- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: JFK....Did Oswald Act Alone?
Posted on 2/3/24 at 9:43 am to Pandy Fackler
Posted on 2/3/24 at 9:43 am to Pandy Fackler
quote:Why do you suppose Hinckley's brother was scheduled to have dinner with Daddy Bush's son the night after the shooting?
Hinckley shoots Regan. Regan lives. Hinckley goes to the nut hut. Story over.
Now imagine this. Same exact situation except...Regan dies and Hinckley finds a way to kill himself in custody.
Now let us all have loads of fun making up believable conspiracies about who really killed the greatest President in my lifetime.
quote:
The Hinckleys and the Bushes have been friendly for decades, going back to the days when both families set down stakes in the dusty town of Midland, Texas, a magnet for the children of wealthy, East Coast families seeking to cash in on the oil boom.
The Hinckleys were donors to Poppy Bush’s political campaigns over the years, and they gave to support the first, unsuccessful bid for Congress of the young George W. Bush, in 1978. The families lived close to each other, they socialized; I saw indications that, at one point, they may have shared the same lawyer.
LINK
As to the OP, didn't Daddy Bush say he couldn't remember where he was when he heard the news that Kennedy was assassinated? And wasn't he spotted in Dallas that day?
And wasn't Grampa Bush's business assets frozen by the government because he was doing business with the Nazi's during WWII?
Ahhh, those Bushs.
0
Posted on 2/3/24 at 9:46 am to Jim Rockford
quote:
quote:
"Lincoln" and "Kennedy" each have seven letters.
Both presidents were elected to Congress in '46 and later to the presidency in '60.
Both assassins, John Wilkes Booth and Lee Harvey Oswald, were born in '39 and were known by their three names, composed of fifteen letters.
Booth ran from a theater and was caught in a warehouse; Oswald ran from a warehouse and was caught in a theater.
Both of the presidents' successors were named Johnson and born in '08.
Both presidents were shot in the head and on a Friday.
Lincoln had a secretary named Kennedy who warned him not to go to Ford's Theatre. Kennedy had a secretary named Lincoln who warned him not to go to Dallas.
Both Oswald and Booth were killed before they could be put on trial.
Posted on 2/3/24 at 9:53 am to Pandy Fackler
quote:That's the point. They DIDN'T depend on him. He was just the patsy.
And then what do they do? They take all of their resources, all of their careful and meticulous planning. All of their hopes for success and put it in the hands of who?
Lee Harvey Oswald, that's who. A disaffected malcontent, who was the 60's version of an incel or some sort of post office shooter. A moron. A failure at everything he tried to be in life. A man who had no success at anything. But this powerful group of elites is gonna say "Here Harv, you got this. Go get 'em".
Yeah, sure.
You're making their point better than they are.
Posted on 2/3/24 at 10:19 am to TX Tiger
I usually side with Oswald was a lone gunman and lone actor based on a few different things.
1) He already attempted an assassination on a general earlier in the year.
2) There didn't seem to be any sort of elaborate plan as he just got that job a month before they announced any sort of JFK parade route in front of that building. I think this was more of a crime of opportunity than anything else.
3) After killing the president, Oswalt then kills a cop without even thinking about it. The guy was obviously not all there.
1) He already attempted an assassination on a general earlier in the year.
2) There didn't seem to be any sort of elaborate plan as he just got that job a month before they announced any sort of JFK parade route in front of that building. I think this was more of a crime of opportunity than anything else.
3) After killing the president, Oswalt then kills a cop without even thinking about it. The guy was obviously not all there.
Posted on 2/3/24 at 10:21 am to subMOA
quote:
I don’t see how that shot was possible without some very very serious training. If it was him, and only him- he was just very lucky.
The shot was less than 100 yards. Really not that hard at all for anyone that has been in the Marines.
Posted on 2/3/24 at 10:36 am to RedHawk
But why does Oswald say he’s going to be out of the country from Oct to Dec of 1963, when he applies for a passport. Supposedly he does go to Mexico and uses an alias.
Posted on 2/3/24 at 10:54 am to Torbemsti80
Vincent Bugliosi's Reclaiming History is a good read. If what he says is true, explains a lot of things that had led me to believe it was some grand scheme, rather than the simple fact of the matter that two unhinged assholes did something that is still being talked about.
Posted on 2/3/24 at 11:02 am to Pandy Fackler
quote:
would've simply Epstiened him.
That was not how the Maffia did things back then. If they could have had it their way, they would have shot Oswald as was walking through an airport, not the basement of a PoPO Station. As it was, they settled for what they could get.
Capiche?
Posted on 2/3/24 at 2:39 pm to MeridianDog
quote:
If they could have had it their way, they would have shot Oswald as was walking through an airport,
That's been known to work!
Posted on 2/3/24 at 2:51 pm to JodyPlauche
quote:
That's been known to work!
Posted on 2/3/24 at 2:56 pm to RedHawk
quote:
I usually side with Oswald was a lone gunman and lone actor based on a few different things.
1) He already attempted an assassination on a general earlier in the year.
2) There didn't seem to be any sort of elaborate plan as he just got that job a month before they announced any sort of JFK parade route in front of that building. I think this was more of a crime of opportunity than anything else.
