- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message

James Webb Space Telescope hit by larger than expected micrometeoroid
Posted on 6/9/22 at 9:41 pm
Posted on 6/9/22 at 9:41 pm
quote:
NASA’s new powerful space observatory, the James Webb Space Telescope, got pelted by a larger than expected micrometeoroid at the end of May, causing some detectable damage to one of the spacecraft’s 18 primary mirror segments.
The impact means that the mission team will have to correct for the distortion created by the strike, but NASA says that the telescope is “still performing at a level that exceeds all mission requirements.”
Since its launch, JWST has already been hit by at least four different micrometeoroids, according to a NASA blog post, but all of those were small and about the size of what NASA expected the observatory to encounter.
A micrometeoroid is typically a small fragment of an asteroid, usually smaller than a grain of sand. The one that hit JWST in May, however, was larger than what the agency had prepared for, “likely less than .1 millimeter,” a NASA spokesperson told The Verge in an email. NASA admits that the strike, which occurred between May 23rd and May 25th, caused a dimple in the mirror and a “marginally detectable effect in the data,” which engineers are continuing to analyze.
Engineers do have the capability to also maneuver JWST’s mirror and instruments away from showers of space debris, if NASA can see them coming. The problem, though, was that this micrometeoroid was not part of a shower, so NASA considers it an “unavoidable chance event.” Still, the agency is forming an engineering team to come up with ways to potentially avoid or lessen the effects of micrometeoroid strikes of this size.
LINK
I frickin swear, hit before the first pictures could even be released
Posted on 6/9/22 at 9:43 pm to BurningHeart
I wonder if their comprehensive policy will cover that?
Posted on 6/9/22 at 9:43 pm to BurningHeart
By a micrometeorite?!? Those are way too tiny to have that much impact on its pictures....
EDIT: I meant because you can find them on your roof. NASA had to have known that was a possibility. How was it not more protected or durable.
EDIT: I meant because you can find them on your roof. NASA had to have known that was a possibility. How was it not more protected or durable.
This post was edited on 6/9/22 at 9:45 pm
Posted on 6/9/22 at 9:44 pm to BurningHeart
quote:
micrometeoroids
Do you think the other, normal sized meteoroids poke fun at them?
This post was edited on 6/9/22 at 9:44 pm
Posted on 6/9/22 at 9:45 pm to LegendInMyMind
the best part is that they have nipples too. 
Posted on 6/9/22 at 9:46 pm to supadave3
We know a thing or two ‘cause we’ve seen a thing or two
Posted on 6/9/22 at 9:46 pm to jennBN
quote:
the best part is that they have nipples too.
Pics?
Posted on 6/9/22 at 9:49 pm to jennBN
quote:
How was it not more protected or durable.
Uhhh, have you NOT seen the space junk video? Even a paint chip could cop off your head traveling at orbital velocity.
Posted on 6/9/22 at 9:50 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
Im gonna need to see this video. Link?
Posted on 6/9/22 at 9:51 pm to BurningHeart
quote:
A micrometeoroid is typically a small fragment of an asteroid, usually smaller than a grain of sand.
the fact that they can even detect something that small way out there, is amazing...
and the fact that there has only been 4 instances of it happening shows how absolutely vast the universe is...
Posted on 6/9/22 at 9:53 pm to jennBN
quote:
NASA had to have known that was a possibility
They did.
They accounted for multiple of these strikes and multiple mirror failures.
Posted on 6/9/22 at 9:54 pm to jennBN
quote:
micrometeorite
Does this classification start at 5’9” or 5’7”?
I get micro and mini confused…
Posted on 6/9/22 at 9:58 pm to BurningHeart
quote:
I frickin swear, hit before the first pictures could even be released
agrred.. that sux...
Posted on 6/9/22 at 10:00 pm to BurningHeart
quote:
I frickin swear, hit before the first pictures could even be released
But it's not going to mess up its ability to take amazing pictures, right?
Posted on 6/9/22 at 10:04 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
I don't know whether to hate you or appreciate you for linking that...i feel rickrolled and flattered all at the same time
Posted on 6/9/22 at 10:09 pm to hg
quote:
and the fact that there has only been 4 instances of it happening shows how absolutely vast the universe is
That’s 4 with one causing permanent damage before this thing has really got going. Not great odds for the long term.
This post was edited on 6/9/22 at 10:11 pm
Posted on 6/9/22 at 10:10 pm to supadave3
quote:
I wonder if their comprehensive policy will cover that?
Only if the micrometeoroid gave the telescope HPV.
Posted on 6/9/22 at 10:12 pm to jennBN
quote:
By a micrometeorite?!? Those are way too tiny to have that much impact on its pictures....
EDIT: I meant because you can find them on your roof. NASA had to have known that was a possibility. How was it not more protected or durable.
Sounds like they should've had you project manage the whole thing
Back to top

8









