- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: LA House passes bill banning hand help cell phones while driving
Posted on 5/24/21 at 10:43 am to Mike da Tigah
Posted on 5/24/21 at 10:43 am to Mike da Tigah
Yay, more regulation!
I agree with ole Robby Carter on this one too but more for the hate of never ending laws that will accomplish nothing.
I agree with ole Robby Carter on this one too but more for the hate of never ending laws that will accomplish nothing.
Posted on 5/24/21 at 10:44 am to Mike da Tigah
quote:
and they suggested the bill would put a burden on the poor by requiring them to buy new equipment.
If they can afford a cell phone, then there is no excuse for not being able to afford one of those hand held stands you put on your dashboard.
I you can't afford both(again, no real excuse) then don't use your phone in the car at all. Simple/
Posted on 5/24/21 at 10:45 am to chryso
quote:
They cant even enforce the laws that stop people from texting while driving and they think they will enforce this?
EXACTLY.
Texting and surfing the web/social media (which is already banned) are the distractions. The physical act of holding the phone against your ear isn't the distraction. The distraction is simply not paying attention while you are talking...which doesn't go away just because you are using bluetooth.
Essentially the law says you cannot even HOLD a cell phone in your hand while driving (with a few exceptions). I get the sentiment. I really do. But this proposed law is RIPE for abuse in pretextual stops
Posted on 5/24/21 at 11:28 am to xXLSUXx
quote:
o all an officer has to say is they saw you on your cell phone? How is this enforceable?
It’s just a money grab. California had this for years. You stop at a light, a cop walks by, if you touch your phone the cop signals you over and you get a $300 ticket and a giant red flag on your driving record if you have to be insured for your work.
It’s never the a-hole weaving in lanes distracted while driving. It’s 99% checking an email at a red light. Broome is going to set up task force after task force in every St George neighborhood to fleece as much as she can.
Posted on 5/24/21 at 11:50 am to Mike da Tigah
Police forces will be able to raise more revenue that way.
Posted on 5/24/21 at 11:54 am to Mike da Tigah
I have two phones... one for work and a personal phone which is connected to my vehicles bluetooth. Guess I'm fricked? 
Posted on 5/24/21 at 11:57 am to funnystuff
quote:
I get where you’re coming from as far as the core sentiment, and I agree in principle with the need to minimize distractions. But the distinction between physically holding a cell phone and speaking through a Bluetooth system seems extremely arbitrary.
It’s fairly well-documented that holding a phone to your ear is only marginally more distracting than having a conversation over Bluetooth. The larger issue is that it ties up one of your hands, which means you can’t use that hand to drive. But yes - from a pure reaction time standpoint it’s not that much different.
That being said, I think this may be kind of missing the point of the proposed legislation. I think most folks agree that texting, reading TD, etc. is way worse than talking in your phone. But if there are “acceptable” and “unacceptable” reasons to use your phone in your hand while driving, it becomes impossible to enforce. The proposed law basically says if you’re using your phone in your hand while driving, it’s against the law.
It’s not really about the distinction between handheld and Bluetooth phone calls - it’s more of an attempt to draft a law against texting & driving that is actually enforceable since the law would no longer distinguish between texting, posting on TD, using Google Maps, or talking to someone on speaker. All of these actions would now fall into the same category of handheld phone usage while driving.
Posted on 5/24/21 at 12:06 pm to CatfishJohn
quote:
They need to shut off text features while cars are in motion or something.
So how does it know if you are driving or riding?
Posted on 5/24/21 at 12:20 pm to lostinbr
Gotcha, that makes a lot more sense than the other poster who responded. I can see the validity if that’s the argument. Thanks 
Posted on 5/24/21 at 12:38 pm to Mike da Tigah
Most vehicles before 2010 did not come equipped with bluetooth capabilities. Hell, before my first iPhone in 2008, I had never bluetoothed anything.
I recently bought my mother, my GF and another co-worker $30 bluetooth car FM transmitters for their pre-2010 cars that allows their calls to use their car speakers. I could no longer deal with their more-often-than-daily "speaker-phone-while-driving" crappy calls.
I recently bought my mother, my GF and another co-worker $30 bluetooth car FM transmitters for their pre-2010 cars that allows their calls to use their car speakers. I could no longer deal with their more-often-than-daily "speaker-phone-while-driving" crappy calls.
Posted on 5/24/21 at 12:39 pm to Mike da Tigah
quote:+1
Driving is a privilege and having a cell phone is a luxury,
Posted on 5/24/21 at 12:41 pm to xXLSUXx
quote:
So all an officer has to say is they saw you on your cell phone? How is this enforceable?
It'll be used most of the time in accident investigation
Posted on 5/24/21 at 12:48 pm to xXLSUXx
quote:
So all an officer has to say is they saw you on your cell phone? How is this enforceable?
I mean what do you think our police state relies upon? Actual evidence?
Posted on 5/24/21 at 12:50 pm to upgrayedd
C Denise is a shite human being.
Posted on 5/24/21 at 12:52 pm to Mike da Tigah
Just great.
Now I gotta hold my phone with my feet while I drive.
Now I gotta hold my phone with my feet while I drive.
Posted on 5/24/21 at 1:46 pm to Mike da Tigah
What’s the status of the “weed” bill? Have we heard anything?
Thanks
Thanks
Posted on 5/24/21 at 2:03 pm to Mike da Tigah
quote:
Neither driving, nor cell phones are human rights. Driving is a privilege and having a cell phone is a luxury,
So you are OK with the state taking away your ability to drive and ability to use a cell phone?
Times have changed, it is a human right to be able to travel, it is a human right to be able to communicate. Just because we have improved ways to travel and communicate doesn't give the state the power to restrict those rights. They may try to take them, but that doesn't make it right.
Try being less big government authoritarian.
Posted on 5/24/21 at 2:04 pm to chryso
quote:
They cant even enforce the laws that stop people from
killing each other
Posted on 5/24/21 at 2:42 pm to Mike da Tigah
They love passing laws that restrict our freedom but NEVER pass laws granting freedom.
Posted on 5/24/21 at 2:47 pm to jcaz
If they got iPhones they got headphones with a mic in the box. It says hands free, not wireless or Bluetooth.
Popular
Back to top


0












