Started By
Message

re: Kyle Rittenhouse Trial Discussion Thread

Posted on 11/18/21 at 11:24 pm to
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
37373 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 11:24 pm to
quote:

Honestly if I knew the general public knew I was member of jury I would vote guilty, no way am I putting family at risk for some random dude.

How much family could a cuck like you have?
Posted by Ross
Member since Oct 2007
47827 posts
Posted on 11/18/21 at 11:26 pm to
quote:

Honestly if I knew the general public knew I was member of jury I would vote guilty, no way am I putting family at risk for some random dude.



I'm sure your family will be proud of the father that threw an innocent teenager to an angry mob to save his sorry arse because he is a pathetic and spineless coward.

Way to lead by example.
This post was edited on 11/19/21 at 9:46 am
Posted by beauchristopher
Member since Jan 2008
71843 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 12:19 am to
quote:

Honestly if I knew the general public knew I was member of jury I would vote guilty, no way am I putting family at risk for some random dude.


That's disgusting.
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
44127 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 12:27 am to
quote:

Honestly if I knew the general public knew I was member of jury I would vote guilty


This is one of the most disgusting takes I’ve seen on this board. I
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
149387 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 12:29 am to
quote:

Honestly if I knew the general public knew I was member of jury I would vote guilty, no way am I putting family at risk for some random dude.

the responses to this
Posted by tigersownall
Thibodaux
Member since Sep 2011
16621 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 12:30 am to
Please move out of the United States.
This post was edited on 11/19/21 at 12:32 am
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
52886 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 12:39 am to

quote:

Grain of salt pure usual with him, but Jack Posobiec is hearing it’s 6-6 split. Very much grain of salt, but if he’s right that’s bad.


Why would it be any more right than the report that it was 10-2, with the two holdouts being over concerns of violence.


I hate parroting posts from proven bullshitters but oh, it’s okay. I said “with a grain of salt.”
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
35004 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 12:56 am to
quote:

Honestly if I knew the general public knew I was member of jury I would vote guilty, no way am I putting family at risk for some random dude.

If you voted guilty, the ghosts of January 6th would visit you, and trespass on your property and picket in your front yard without the proper permits. Then they skin you and eat you. I'd rather deal with pencil armed bird legged antifas and blms, than murderous right wing picketers.

Think about it. Umbrellas and laser pointers -vs- being picketed to death then skinned and eaten.
Posted by JDPndahizzy
JDP
Member since Nov 2013
6918 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 6:24 am to
Today has got to be verdict day, right?
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
72870 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 6:28 am to
quote:

Honestly if I knew the general public knew I was member of jury I would vote guilty, no way am I putting family at risk for some random dude.


for the sake of this country let’s hope you’re never apart of a jury for this impactful of case AND more importantly, that you don’t procreate.
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
141175 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 6:35 am to
quote:

Honestly if I knew the general public knew I was member of jury I would vote guilty,


I hope you don’t have kids. I’d hate for a kid to look at their parent see disappointment and smell shame.
Posted by FredBear
Georgia
Member since Aug 2017
16797 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 6:36 am to
quote:

the responses to this




Do the responses amuse you because you think that person is just trolling or do you think purposely finding an innocent person guilty is funny?
Posted by joshnorris14
Florida
Member since Jan 2009
46660 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 6:39 am to
quote:

Why would it be any more right than the report that it was 10-2, with the two holdouts being over concerns of violence.


Because it's fundamentally different.

The first report was that the count was actually 10-2. The second report (which has now been picked up by more sources) is that the defense THINKS it's 6-6. Both things can be true,
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
41190 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 6:41 am to
Because he’s ok with the logic used to arrive at the conclusion.
Posted by Sus-Scrofa
Member since Feb 2013
10412 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 6:42 am to
quote:

I hope you don’t have kids. I’d hate for a kid to look at their parent see disappointment and smell shame


If he does have kids, I hope they never get falsely accused of something. Their dad won't have their back if a jury sells them out for their own perceived safety.
Posted by BruslyTiger
Waiting on 420...
Member since Oct 2003
4760 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 7:31 am to
quote:

Honestly if I knew the general public knew I was member of jury I would vote guilty, no way am I putting family at risk for some random dude.

I hope that you don't have a family. Either way you should get yourself sterilized right now so you don't risk it.
Posted by kengel2
Team Gun
Member since Mar 2004
33443 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 7:32 am to
quote:

Honestly if I knew the general public knew I was member of jury I would vote guilty, no way am I putting family at risk for some random dude.



WTF is wrong with you? Youre a bitch.
Posted by Mr Clean
Power I-Formation
Member since Aug 2006
53058 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 7:41 am to
quote:

Also, I always thought film inside courtroom wasn’t allowed, what makes cases where it is allowed different?


Congrats on the dumbest post of November
Posted by Areddishfish
The Wild West
Member since Oct 2015
6434 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 7:48 am to
quote:


Today has got to be verdict day, right?


On the Rekeita stream the other day, a lady who was a prosecutor once said that she had a case that once took 10 days of deliberation.

She also mentions a case where there was always one or two holdouts no matter what the evidence showed and it went through three hung juries.
Posted by Ingeniero
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2013
21768 posts
Posted on 11/19/21 at 7:50 am to
Everything I've read from lawyers (or people who claim to be) on r/law said it's a total crapshoot on how long deliberations will be and what the jury is thinking, from their experience. They all think the evidence point to acquittal but you been never know. It's the legal equivalent of the coaching changes board.
Jump to page
Page First 102 103 104 105 106 ... 115
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 104 of 115Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram