Started By
Message

re: Its just a License Plate Reader

Posted on 8/11/26 at 10:46 am to
Posted by MoarKilometers
Member since Apr 2015
21385 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 10:46 am to
quote:


Did you consider that his reply may have been sarcastic?

Did you consider taking 13 seconds and clicking on their profile, to see multiple comments defending these intrusions
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
41830 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 10:48 am to
quote:

Its not that we don't understand that China has interests in competing with US AI capabilities, its that we also understand that the US is heavily invested in AI and the "anti AI data center is just Chinese propaganda" is very clearly propaganda itself to quell the anti AI data center sentiment

whenever the usuals repeat the same thing in every single thread, it immediately tells me that there was some type coordinated social media campaign that put out that particular talking point


Exactly.

There's also a similar amount of evidence that china has poured millions/billions into influencing anti-ev and anti-renewables sentiment in the US (two industries that china is very openly trying to become the dominant world supplier, with the US being the only real potential competitor). Somehow that never happened and you're crazy if you think china would do such a thing according to those same people.
Posted by BrodyDad
Member since Dec 2025
350 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 10:55 am to
It may annoy you, but I fail to see where the constitutional violation is.

1) You have zero expectation of privacy in public.

2) The tag is already registered under someone's name.

3) Insurance likewise

4) Your driver's license is actually state property.

I get that it is a different level of exposure, but tell me what danger these flock cameras put you in that you were not already subject to?

If someone can give me an actual clear and present danger, I am open to changing my opinion.
Posted by LemmyLives
Texas
Member since Mar 2019
17502 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 10:58 am to
quote:

transit routes to and from neighborhoods where cars have been broken into and stolen.
Like four of them on an overpass on I-10 (Pedersen Road) that track every plate and device that leads to more than 10,000 homes with a value at a minimum of 300k, South of I-10 off of Texas Heritage Parkway? It sure as shite hasn't solved any vehicular robberies, or stolen Chevy/GMCs. Crimes get solved because cops pull over the right car at 2AM, as Fulshear PD has repeatedly posted. It's not ALPR that's getting anything done. We have almost no property crime as it is, but that intersection alone has multiple cameras. The latinos building houses all over the area aren't stealing shite.

I get scanned six times on the way to and from the gym I go to in Katy three exits down I-10. For what?
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
79650 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 11:01 am to
quote:

but tell me what danger these flock cameras put you in that you were not already subject to?


Monitor and record your movements and tie them to an individual (flock disagrees because they don't record who is in the car)

Flock then claims they aren't responsible for the ownership as they don't run the system.

They do store all of the info and tie it together then package and sell your data.



It isn't privacy, it is you being sold. You are the product.
This post was edited on 8/11/26 at 11:02 am
Posted by Puffoluffagus
Savannah, GA
Member since Feb 2009
6504 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 11:06 am to
We just had 6 officers suspended due to abuse of the flock cameras.
Posted by Recognizable Poster
Geaux Tigers
Member since Mar 2026
1227 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 11:08 am to
quote:

Your disingenuousness is noted.
I wasn't being like that. I don't know how u have time to look into all these things, but it helps me the info you shared. Thanks
Posted by Recognizable Poster
Geaux Tigers
Member since Mar 2026
1227 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 11:09 am to
quote:

We just had 6 officers suspended due to abuse of the flock cameras.
Were they trying to track their spouses or was it part of a criminal
investigation?
Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
17022 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 11:13 am to
quote:

their business model is data collection for governments

Productive data. Every single database doesn’t simply attempt to collect every piece of data. You prioritize by benefit because you don’t want useless clutter or data collection points you cannot monetize.
Posted by Salmon
I helped draft the email
Member since Feb 2008
86652 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 11:25 am to
quote:

Productive data.


Sure.

People are just understandably suspicious what our government believes to be "productive data".
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram