- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Justin Trudeau announces Canada is banning assault-style weapons
Posted on 5/3/20 at 10:57 am to FLObserver
Posted on 5/3/20 at 10:57 am to FLObserver
quote:
these pictures of worst case scenarios from wars of past
I don’t normally jump all up in gun debates but I can’t let this comment go. People act as if government massacres of unarmed civilians is some ancient history. If people were quoting a massacre in 400AD in this argument I would scoff. But WWII was recent whether you want to admit it or not. People are still alive from then. It’s one generation away. Pol Pot and other government massacres are even more recent.
And don’t give me that argument of “your rifle can’t stop the government.” Because a bunch of cave dwellers with AK-47’s have been holding off the US Military for almost 20 years now.
Do I think I will need to take up arms against a tyrannical US Government? frick no. Do I like knowing I have the means to do so if needed? frick yes. Last thing, this is the US of A and not any of those other countries, I don’t give a frick what they do but don’t say “it works there we should do it.” We are #1 for a reason and it isn’t from following others.
0
Posted on 5/3/20 at 11:00 am to fallguy_1978
quote:I’ll give y’all hunting and self defense...
don't know about Canadian laws but deer hunting isn't the intent of the 2nd amendment.
Posted on 5/3/20 at 11:05 am to FLObserver
quote:
I'm not for banning all guns but dang is it not proven in every mass murder events in the U.S. or any other country that some type of automatic weapon was used?
Huh?
Handguns make up the majority of mass shootings
Posted on 5/3/20 at 11:07 am to td01241
quote:you’re going to see the impact of this 50-100 years down the line. Gun control laws and plans don’t change things immediately. Canada still has their weapons and will still have mass shootings, but a black market will form for illegal weapons that over time will funnel them up to the rich
Anyone who is going to murder people isn’t going to obey this law anyway.
This post was edited on 5/3/20 at 11:11 am
Posted on 5/3/20 at 11:08 am to FLObserver
quote:
I'm not for banning all guns but dang is it not proven in every mass murder events in the U.S. or any other country that some type of automatic weapon was used?
quote:
How many people have died up in the U.s. over the last 30 years from these mass shootings? but heaven forbid they go after your 50 round clip rifle
I’m embarrassed for you and your ignorance right now.
Posted on 5/3/20 at 11:23 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
I’m embarrassed for you and your ignorance right now.
It never fails with these guys. I think that’s one of gun owners biggest pet peeves.... if these turds want to limit a constitutional right, at least have a clue of WTF you are trying to ban or limit.
Posted on 5/3/20 at 11:54 am to RLDSC FAN
Why would they want to ban assault weapons?
Posted on 5/3/20 at 11:57 am to FLObserver
quote:
How many people have died up in the U.s. over the last 30 years from these mass shootings?
Huge number. Right up there with bathtub injuries and accidental self-asphyxiation.
99% of gun control advocates are just looking to piss off the sort of person they imagine gun owners to be (rednecks, conservatives... whatever). People seldom really analyze their own motives, though.
Posted on 5/3/20 at 11:58 am to chalmetteowl
quote:
you’re going to see the impact of this 50-100 years down the line.
No you're not.
This is a political panic move.
Posted on 5/3/20 at 12:03 pm to FLObserver
quote:
I'm not for banning all guns but dang is it not proven in every mass murder events in the U.S. or any other country that some type of automatic weapon was used?
Automatic ehhh? What a fricktard you are.
Posted on 5/3/20 at 12:06 pm to FLObserver
quote:
I'm not for banning all guns but dang is it not proven in every mass murder events in the U.S. or any other country that some type of automatic weapon was used?
The most opinionated soy boys regarding gun rights are usually retarded.
Posted on 5/3/20 at 12:07 pm to FLObserver
quote:
You guys melt when a country bans / limits guns and bring up all these pictures of worst case scenarios from wars of past . England, japan, australia and now canada have some type of gun control. I mean they are not 3rd world countries last i checked.
I'm not for banning all guns but dang is it not proven in every mass murder events in the U.S. or any other country that some type of automatic weapon was used?
Is it not wrong for governments to look at ways to limit these mass murder events that have multiplied in recent years. How many people have died up in the U.s. over the last 30 years from these mass shootings? but heaven forbid they go after your 50 round clip rifle Let the downvotes begin you bunch of rednecks
Wow. You managed to check just about every typical clueless gun-grabbing idiot box with just one post.
Impressive.
Posted on 5/3/20 at 12:08 pm to Centinel
She's already abandoned the thread.
Posted on 5/3/20 at 12:33 pm to FLObserver
BUMP.
This level of ignorance deserves to be seen by all.
then takes a parting shot because a) he knows his points are shite. b) he's a little bitch.
This level of ignorance deserves to be seen by all.
quote:
You guys melt when a country bans / limits guns and bring up all these pictures of worst case scenarios from wars of past . England, japan, australia and now canada have some type of gun control. I mean they are not 3rd world countries last i checked.
I'm not for banning all guns but dang is it not proven in every mass murder events in the U.S. or any other country that some type of automatic weapon was used?
Is it not wrong for governments to look at ways to limit these mass murder events that have multiplied in recent years. How many people have died up in the U.s. over the last 30 years from these mass shootings? but heaven forbid they go after your 50 round clip rifle
then takes a parting shot because a) he knows his points are shite. b) he's a little bitch.
quote:
Let the downvotes begin you bunch of rednecks
Posted on 5/3/20 at 12:34 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
She's already abandoned the thread
ohh it's a woman.
i was raised not to hit a woman but this bitch deserves it.
Posted on 5/3/20 at 12:50 pm to FLObserver
quote:
but heaven forbid they go after your 50 round clip rifle
You wear socks and sandals, don’t you?
Posted on 5/3/20 at 12:52 pm to RLDSC FAN
He is such a massive phaggot
Posted on 5/3/20 at 1:00 pm to Fat and Happy
I am not a red neck. I hardly view myself as a staunch republican either. I have never been hunting. I don’t like fishing.
But I am an NRA member
And I own guns because they are fun to have, fun to shoot, I live in a dangerous city and know that if the extremely rare event were to happen where I needed to defend my life or the life of anyone in my home I have the right and the ability to do so and not cower I’m hopeless fear and wait for the police to arrive. But that is just a fringe benefit. You can not have a tyrannical police state that is effective in oppressing a population if that population is armed. You can’t convince me to get on a train to some unknown location without a fight. You can’t convince me to provide quarter to potentially hostile people without a fight. You can’t take my property without a fight. You can’t take my children without a fight. You can’t take my wife without a fight. You can’t tread on me without a fight.
The second guarantees the first. There is no first without the second.
But I am an NRA member
And I own guns because they are fun to have, fun to shoot, I live in a dangerous city and know that if the extremely rare event were to happen where I needed to defend my life or the life of anyone in my home I have the right and the ability to do so and not cower I’m hopeless fear and wait for the police to arrive. But that is just a fringe benefit. You can not have a tyrannical police state that is effective in oppressing a population if that population is armed. You can’t convince me to get on a train to some unknown location without a fight. You can’t convince me to provide quarter to potentially hostile people without a fight. You can’t take my property without a fight. You can’t take my children without a fight. You can’t take my wife without a fight. You can’t tread on me without a fight.
The second guarantees the first. There is no first without the second.
This post was edited on 5/3/20 at 1:01 pm
Posted on 5/3/20 at 1:10 pm to RLDSC FAN
Good for him.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News