- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Its just a License Plate Reader
Posted on 8/11/26 at 10:46 am to Stinger_1066
Posted on 8/11/26 at 10:46 am to Stinger_1066
quote:
Did you consider that his reply may have been sarcastic?
Did you consider taking 13 seconds and clicking on their profile, to see multiple comments defending these intrusions
Posted on 8/11/26 at 10:48 am to Salmon
quote:
Its not that we don't understand that China has interests in competing with US AI capabilities, its that we also understand that the US is heavily invested in AI and the "anti AI data center is just Chinese propaganda" is very clearly propaganda itself to quell the anti AI data center sentiment
whenever the usuals repeat the same thing in every single thread, it immediately tells me that there was some type coordinated social media campaign that put out that particular talking point
Exactly.
There's also a similar amount of evidence that china has poured millions/billions into influencing anti-ev and anti-renewables sentiment in the US (two industries that china is very openly trying to become the dominant world supplier, with the US being the only real potential competitor). Somehow that never happened and you're crazy if you think china would do such a thing according to those same people.
Posted on 8/11/26 at 10:55 am to geauxturbo
It may annoy you, but I fail to see where the constitutional violation is.
1) You have zero expectation of privacy in public.
2) The tag is already registered under someone's name.
3) Insurance likewise
4) Your driver's license is actually state property.
I get that it is a different level of exposure, but tell me what danger these flock cameras put you in that you were not already subject to?
If someone can give me an actual clear and present danger, I am open to changing my opinion.
1) You have zero expectation of privacy in public.
2) The tag is already registered under someone's name.
3) Insurance likewise
4) Your driver's license is actually state property.
I get that it is a different level of exposure, but tell me what danger these flock cameras put you in that you were not already subject to?
If someone can give me an actual clear and present danger, I am open to changing my opinion.
Posted on 8/11/26 at 10:58 am to Willie Stroker
quote:Like four of them on an overpass on I-10 (Pedersen Road) that track every plate and device that leads to more than 10,000 homes with a value at a minimum of 300k, South of I-10 off of Texas Heritage Parkway? It sure as shite hasn't solved any vehicular robberies, or stolen Chevy/GMCs. Crimes get solved because cops pull over the right car at 2AM, as Fulshear PD has repeatedly posted. It's not ALPR that's getting anything done. We have almost no property crime as it is, but that intersection alone has multiple cameras. The latinos building houses all over the area aren't stealing shite.
transit routes to and from neighborhoods where cars have been broken into and stolen.
I get scanned six times on the way to and from the gym I go to in Katy three exits down I-10. For what?
Posted on 8/11/26 at 11:01 am to BrodyDad
quote:
but tell me what danger these flock cameras put you in that you were not already subject to?
Monitor and record your movements and tie them to an individual (flock disagrees because they don't record who is in the car)
Flock then claims they aren't responsible for the ownership as they don't run the system.
They do store all of the info and tie it together then package and sell your data.
It isn't privacy, it is you being sold. You are the product.
This post was edited on 8/11/26 at 11:02 am
Posted on 8/11/26 at 11:06 am to geauxturbo
We just had 6 officers suspended due to abuse of the flock cameras.
Posted on 8/11/26 at 11:08 am to Salmon
quote:I wasn't being like that. I don't know how u have time to look into all these things, but it helps me the info you shared. Thanks
Your disingenuousness is noted.
Posted on 8/11/26 at 11:09 am to Puffoluffagus
quote:Were they trying to track their spouses or was it part of a criminal
We just had 6 officers suspended due to abuse of the flock cameras.
investigation?
Posted on 8/11/26 at 11:13 am to Salmon
quote:
their business model is data collection for governments
Productive data. Every single database doesn’t simply attempt to collect every piece of data. You prioritize by benefit because you don’t want useless clutter or data collection points you cannot monetize.
Posted on 8/11/26 at 11:25 am to Willie Stroker
quote:
Productive data.
Sure.
People are just understandably suspicious what our government believes to be "productive data".
Popular
Back to top

0






