Started By
Message

re: Its just a License Plate Reader

Posted on 8/11/26 at 1:28 pm to
Posted by BrodyDad
Member since Dec 2025
427 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 1:28 pm to
quote:

Yes. That is their stance.
Flock sells the cameras, maintains the records, maintains access, sells the service.
Then claims they own nothing.


Right. So can you point me to any reliable evidence or documentation that they are selling info gathered from the cameras?
Posted by Dawgfanman
Member since Jun 2015
26535 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 1:29 pm to
quote:

Right. So can you point me to any reliable evidence or documentation that they are selling info gathered from the cameras?


Not all LPRs are flock. Some companies definitely sell the data, it’s purchased by insurance companies for investigations.
Posted by BrodyDad
Member since Dec 2025
427 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 1:34 pm to
quote:

Not all LPRs are flock. Some companies definitely sell the data, it’s purchased by insurance companies for investigations.


Once again, not what my cursory glance is showing. Can you point me toward documented evidence that this is happening?
Posted by Dawgfanman
Member since Jun 2015
26535 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 1:36 pm to
Posted by BrodyDad
Member since Dec 2025
427 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 1:47 pm to
quote:

LINK


Looks like they sell equipment directly to companies so it is not data that is coming from government sources. Kinda creepy, but still you have zero expectation of privacy in a public setting.
Posted by Dawgfanman
Member since Jun 2015
26535 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

Looks like they sell equipment directly to companies so it is not data that is coming from government sources. Kinda creepy, but still you have zero expectation of privacy in a public setting.


Their business is selling data. The users are govt, insurance, banks, and various investigators. It’s creepy and I didnt say people have an expectation of privacy. I don’t think most people know about such companies and the amount of data about them that is available to LEO and non LEO agencies.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21849 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

You have zero expectation of privacy in public.


The supreme court disagrees with this statement. (Specifically Jones, and then reaffirmed by Chatrie bar warrantless tracking on a dragnet scale).

quote:

someone can give me an actual clear and present danger, I am open to changing my opinion.


For the moment let's ignore the constitution, and stalking concerns (which seem to prevalent near everywhere they have been installed...), how many innocent people getting held up at police gunpoint over erroneous flock reads, seems dangerous to the average citizen?

There was even one instance last week where a woman was pulled over in one jurisdiction, weapons drawn at her and her family over an erroneous flock entry, and because the municipality forgot to take it down, it happened again in the neighboring jurisdiction. She's essentially been banished from travelling anywhere because of some lazy flock entry.
This post was edited on 8/11/26 at 2:00 pm
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
80356 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 2:01 pm to
Pornhub stores, markets, and made money off videos uploaded to their servers.

They were found guilty of sex trafficking because if videos they claimed they didn't own.
Posted by done dancing
South Louisiana
Member since Apr 2016
267 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 2:02 pm to
Not true. But keep repeating the lie until it becomes the truth.
Posted by done dancing
South Louisiana
Member since Apr 2016
267 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 2:04 pm to
They can't.
Posted by done dancing
South Louisiana
Member since Apr 2016
267 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 2:05 pm to
You make too much sense. You'll be mocked
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
80356 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 2:05 pm to
Any and every flock camera is an example of a private company marketing, controlling, storing, and selling the video system for a profit.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21849 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 2:11 pm to
quote:

This is mostly the reason the public is able to participate in conversations about the balance of utilization and privacy. They valued privacy and public discussion of the boundaries.


I mean I can think of three instances off the top of my head that they flat out lie to their consumers. 1)"you own the data" except their Terms and Conditions explicitly say they have an irrevocable license to use said data, indefinitely on collection. 2)"we have never been hacked" there's a hilarious video online of a flock rep under oath in the Virginia legislature trying to claim this, while then (under questioning) admitting multiple people have gained access illicitly to their video feeds, live, with audible laughs of hilarity in the background. 3)"We just take pictures of license plates" except the image stores a searchable database of every person in the car, searchable by clothing, skin color, symbols, bumper stickers, marks, scratches etc.

In fact you don't need need a car or license plate to search it- for anyone curious, Google "Flock Freeform", it's even on their website.

quote:

Search With Natural Language

Type what you’re looking for, such as “man in blue shirt and cowboy hat” or “dark SUV with rear bumper damage.” Then review relevant visual matches across enabled video feeds, with vehicle results also available from LPR systems.

?

?

Video and LPR, All in One Place

Review person-related video search results from enabled video feeds alongside vehicle results from video and LPR systems in one interface.

Search Beyond Your Own Cameras

When authorized and where sharing is enabled, search shared camera footage from participating agencies, campuses, businesses, or neighboring properties to help identify leads across approved partner networks.




Flocks website- Flock Freeform
This post was edited on 8/11/26 at 2:17 pm
Posted by BrodyDad
Member since Dec 2025
427 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

The supreme court disagrees with this statement. (Specifically Jones, and then reaffirmed by Chatrie bar warrantless tracking on a dragnet scale).


Those cases are easily distinguishable as they involved in Jones cops putting a GPS device on an individual car and in Chatrie, by trying to go around Jones by using the subject's cell phone GPS data. In both cases SCOTUS required a warrant.

In this case, there isnt individualized surveillance. Every car passing by a point is subject to the LPR. Much like you have to stop every car coming through a roadblock.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21849 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 3:06 pm to
quote:

In this case, there isnt individualized surveillance. Every car passing by a point is subject to the LPR. Much like you have to stop every car coming through a roadblock.


Except flock creates a heat map of every vehicle in the system, tracking where every car goes. This has been admitted by flock. How can you say it's not individualized when Flock admits they do it?

LINK

quote:

OSHKOSH (NBC 26) — The Oshkosh Common Council rescinded its contract with Flock Safety after learning the company's automated license plate readers can create "heatmaps" to track daily driving patterns.

Oshkosh Police Chief Dean Smith notified council members on Wednesday that statements from Flock were inconsistent regarding the capabilities of their automated license plate readers, or ALPRs.

"The trust was shaken," Joseph Stephenson said.




quote:

Stephenson, an Oshkosh Common Council member, initially approved an extension for Flock but changed his position on Wednesday.

"Many of us were under the impression that the system's capabilities were more limited in scope and functionality," Stephenson said.

The inconsistency centers on Flock's ability to create heatmaps, which can average out where a vehicle travels most on a day-to-day basis.

"Yes, so you would be able to see on a map kind of which camera someone's going by most frequently," Stephenson said.

Josh Thomas, chief communications officer at Flock Safety, confirmed the system's mapping capabilities.




Don't believe me, believe what flock is telling you.
Posted by America250
Member since Jun 2026
396 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 3:33 pm to
The State of Indiana has no restrictions regarding if and when cops view flock data. Their names can be hidden as well.

That guy should run for sheriff. I'd bet he would win.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
80356 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

"Many of us were under the impression that the system's capabilities were more limited in scope and functionality," Stephenson said.

The inconsistency centers on Flock's ability to create heatmaps, which can average out where a vehicle travels most on a day-to-day basis.

"Yes, so you would be able to see on a map kind of which camera someone's going by most frequently," Stephenson said.


Posted by BrodyDad
Member since Dec 2025
427 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 4:01 pm to
quote:

Except flock creates a heat map of every vehicle in the system, tracking where every car goes. This has been admitted by flock. How can you say it's not individualized when Flock admits they do it?


Im not saying it would be an interesting case. What Im saying is it is external surveillance on everyone passing a point as opposed to a GPS placed on a car. You could accomplish the same by posting live officers there. I believe it is distinguishable. SCOTUS could prove me wrong, but they would have to take up the case....dont believe precedent is clear enough here.
Posted by 3nOut
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Jan 2013
32852 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 4:05 pm to
quote:

There seems to be little control around who can access what amounts to a database that tracks everyone’s movement, why they access it, and what they use the data for…


quote:

Some companies definitely sell the data, it’s purchased by insurance companies for investigations


My son got side swiped by an 18 wheeler 2 years ago.

When the insurance sent the report over they showed every ding and imperfection on the rest of his truck from cameras with dates for the year before claiming they weren’t covering that. Dozens of pictures from all over town.

I’m fine with them not covering, but it also told me how much data they had the ability to collect without our permission or knowledge.

It also showed me what could be used against me in something less innocuous.
This post was edited on 8/11/26 at 4:08 pm
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
92169 posts
Posted on 8/11/26 at 4:07 pm to
All of you carry a device that spies on you.



Every single one of you.
Jump to page
Page First 4 5 6 7 8 ... 11
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 11Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram