- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 11/30/17 at 7:49 pm to East Coast Band
quote:Not guilty, makes perfect sense.
But in a police interrogation, Garcia Zarate admitted to firing the gun
Posted on 11/30/17 at 7:49 pm to OSoBad
All of the jurors need to be hanged. Or, we let some Mexican kill someone close to each juror "accidentally" and see what they want to have done with an illegal then.
Posted on 11/30/17 at 7:50 pm to LSUJML
quote:
If that were my daughter I’d not only go after him but the jury too
Execution style
Bullet to the head no questions asked
Posted on 11/30/17 at 7:51 pm to East Coast Band
Wow, this is horrible. I hate it for the family. I know a guilty verdict wouldn't have changed what happened, obviously, but maybe could have helped provide a tiny bit of closure.
Why does California seem to have a problem convicting people who are obviously guilty. This POS even admitted to it. Part of me feels it's an "F U" from the jury, sort of like the O.J. case. Which is horrible and makes a mockery of our justice system.
Why does California seem to have a problem convicting people who are obviously guilty. This POS even admitted to it. Part of me feels it's an "F U" from the jury, sort of like the O.J. case. Which is horrible and makes a mockery of our justice system.
Posted on 11/30/17 at 7:53 pm to upgrayedd
quote:Ha! You're wrong! This isn't possible, just listen to the dems who will tell you so. It's not like he's done it 5 times before. That was just made up by the conservative media to try and push an agenda.
He'll be deported, then return within a couple months.
Posted on 11/30/17 at 7:53 pm to landhawg
Does California have responsive verdicts? Also the bullet apparently richoucheted off the ground first. Not sure how this wasn’t negligent homicide.
Posted on 11/30/17 at 7:55 pm to landhawg
Posted on 11/30/17 at 7:58 pm to jdeval1
The thing that I don't understand is that they said he wasn't guilty of negligent homicide because he didn't know what he was doing was dangerous. But then they said he was guilty of felon in possession of a firearm even though it was supposedly wrapped up and he didn't know what it was.
It sounds like the jury basically asked themselves what the most minimum charge they could give him so they didn't completely lose face in the public eye.
It sounds like the jury basically asked themselves what the most minimum charge they could give him so they didn't completely lose face in the public eye.
Posted on 11/30/17 at 8:00 pm to upgrayedd
How that isn't even manslaughter is mind boggling. I guarantee you that if he wasn't an illegal it would have been.
Posted on 11/30/17 at 8:02 pm to jdeval1
An illegal in CA, which has declared its idiotic self a 'sanctuary state.' I guess it wasn't a sanctuary for Kate!
Posted on 11/30/17 at 8:02 pm to Dizz
quote:At the very least, that's what it should have been.
Not sure how this wasn’t negligent homicide.
However, while I'm not exactly sure of what would have to be the case for a murder charge, I feel like he should have got some kind of murder charge. Simply because he fired the gun towards people. The fatal shot may have ricocheted off the ground, but why was he firing a gun in the direction of people anyways? Even if he was "shooting at a seal",you don't fire a gun towards a crowd of people.
I get it that even if he was trying to shoot a seal and it ricocheted off the ground and hit Kate and killed her, that it was probably "technically" negligent homicide. What I don't get is how someone can't be charged with murder if they're shooting guns into a crowd. That's more than just negligence, IMO.
This post was edited on 11/30/17 at 8:05 pm
Posted on 11/30/17 at 8:03 pm to Strannix
quote:
So the jury found he had zero criminal responsibility for her death???
That is pretty shocking.
It was at least some level of manslaughter.
Posted on 11/30/17 at 8:04 pm to East Coast Band
San Fransisco is the worst.
Posted on 11/30/17 at 8:06 pm to jdeval1
quote:
How that isn't even manslaughter is mind boggling. I guarantee you that if he wasn't an illegal it would have been.
They take gun crimes seriously in CA unless you're one of their heroic illegal immigrants. Then you can kill someone and get away with it.
Posted on 11/30/17 at 8:06 pm to saint tiger225
i would be intent played a large role in this trial.
Posted on 11/30/17 at 8:07 pm to East Coast Band
Well, he was found not guilty because the prosecutors tried to charge him with the wrong charges....shame on them for doing a shitty job.
Since when do we deport people instead of having them pay for their crimes against our society?
Since when do we deport people instead of having them pay for their crimes against our society?
Posted on 11/30/17 at 8:07 pm to jdeval1
This is why everyone needs to report to jury duty, act as “progressive” as possible, and render some sweet guilty verdicts on these dirt bags.
Popular
Back to top


0