3) After killing the president, Oswalt then kills a cop without even thinking about it. The guy was obviously not all there.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KH3F7rT_eNQ
Watch Oliver Stone's "through the Looking Glass" and you will have no doubt that he was not alone.
Posted on 2/4/24 at 6:52 pm to GetmorewithLes
No and it's so obvious. If he had acted alone by 2024 all the files would be open.
Why do you think they want to bury the Seth Rich files for than 50 years.
Why do you think they want to bury the Seth Rich files for than 50 years.
Posted on 2/4/24 at 6:59 pm to Torbemsti80
I'll start this by saying I honestly have no clue how many people (or who those people are) were involved, but...
about the only thing for sure we know is that we know for definitive fact what wounds happened to what people.
I watched a show where they set up the shooting and had someone duplicate the shots.
there wasn't a single shot they attempted from anywhere other than the book depository that didn't inflict major wounds that we know didn't happen.
most of the ones they tried from the grassy knoll would also have killed or at least severely wounded Jackie (which we know didn't happen).
all of the ones from farther forward would have also shattered the windshield (which we know didn't happen).
Was it Oswald on the 6th floor? hell if I know.
but the only way to achieve the specific wounds we know happened, and ONLY those wounds, was to shoot from that vantage point.
quote:
There have been so many theories about who was on the grassy knoll as well.
about the only thing for sure we know is that we know for definitive fact what wounds happened to what people.
I watched a show where they set up the shooting and had someone duplicate the shots.
there wasn't a single shot they attempted from anywhere other than the book depository that didn't inflict major wounds that we know didn't happen.
most of the ones they tried from the grassy knoll would also have killed or at least severely wounded Jackie (which we know didn't happen).
all of the ones from farther forward would have also shattered the windshield (which we know didn't happen).
Was it Oswald on the 6th floor? hell if I know.
but the only way to achieve the specific wounds we know happened, and ONLY those wounds, was to shoot from that vantage point.
Posted on 2/4/24 at 7:04 pm to doubleb
quote:
It’s obvious that LBJ, the mafia, the CIA, the Russians, and the Cubans all conspired to take out Kennedy.
You misspelled Marcelo and Trafficante.
Posted on 2/4/24 at 7:09 pm to dietcoke7
quote:
JFK was hit by rounds from two different directions. No doubt.
except that in the 60 years since the shooting, nobody has been able to duplicate a shot from a different direction without also inflicting damage that did not happen in '63.
you can't hit JFK's head from Grassy Knoll without that same bullet also hitting Jackie.
Posted on 2/4/24 at 7:15 pm to Torbemsti80
quote:Yes
JFK....Did Oswald Act Alone?
Just stop people, to continue shows a lack of both intellect and wisdom.
Posted on 2/4/24 at 7:17 pm to Torbemsti80
Obviously not. CIA had him killed as he had advanced Parkinson's.
Posted on 2/4/24 at 8:13 pm to Torbemsti80
Supposedly, John Kennedy's motorcade through Dallas, which was to go directly down Main Street and onto the Stemmons Freeway, was changed at the last minute to turn of Houston Street, and then Elm Street.
Why is this supposed to be sinister? Because the route down Elm Street takes the limo near the Grassy Knoll, where a shooter was supposedly stationed. It also takes the motorcade near other buildings (such as the Dal-Tex) were shooters could be hidden, supposedly creating a "triangulation of crossfire."
Why is this supposed to be sinister? Because the route down Elm Street takes the limo near the Grassy Knoll, where a shooter was supposedly stationed. It also takes the motorcade near other buildings (such as the Dal-Tex) were shooters could be hidden, supposedly creating a "triangulation of crossfire."
This post was edited on 2/4/24 at 8:14 pm
Posted on 2/4/24 at 8:55 pm to Torbemsti80
Did he act alone? Personally, I believe there are a lot of coincidences and when it comes to investigations, there are no coincidences.
Could he have acted alone? 100%. It doesn’t take rocket science to take down an important person. Stray bullets have taken out countless innocent people so what makes us so blind to the fact that it simply takes any random crazed individual with a gun and a couple bullets to do it? Which is exactly what they would want us to believe, which in itself is too coincidental, assuming “they” is the government or some form of deep state.
My personal belief has evolved on this topic over the years. Iused to be of the opinion that Oswald acted alone but seeing what the government has done to Donald Trump over the past 7 years, I’ve become considerably more open to the idea that the government had JFK killed.
Could he have acted alone? 100%. It doesn’t take rocket science to take down an important person. Stray bullets have taken out countless innocent people so what makes us so blind to the fact that it simply takes any random crazed individual with a gun and a couple bullets to do it? Which is exactly what they would want us to believe, which in itself is too coincidental, assuming “they” is the government or some form of deep state.
My personal belief has evolved on this topic over the years. Iused to be of the opinion that Oswald acted alone but seeing what the government has done to Donald Trump over the past 7 years, I’ve become considerably more open to the idea that the government had JFK killed.
Posted on 2/5/24 at 7:27 am to RedHawk
quote:
The shot was less than 100 yards. Really not that hard at all for anyone that has been in the Marines.
Oswald made the kill with that POS Carcano and a fricked up air gun scope ? No way, never happened.
Page 6 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News