphazard is an understatement.
Posted on 9/22/22 at 8:20 pm to Chromdome35
quote:
looked up said tanks and they were first made in 1961. that’s what the russian army is using
Russian is also now using soldiers first made in 1961. The next miles long caravan to Kiev is going to be stopping to piss every 45 minutes. Will be tough to sneak up on them at night though.
Posted on 9/22/22 at 8:30 pm to ned nederlander
ISW Update
quote:
The Kremlin’s heavy-handed approach to partial mobilization may successfully meet the Kremlin’s internal quota of mobilized personnel but is unlikely to generate effective soldiers and is prompting significant domestic backlash for little gain.
quote:
The Kremlin is openly not adhering to its promised conditions for partial mobilization just 24 hours after its September 21 declaration
quote:
Kremlin quotas will likely force local officials to mobilize any men, regardless of their military status, to meet quota numbers
quote:
The Kremlin will also likely mobilize ethnically non-Russian and immigrant communities at a disproportional rate
quote:
The Kremlin’s heavy-handed approach to mobilization is prompting public anger and distrust across Russia.
quote:
The Kremlin likely attempted to downplay a prisoner swap with Ukraine that is deeply unpopular among Russian nationalists and milbloggers by undertaking the swap the same day Putin announced partial mobilization.
quote:
The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) announced that it began negotiations to establish a nuclear safety zone around the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant (ZNPP). Such negotiations are unlikely to significantly ameliorate the situation due to continued Russian efforts to stage provocations at the plant.
quote:
Key Takeaways
The Kremlin’s heavy-handed approach to partial mobilization may successfully meet the Kremlin’s internal quota of mobilized personnel, but is unlikely to generate effective soldiers and is prompting significant domestic backlash for little gain.
The Kremlin is openly not adhering to its promised conditions for partial mobilization.
Kremlin quotas will likely force local officials to mobilize any men, regardless of their military status, to meet quota numbers and will likely incentivize the mobilization of ethnically non-Russian and immigrant communities at a disproportional rate.
The Kremlin likely attempted to downplay a prisoner swap with Ukraine that is deeply unpopular among Russian nationalists and milbloggers by undertaking the swap the same day Putin announced partial mobilization.
IAEA negotiations around the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant are unlikely to significantly improve the situation at the plant and may provide an information opportunity for Russian forces to stage provocations.
Ukrainian forces likely continued limited counteroffensive operations along the Kharkiv-Luhansk Oblast border and continued attacks toward Lyman on September 22.
Ukrainian military officials maintained their operational silence regarding Ukrainian ground attacks in Kherson Oblast on September 22 and reiterated that Ukrainian forces are conducting an operational-level interdiction campaign in Kherson Oblast.
Russian forces conducted limited ground attacks along the frontlines in Donetsk Oblast on September 22.
Russian forces did not conduct any confirmed ground attacks west of Hulyaipole on September 22 and continued routine strikes throughout western Zaporizhia Oblast.
Russian occupation forces are hurriedly setting conditions to hold sham annexation referenda across occupied Ukraine from September 23-27.
Russian officials created polling stations in parts of Russia, ostensibly to enable displaced (in many cases meaning kidnapped) Ukrainian residents of occupied territories to “vote.”
Russian occupation officials in Ukraine likely expect to be forced to provide personnel to meet Russian regional mobilization quotas after the Kremlin annexes occupied Ukrainian territories.
Posted on 9/22/22 at 8:33 pm to immobileman
quote:
Putin
quote:
I truly think he is a good guy
quote:
Get ‘em Putin!
quote:
immobileman
Jesus Christ.
This post was edited on 9/22/22 at 8:36 pm
Posted on 9/22/22 at 8:39 pm to TBoy
quote:the poli board has more support for Russia than actual Russians
I'd guess that is because the people of Russia don't see an invasion of Ukraine as a patriotic mission.
Posted on 9/22/22 at 8:43 pm to immobileman
This is top notch sarcasm
Posted on 9/22/22 at 8:52 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
the poli board
Edit: removed original post. Don’t want to attract the zoo animals to this thread anymore than has already happened
This post was edited on 9/22/22 at 9:01 pm
Posted on 9/22/22 at 9:22 pm to WestCoastAg
quote:
This is top notch sarcasm
I expected at least two sarcastic bowing emojis from you. It is the most worthy of any post ITT.
Posted on 9/22/22 at 9:26 pm to CitizenK
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/4/26 at 5:06 pm
Posted on 9/22/22 at 9:27 pm to StormyMcMan
LINK
I found a really interesting twitter thread on Ukraine's likely plan in the north. I think it's a useful reference as things play out. It's in Dutch, so I'll post what Google Translate has.
He starts with this flowchart:
The top arrow says that the fall of Trots'ke would complicate logistics in northern Luhansk and mean the end of Belgorod as a "war city" supplying the Russian effort.
That's because of the railways.
Look at the map below: the fall of Kupiansk means that Route 1 is now unusable. The fall of Trots'ke (or even putting it under fire control), would mean that Russia would have to use Route 3 to supply northern Luhansk Oblast -- which is untenable.
The second arrow, from Starobils'k, leads to the evacuation of the north of Luhansk Oblast. Ultimately, it probably means a fallback to pre-Feb 24 lines, and it would mark a 2nd major defeat in a short time.
The third arrow, from Severodonetsk, breaks Russian defense in the northern Donbas, threatens the Russian flank of its Donbas offensive, and advances Ukrainian logistics for future attacks on the "peoples' republics."
This guy, Robert Bor, says that (unlike elsewhere) Lyman cannot really be bypassed. He says that Lyman will need to be a Ukrainian base for attacks further east, and that's why Ukraine didn't bypass it to attack Kreminna and/or Svatove.
He also points out that the push towards Trots'ke has already begun, as Ukraine is moving east and the town of Tavil'zhanka is disputed:

I found a really interesting twitter thread on Ukraine's likely plan in the north. I think it's a useful reference as things play out. It's in Dutch, so I'll post what Google Translate has.
He starts with this flowchart:
The top arrow says that the fall of Trots'ke would complicate logistics in northern Luhansk and mean the end of Belgorod as a "war city" supplying the Russian effort.
That's because of the railways.
Look at the map below: the fall of Kupiansk means that Route 1 is now unusable. The fall of Trots'ke (or even putting it under fire control), would mean that Russia would have to use Route 3 to supply northern Luhansk Oblast -- which is untenable.
The second arrow, from Starobils'k, leads to the evacuation of the north of Luhansk Oblast. Ultimately, it probably means a fallback to pre-Feb 24 lines, and it would mark a 2nd major defeat in a short time.
The third arrow, from Severodonetsk, breaks Russian defense in the northern Donbas, threatens the Russian flank of its Donbas offensive, and advances Ukrainian logistics for future attacks on the "peoples' republics."
This guy, Robert Bor, says that (unlike elsewhere) Lyman cannot really be bypassed. He says that Lyman will need to be a Ukrainian base for attacks further east, and that's why Ukraine didn't bypass it to attack Kreminna and/or Svatove.
He also points out that the push towards Trots'ke has already begun, as Ukraine is moving east and the town of Tavil'zhanka is disputed:
Posted on 9/22/22 at 9:31 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
I’ve come to peace that there’s a good chance that’s going to happen
Great! Can you stop repeating the same thing over and over now or nah?
This post was edited on 9/22/22 at 9:32 pm
Posted on 9/22/22 at 9:36 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
I’ve come to peace that there’s a good chance that’s going to happen
Posted on 9/22/22 at 9:37 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
If it does go nuclear, I expect you all to put on a Roman Triumph for me.
If it doesn't then it is damnatio ad bestias, deal?
quote:
I’ve come to peace that there’s a good chance that’s going to happen, but might be a shock for the rest of you.
You have to remember a lot of us lived during and some of us served during the Soviet days, we learned decades ago not to piss ourselves with fear every time some jackass in Moscow uttered the word nuclear.
Posted on 9/22/22 at 9:57 pm to Obtuse1
If Putin was going to nuke Ukraine into submission, then he wouldn't need an extra 300,000 men to try to do it.
If nuking Ukraine were really a serious possibility, then moving 300,000 Russian men into the radiation zone would be a bizarre move.
In short: there's no reason to think that Putin is actually dumb enough to use nukes.
If nuking Ukraine were really a serious possibility, then moving 300,000 Russian men into the radiation zone would be a bizarre move.
In short: there's no reason to think that Putin is actually dumb enough to use nukes.
Posted on 9/22/22 at 11:10 pm to OMLandshark
Do you get scared of your own shadow? I can see you hiding from the UPS man when he rings your doorbell because you think you’re being robbed. Do you just enjoy of thinking of all the possible ways the world can end? As much as you blab about nukes just know even Putin isn’t dumb enough to use that option because he enjoys his lavish lifestyle and he knows if he went that route his life would be over. Mutually assured destruction works. You realize the Russians have been threatening to use nukes from the day they were able to produce a nuclear weapon right?
Posted on 9/22/22 at 11:20 pm to OMLandshark
quote:
If it does go nuclear, I expect you all to put on a Roman Triumph for me. I’ve come to peace that there’s a good chance that’s going to happen, but might be a shock for the rest of you.
Since you have "come to peace" with it, I guess we can expect you to stop posting here as you will be spending your last few days/months out enjoying your remaining time on this Earth right?
Popular
Back to top


2







