- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Its just a License Plate Reader
Posted on 8/11/26 at 1:28 pm to fightin tigers
Posted on 8/11/26 at 1:28 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
Yes. That is their stance.
Flock sells the cameras, maintains the records, maintains access, sells the service.
Then claims they own nothing.
Right. So can you point me to any reliable evidence or documentation that they are selling info gathered from the cameras?
Posted on 8/11/26 at 1:29 pm to BrodyDad
quote:
Right. So can you point me to any reliable evidence or documentation that they are selling info gathered from the cameras?
Not all LPRs are flock. Some companies definitely sell the data, it’s purchased by insurance companies for investigations.
Posted on 8/11/26 at 1:34 pm to Dawgfanman
quote:
Not all LPRs are flock. Some companies definitely sell the data, it’s purchased by insurance companies for investigations.
Once again, not what my cursory glance is showing. Can you point me toward documented evidence that this is happening?
Posted on 8/11/26 at 1:47 pm to Dawgfanman
quote:
LINK
Looks like they sell equipment directly to companies so it is not data that is coming from government sources. Kinda creepy, but still you have zero expectation of privacy in a public setting.
Posted on 8/11/26 at 1:55 pm to BrodyDad
quote:
Looks like they sell equipment directly to companies so it is not data that is coming from government sources. Kinda creepy, but still you have zero expectation of privacy in a public setting.
Their business is selling data. The users are govt, insurance, banks, and various investigators. It’s creepy and I didnt say people have an expectation of privacy. I don’t think most people know about such companies and the amount of data about them that is available to LEO and non LEO agencies.
Posted on 8/11/26 at 1:57 pm to BrodyDad
quote:
You have zero expectation of privacy in public.
The supreme court disagrees with this statement. (Specifically Jones, and then reaffirmed by Chatrie bar warrantless tracking on a dragnet scale).
quote:
someone can give me an actual clear and present danger, I am open to changing my opinion.
For the moment let's ignore the constitution, and stalking concerns (which seem to prevalent near everywhere they have been installed...), how many innocent people getting held up at police gunpoint over erroneous flock reads, seems dangerous to the average citizen?
There was even one instance last week where a woman was pulled over in one jurisdiction, weapons drawn at her and her family over an erroneous flock entry, and because the municipality forgot to take it down, it happened again in the neighboring jurisdiction. She's essentially been banished from travelling anywhere because of some lazy flock entry.
This post was edited on 8/11/26 at 2:00 pm
Posted on 8/11/26 at 2:01 pm to BrodyDad
Pornhub stores, markets, and made money off videos uploaded to their servers.
They were found guilty of sex trafficking because if videos they claimed they didn't own.
They were found guilty of sex trafficking because if videos they claimed they didn't own.
Posted on 8/11/26 at 2:02 pm to LemmyLives
Not true. But keep repeating the lie until it becomes the truth.
Posted on 8/11/26 at 2:05 pm to Willie Stroker
You make too much sense. You'll be mocked
Posted on 8/11/26 at 2:05 pm to done dancing
Any and every flock camera is an example of a private company marketing, controlling, storing, and selling the video system for a profit.
Posted on 8/11/26 at 2:11 pm to Willie Stroker
quote:
This is mostly the reason the public is able to participate in conversations about the balance of utilization and privacy. They valued privacy and public discussion of the boundaries.
I mean I can think of three instances off the top of my head that they flat out lie to their consumers. 1)"you own the data" except their Terms and Conditions explicitly say they have an irrevocable license to use said data, indefinitely on collection. 2)"we have never been hacked" there's a hilarious video online of a flock rep under oath in the Virginia legislature trying to claim this, while then (under questioning) admitting multiple people have gained access illicitly to their video feeds, live, with audible laughs of hilarity in the background. 3)"We just take pictures of license plates" except the image stores a searchable database of every person in the car, searchable by clothing, skin color, symbols, bumper stickers, marks, scratches etc.
In fact you don't need need a car or license plate to search it- for anyone curious, Google "Flock Freeform", it's even on their website.
quote:
Search With Natural Language
Type what you’re looking for, such as “man in blue shirt and cowboy hat” or “dark SUV with rear bumper damage.” Then review relevant visual matches across enabled video feeds, with vehicle results also available from LPR systems.
?
?
Video and LPR, All in One Place
Review person-related video search results from enabled video feeds alongside vehicle results from video and LPR systems in one interface.
Search Beyond Your Own Cameras
When authorized and where sharing is enabled, search shared camera footage from participating agencies, campuses, businesses, or neighboring properties to help identify leads across approved partner networks.
Flocks website- Flock Freeform
This post was edited on 8/11/26 at 2:17 pm
Popular
Back to top

2




