- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Justin Trudeau announces Canada is banning assault-style weapons
Posted on 5/1/20 at 2:43 pm to cgrand
Posted on 5/1/20 at 2:43 pm to cgrand
quote:
it states in the article you didn’t read that there would be a government buy back
I'd be like Ron White. "Yes sir, Rolex didn't make very many of these, because they just didn't have many buyers at $20,000 per rifle. But you said you want to buy it, so..."
0
Posted on 5/1/20 at 2:44 pm to RLDSC FAN
They don't even need to put it to a vote, can simply add any firearm to the ban list by executive order. There are some that are saying this isn't enough and want all handguns banned as well.
Posted on 5/1/20 at 2:45 pm to troyt37
You can buy semi-auto .308 rifle that looks it is for hunting and put a 20 round mag in it. Any semi auto hunting rifle can quickly be reloaded. Shotguns can have 12 round mags.... stupid
Posted on 5/1/20 at 2:59 pm to Clames
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/10/20 at 1:15 pm
Posted on 5/3/20 at 8:40 am to RLDSC FAN
Posted on 5/3/20 at 8:49 am to RLDSC FAN
We ought to loosen our restrictions on weapons.
Posted on 5/3/20 at 9:35 am to RLDSC FAN
1. This is fricked up because they're seemingly blaming the last mass shooting on an assault rifle when they haven't even said what type of gun was used.
2. Since they require registration of these guns, they know right where to go to get them.
This is 1000% the route the left wants to take. They want your guns and will baby step their way into taking them. Trudeau has also said he's thinking of taking these same measures when it comes to handguns.
BTW, this was done by EO and not by parliament.
2. Since they require registration of these guns, they know right where to go to get them.
This is 1000% the route the left wants to take. They want your guns and will baby step their way into taking them. Trudeau has also said he's thinking of taking these same measures when it comes to handguns.
BTW, this was done by EO and not by parliament.
Posted on 5/3/20 at 9:39 am to MeridianDog
quote:
Every time I drove into Canada, they stopped me at the crossing and asked if I had a gun. I think the law is an American can't bring a gun (Other than hunting?) into Canada.
You can have some pistols as well but must fill out a form at the border.
Posted on 5/3/20 at 9:42 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
So racist to assume the black one is scary.
Explains his choice of Halloween costumes.
Posted on 5/3/20 at 9:44 am to cgrand
quote:
as is the M1A
They have Norinco M1A knockoffs everywhere in Canada
Posted on 5/3/20 at 9:48 am to upgrayedd
quote:
1. This is fricked up because they're seemingly blaming the last mass shooting on an assault rifle when they haven't even said what type of gun was used.
This tells me they they didn’t say why type of weapon was used because it didn’t fit the narrative.
Posted on 5/3/20 at 9:51 am to Darth_Vader
Last I heard they haven't released the type of weapon used. Not sure if they said what type it was since I last looked. But I have to agree. If this was one of those scary guns, they likely would've said by now.
Posted on 5/3/20 at 9:52 am to RLDSC FAN
Toronto police took down a knife-wielding slasher the other day.
Time for Justy to ban knifes - what a putz.
Time for Justy to ban knifes - what a putz.
Posted on 5/3/20 at 9:58 am to upgrayedd
quote:
Last I heard they haven't released the type of weapon used. Not sure if they said what type it was since I last looked. But I have to agree. If this was one of those scary guns, they likely would've said by now.
Exactly. There would be extensive reporting on the shooting and endless mentions of the “assault rife” that was used.
We see it here in America. If there is a mass shooting with (a) white male perp and (b) he used an “assault rifle” the story will dominate the new cycle for days or even weeks. If the mass shooting lacks those two factors it’s quickly pushed aside since it can’t be used to push the narrative.
Posted on 5/3/20 at 10:10 am to RLDSC FAN
You guys melt when a country bans / limits guns and bring up all these pictures of worst case scenarios from wars of past . England, japan, australia and now canada have some type of gun control. I mean they are not 3rd world countries last i checked.
I'm not for banning all guns but dang is it not proven in every mass murder events in the U.S. or any other country that some type of automatic weapon was used?
Is it not wrong for governments to look at ways to limit these mass murder events that have multiplied in recent years. How many people have died up in the U.s. over the last 30 years from these mass shootings? but heaven forbid they go after your 50 round clip rifle
Let the downvotes begin you bunch of rednecks 
I'm not for banning all guns but dang is it not proven in every mass murder events in the U.S. or any other country that some type of automatic weapon was used?
Is it not wrong for governments to look at ways to limit these mass murder events that have multiplied in recent years. How many people have died up in the U.s. over the last 30 years from these mass shootings? but heaven forbid they go after your 50 round clip rifle
Let the downvotes begin you bunch of rednecks This post was edited on 5/3/20 at 10:12 am
Posted on 5/3/20 at 10:33 am to FLObserver
quote:
I'm not for banning all guns but dang is it not proven in every mass murder events in the U.S. or any other country that some type of automatic weapon was used?
No. Get your shite together. You are one of the same tards that knows nothing about firearms, but thinks they know what's best for the rest of us.
quote:
Is it not wrong for governments to look at ways to limit these mass murder events that have multiplied in recent years. How many people have died up in the U.s. over the last 30 years from these mass shootings? but heaven forbid they go after your 50 round clip rifle
Not enough to give up my rights. And if government is serious about saving lives they will look at other avenues instead of guns.
This post was edited on 5/3/20 at 10:45 am
Posted on 5/3/20 at 10:38 am to RLDSC FAN
I am actually for this. Canada has a lot of great resources and potentially one of the most lucrative shipping lanes through the thawing northwest passage. There may come a time when we need to go in take Canada. Most of them live near the US border and without much of a military and a reduction in weapons they would be extremely easy to pacify. Im not saying we need to invade them, but the weaker they are the better it is for us.
Posted on 5/3/20 at 10:44 am to FLObserver
quote:Way less than have by handguns but we don’t want to ban those do we?
How many people have died up in the U.s. over the last 30 years from these mass shootings?
Spoiler Alert: the left wants to ban those too
This post was edited on 5/3/20 at 10:45 am
Posted on 5/3/20 at 10:45 am to FLObserver
quote:
that some type of automatic weapon was used?
I’m guessing you don’t know the difference between automatic and semi auto
Posted on 5/3/20 at 10:48 am to BlackPawnMartyr
quote:
but the weaker they are the better it is for us
loved your conclusion 
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News