Started By
Message

re: Latest Updates: Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Posted on 7/28/22 at 1:27 am to
Posted by Chromdome35
Fast lane, behind a slow driver
Member since Nov 2010
8190 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 1:27 am to
You have a strange (kinda weird) obsession with Zelensky.
Posted by StormyMcMan
USA
Member since Oct 2016
4692 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 6:18 am to
quote:

Sorry to intrude but is anyone else hearing 57k Dead Russians?!? My friend in Russia texted that figure yesterday it’s going around like wildfire as an accurate Putin has seen it number.


Ukraine is saying 40k, and apparently US Congress briefing yesterday said 75k KIA and WIA combined so 57k KIA seems high IMO
Posted by cypher
Member since Sep 2014
5754 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 6:50 am to
|
British Defence Intelligence
UPDATE ON UKRAINE 28 July 2022
INTELLIGENCE UPDATE

Ukraine's counter-offensive in Kherson is gathering momentum. Their forces have highly likely established a bridgehead south of the Ingulets River, which forms the northern boundary of Russian-occupied Kherson.

Ukraine has used its new long range artillery to damage at least three of the bridges across the Dnipro River which Russia relies upon to supply the areas under its control. One of these, the 1,000 metre long Antonivsky bridge near Kherson city, was damaged last week. Ukraine struck it again on 27 July 2022 and it is highly likely that the crossing is now unusable.

Russia's 49th Army is stationed on the west bank of the Dnipro River and now looks highly vulnerable. Similarly, Kherson city, the most politically significant population centre occupied by Russia, is now virtually cut off from the other occupied territories. Its loss would severely undermine Russia's attempts to paint the occupation as a success.
Posted by Athanatos
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
8200 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 7:35 am to
How many troops do the Russians have on the west side of the Dnipro river? What kind of long range support is available for the Russians, I mean why can’t they use their artillery advantage to forestall a Russian advance?
Posted by TBoy
Kalamazoo
Member since Dec 2007
28821 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 7:49 am to
quote:

How many troops do the Russians have on the west side of the Dnipro river? What kind of long range support is available for the Russians, I mean why can’t they use their artillery advantage to forestall a Russian advance?

The key factor is that without a supply route, or a viable escape route, whatever the Russians have is all they will get, and every day of fighting wastes those assets. It isn’t that the Russians don’t have a viable force located in that area (I really don’t know any specifics about what is actually there), it’s that they may be limited to a fixed firepower while the Ukrainians have the ability to flow supplies and push forward with pressure.
Posted by cypher
Member since Sep 2014
5754 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 7:51 am to
quote:

What kind of long range support is available for the Russians, I mean why can’t they use their artillery advantage to forestall a Russian advance?


Did you mean "forestall a Ukrainian advance"?
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
16183 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 9:45 am to
The response from my retired A-10 squadron commander friend notes how armor needs bigtime service after 200 hrs (up to speed in RPM) or 8 days means that without supplies the Russian tanks will be useless. Now it makes sense why Russia has dug in its armor along the Kherson Front. Running around when not needed requires a lot more logistical support, fuel, lube oil, and even repairs.
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
45765 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 9:52 am to
quote:

Sorry to intrude but is anyone else hearing 57k Dead Russians?!? My friend in Russia texted that figure yesterday it’s going around like wildfire as an accurate Putin has seen it number.



If you watched the videos of the fighting from Sievierodonetsk the Russia strategy was to shoot a few RPGs at the Ukrainian positions and then charge hoping that the RPGs suppressed enough of the Ukrainians fire to allow them some of the Russian soldiers to reach the Ukrainian positions. According to my sauce(s) in Ukraine, their goal for the Battle of Sievierodonetsk was to delay Russia by 2 weeks and hopefully kill 20,000 Russians. They said that they accomplished their goals because they held the Russians up for 6 weeks and killed over 20,000 Russians. IDK if the 57,000 number is accurate or not, but I would not be surprised if it is close to the real number.
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
16183 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 10:01 am to
I keep seeing estimates from 54k to 59k over the last week.

Severodonetsk was a meat grinder for the Russians. They lost upwards to a 1000 pieces of equipment, including tanks, trucks, artillery and aircraft. Russia did NOT move forward from Severodonetsk but more a pullout by Ukraine from the advance out of Popansa. Logistics really matter and main highway easily attacked would be the reason for the withdrawal. Ukraine had been pounding from a 500 foot elevation covering the open plain behind the city to the east and west of it.

Note that Russia is likely not claiming casualties of personnel coming from areas occupied since 2014 (conscripts with no training and up to 65 years of age) or from Putin's Neo Nazis, the Wagner Group, but only its actual military
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
45765 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 10:12 am to
quote:

More than 75,000 Russians have been killed or injured in the war in Ukraine so far, according to classified estimates from the Biden administration.

The classified briefing, which was first reported by CNN, was provided to lawmakers in the House of Representatives.

Casualty estimates for militaries on both sides are highly speculative, US officials have warned. They often give ranges rather than specific numbers, though just last week, the CIA director estimated that 60,000 Russian soldiers had been killed or injured. Some estimates have gone as high as 80,000 casualties.
LINK

There is definitely some fire behind the smoke of 57,000 casualties.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
37609 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 10:30 am to
quote:

Russia violated an agreement to invade in 2014 right after Chevron, Exxon and Shell each signed multibillion dollar contracts to develop oilfields in Ukraine. This would have killed Russia's main market of Europe for Russia



It is strange this wasn't recognized as the cause of nearly everything that followed.

The timing and location of the big discoveries are conveniently identical to the timing and regions of Ukraine Russia invaded
Posted by Tigeralum2008
Yankees Fan
Member since Apr 2012
17734 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 10:56 am to
TikTok video of Russian missile mishap

That vaunted Russian bear sho is scary
Posted by StormyMcMan
USA
Member since Oct 2016
4692 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 11:00 am to
Have no idea on the validity of this but I

quote:

In the #Kherson region, the Russians mistakenly shot down their own Ka-52 helicopter.

??General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine


quote:

Meanwhile, #Ukraine is looking for a Russian soldier who shot down an allied K-52 helicopter in the Kherson region on July 26.

According to Ukrainian law, Russian servicemen have the right to receive rewards for shooting down an enemy helicopter.

LINK
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
16183 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 12:38 pm to
All journalists are morons regardless of political leaning or lack of. When a journalist gets something correct, it is by mistake.
Posted by Biko
Member since Jul 2022
470 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 12:52 pm to
Aren't you tired of blaming Trump and Putin?

"Aint you tired miss Hilly ? "
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
90420 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

No linky?


Here’s your link you fricking putin apologist piece of shite.

I guarantee all of you have done business with these banks. fricking war criminal.

CNBC

quote:

Oleg Ustenko, economic advisor to Zelenskyy, said the Ukrainian government believes banks, such as JPMorgan, HSBC and Citi, are aiding the Kremlin’s war efforts in Ukraine through financing companies that trade oil with Russia.



quote:

Asked directly if he wants to see these banks prosecuted for war crimes, Ustenko said: “Exactly.”
This post was edited on 7/28/22 at 1:06 pm
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
16183 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 1:08 pm to
Closet case for sure
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
16183 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 1:10 pm to
Haven't you tasted enough Putin cream or is it his chocolate you prefer
Posted by AGGIES
Member since Jul 2021
12658 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 1:16 pm to
Good to see the link. I wanted to know the source of the comment, and you provided it.

Your commentary has got to be sarcasm bc I’m the furthest thing from a Putin apologist.
Posted by AGGIES
Member since Jul 2021
12658 posts
Posted on 7/28/22 at 1:21 pm to
quote:

That vaunted Russian bear sho is scary


Ukraine has got to be laughing while they’re sitting there watching Russia shoot down it’s own aircraft and blow up faulty missile launchers.
first pageprev pagePage 1423 of 5046Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram