- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict
Posted on 9/20/22 at 8:25 am to Jim Rockford
Posted on 9/20/22 at 8:25 am to Jim Rockford
quote:
What baffles me….. in just the air war part of this……imagine replacing the Russian apparent capability with the USA. I don’t think we would even need to send in our Air Force to destroy the Ukraine Air Force. Our missiles combined with our satellites and radar and other electronic capabilities would have 90 percent of their Air Force destroyed in 48 hours. If they flew the remaining fleet it would only be to defect to another country. Military people correct me where I’m incorrect.
you are not wrong except the timeline. spec ops would enter country before hand, find and mark targets on top of targets found on satilite. would be 6-8 weeks.
quote:
For all of Russia's misunderestimating Ukraine, I think they had a very good grasp of its air defenses. They knew they couldn't achieve air superiority, much less air supremacy, without unacceptable losses. So they didn't try very hard, leaving the Russian ground forces to fend for themselves.
It raises the question about American air power if we ever have to fight an all out war with China. Would we really be willing to lose dozens of F22s and F35s? In WWI, the battleship was supposed to be the decisive weapon, but they were so hideously expensive, both sides were reluctant to put them in harm's way. Except for Jutland, they mostly stayed in port.
very first thing we would do would use ships to form a missle defense to protect the US and as much as possibel SK and Japan.
that is not really what we would do though. we would 1st take out there navy and their ability to hit the homeland
at the same time we would take out any all ballistic missle sites that we know about using in country spec ops
then we would sit there and strategically soften them up with missles for 3-6 weeks taking out as much of the air force as possible
then we would spend 6-12 weeks just on air campaign after that and yes we would be ok losing F22/F35 because we would have to be, period.
it would be 3-4 months minimum before first troop even set foot on land outside of spec ops.
Posted on 9/20/22 at 8:27 am to Decatur
quote:
Are we about to see a general mobilization in Russia? Are they about to go all in?
sure send more to be slaughtered. you cant throw low trained personel at a modern battlefield and hope to win just based off that.
not to mention ukraine has hundreds of thousands in training right now in case they are needed.
Posted on 9/20/22 at 8:29 am to Crawdaddy
for the record, the reported UFOs.....yea that US air force
we are 100% testing and observing
we are 100% testing and observing
Posted on 9/20/22 at 8:33 am to Decatur
You can see how it might make sense with this new timeline of attempted incorporation of the Donbas Oblasts next week, which would allow Putin to try to argue that the Russian homeland was being attacked, but they've had numerous failures at this process already and the Ukrainian resistance in those territories will get fierce in the next week if they try to push forward.
ETA (Shaun Walker, The Guardian):
Not that Putin gaf, of course.
ETA (Shaun Walker, The Guardian):
quote:
I’m not a legal scholar but it feels like there may be some legality issues with organising a referendum in three days in the middle of a war on territory you only partially control.
Not that Putin gaf, of course.
This post was edited on 9/20/22 at 8:36 am
Posted on 9/20/22 at 8:36 am to lsu777
quote:
sure send more to be slaughtered. you cant throw low trained personel at a modern battlefield and hope to win just based off that.
Picture of the latest Russian conscripts being trained for fighting in Ukraine

Posted on 9/20/22 at 8:50 am to Decatur
quote:
Are we about to see a general mobilization in Russia? Are they about to go all in?
I really don't think there is enough domestic support for this to happen. Also too much ego
The way I think about it is Iraq and/or Afghanistan. The domestic US population as a whole didn't really care about us going there so there was "support" for it, but if the US all the sudden started having to mobilize for either of them the domestic support would have probably vanished over night.
Posted on 9/20/22 at 9:00 am to StormyMcMan
quote:
The way I think about it is Iraq and/or Afghanistan. The domestic US population as a whole didn't really care about us going there so there was "support" for it, but if the US all the sudden started having to mobilize for either of them the domestic support would have probably vanished over night.
I was against Iraq from the beginning but fully supported Afghanistan. I was out of the military when it popped off but would have "mobilized" had the country asked for it.
The Taliban supported and trained Al Qaeda... They needed to have their arse kicked. Iraq did not support UBL. The invasion was based off a neo-con ideal of democracy building in a region that shuns freedom. We ignored the local politics and thousands died for it. Russia is now making the same mistake
This post was edited on 9/20/22 at 9:01 am
Posted on 9/20/22 at 9:15 am to TigerDoc
Medvedev on Telegram:
quote:
Referendums in Donbass are of great importance not only for the systemic protection of the inhabitants of the LNR, DNR and other liberated territories, but also for the restoration of historical justice.
They completely change the vector of Russia's development for decades. And not only our country. Because after their implementation and the acceptance of new territories into Russia, the geopolitical transformation in the world will become irreversible.
Encroachment on the territory of Russia is a crime, the commission of which allows you to use all the forces of self-defense. But no less important is that after the amendments to the Constitution of our state, not a single future leader of Russia, not a single official will be able to reverse these decisions.
That is why these referendums are so feared in Kyiv and in the West. That is why they need to be carried out.
Posted on 9/20/22 at 9:17 am to StormyMcMan
Do Russian troops feel that the war in Ikraine is fighting for the freedoms of its citizens?
That is what our troops are made to believe.
That is what our troops are made to believe.
Posted on 9/20/22 at 9:20 am to Decatur
quote:
That is why these referendums are so feared in Kyiv and in the West. That is why they need to be carried out.
And here comes the ethnic cleansing of the Donbas. Just like what we saw in Yugoslavia 20 years ago. And the uyghurs in China
This post was edited on 9/20/22 at 9:21 am
Posted on 9/20/22 at 9:52 am to Tigeralum2008
So crazy things are happening: the State Duma has passed a few bills basically paving way for general mobilization and martial law to be declared. The occupied territories of Ukraine have announced votes to join Russia between the 23rd-27th, and now rumors are circulating Putin and the Defense Minister will address the nation tonight.
Posted on 9/20/22 at 9:56 am to Obtuse1
quote:
Some truth slipping into Russian state TV?
Damn, glad she is not in charge. They, RU Forces, might actually be effective with her at the helm. Most sense I have seen a single Russian make, besides those poor bastards on the front lines calling their wives back home.
Posted on 9/20/22 at 10:20 am to Decatur
Haven't seen this confirmed yet by domestic sources, but from @nexta_tv:
quote:
The #US Department of Justice has asked Congress to legalize the transfer of frozen #Russian assets to #Ukraine in response to the announced "referendums".
At least $ 300 billion of such assets are blocked in the United States.
Posted on 9/20/22 at 10:22 am to lsu777
I worry that they will use the referendums to force civilians in the occupied territories to "fight for their country". Basically use them as human shields.
Posted on 9/20/22 at 10:24 am to mmcgrath
They're already using forced conscription in those territories, though that might only be among people who've accepted Russian passports. Wee Wee might be able to help us there.
Posted on 9/20/22 at 10:27 am to Decatur
quote:
Are we about to see a general mobilization in Russia? Are they about to go all in?
I don't think so, for several reasons:
1) Russian popular opinion is not in favor of it. There will be protests if conscripts are sent to Ukraine. There will be more draft-dodging. Even today's news is causing a number of young men to flee the country. I read that a Russian airline actually has a function on the website that allows you to search for any ticket out of Russia.
But, more generally, anti-war sentiment has been subdued in Russia largely because the war has been fought by volunteers and contract soldiers. If you didn't want to fight, you didn't have to fight. A true mobilization would spark real opposition.
2) It's too late to mobilize. Really. The time to mobilize was in March, when it was obvious that the initial attempt to take Kyiv had failed. If it had been done then, those men might be reasonably decent fighters now. But to do a draft at this time would not produce viable soldiers for a long while.
3) Russia now has no one to train these troops. Or lead them. Russia has lost so much of its best units and professional soldiers. Their losses among officers has been crippling.
4) Russia doesn't have equipment for them to use. What, are they going to try to haul some more rusty T-62s out of storage? Russian heavy industries can't efficiently get the foreign parts they need to keep assembly lines running well to make new equipment.
And then, what happens when Russian forces are pushed back across the Dnipro next month? You thought that the 200 pieces of equipment that Russia left behind in Kharkiv Oblast was a lot? In Kherson, the total will be ten times higher. None of those tanks, radars, fuel trucks, etc. are going back over the river with fleeing Russian troops. They will all become the property of the AFU.
So, no, Russia probably isn't going to do a real general mobilization, because that wouldn't work. What's happening now is that Putin is likely trying to give the appearance of doing stuff, to appease critics who are pointing out that Russia is losing the war.
It will also be useful in domestic messaging to claim that "Russia is being attacked" as Ukrainian troops advance.
But today's news is going to galvanize opposition to Russia. The blatant claiming that they just take Ukrainian land is going to damage Russia's relations with India, China, Turkey and others. They can all now see how this war is going to end.
And it's going to cause the West to increase arms deliveries to Ukraine. It's so outrageous that Scholz, Macron, and others will probably be persuaded that it's time to give Ukraine modern, NATO tanks and other armored vehicles.
In sum, Putin felt the need to do this as a result of domestic political pressure, but today's announcements will actually hasten Russia's defeat.
This post was edited on 9/20/22 at 10:29 am
Posted on 9/20/22 at 10:45 am to GOP_Tiger
Just for clarification… the city of Kharkiv has not fallen yet, but the entire province of Kharkiv has. Correct? They are waiting for the remaining Rs to surrender, I assume.
Posted on 9/20/22 at 10:45 am to Decatur
quote:
Are we about to see a general mobilization in Russia? Are they about to go all in?
It appears so.
quote:LINK
The Russian Government has reportedly made changes to its Constitution and other National Laws in the last 24 hours that make it easier for a General Mobilization and Transfer to a War Economy to be ordered within the Country, seems as though they are preparing to go all in.
If Russia goes all in then Biden needs to get off his senile arse and get western fighter jets, SAMs, and tanks to Ukraine ASAP. It will take 3-6 months for Russia to effectively mobilize its forces and get them to the front. So there will be just enough time to train the Ukrainians on the equipment.
Posted on 9/20/22 at 10:47 am to WeeWee
I would be surprised if we don’t already have some “train the trainers” sessions underway on NATO aircraft and tanks.
Posted on 9/20/22 at 10:48 am to GOP_Tiger
Really good post. Some have been calling Russia's current system "shadow mobilization", but if it plays out the way you outline, you might call it "pseudo-mobilization". Putin's control of the media and the political and security state allows him to dictate perception of reality with a Potemkin mobilization for a while and I suppose he's holding out hopes for a Hail Mary of the European winter and energy prices to break the coalition, but if Russia is saying it's fully mobilizing against the Europeans fighting them in Ukraine, it seems like that strategy also takes a hit. If they had been able to keep the gas flowing until November and THEN cut it off, he might really shake them, but as it is, they're adjusting and the European voters will hopefully more easily blame the Russians than their pols.
This post was edited on 9/20/22 at 10:53 am
Popular
Back to top



0





