Started By
Message

re: Is Pluto really a planet?

Posted on 6/15/25 at 8:43 pm to
Posted by Armymann50
Playing with my
Member since Sep 2011
21773 posts
Posted on 6/15/25 at 8:43 pm to
9th planet as taught to me in school
Posted by DavidTheGnome
Monroe
Member since Apr 2015
31210 posts
Posted on 6/15/25 at 9:00 pm to
No. But it’s just an arbitrary distinction anyways
Posted by MikeBRLA
Baton Rouge
Member since Jun 2005
17116 posts
Posted on 6/15/25 at 9:02 pm to
quote:

My very educated mother just served us nachos


There. Now it makes sense without Pluto.
Posted by MemphisGuy
Germantown, TN
Member since Nov 2023
13455 posts
Posted on 6/15/25 at 9:12 pm to
quote:

Is Pluto really a planet?
Posted by cssamerican
Member since Mar 2011
7909 posts
Posted on 6/15/25 at 10:26 pm to
quote:

It does not clear the debris of its orbit. Therefore, it is a dwarf planet or minor planet.

So, is the idea that it’s just not a planet yet? Kinda like a planet in training?
Posted by Napoleon
Kenna
Member since Dec 2007
73095 posts
Posted on 6/15/25 at 10:34 pm to
My very educated mother just served us nachos is the new version.
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
52879 posts
Posted on 6/15/25 at 10:59 pm to
quote:

The classification of the nature of a planet does not remove it from being a planet.


Then the solar system has more than 13 planets.
This post was edited on 6/15/25 at 11:04 pm
Posted by fallguy_1978
Best States #50
Member since Feb 2018
52889 posts
Posted on 6/15/25 at 11:01 pm to
It's real to me dammit. It was my entire upbringing
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
52879 posts
Posted on 6/15/25 at 11:02 pm to
quote:

So, is the idea that it’s just not a planet yet? Kinda like a planet in training?


Not quite. It isn’t in the process of evolving.

An example of what they are talking about is the fact that’s its moon is nearly as big as Pluto. Even earth, which has an unusually large moon, is significantly more massive than the moon. And that’s not the only element. It’s more likely to having been a rogue moon of Neptune than a object that formed.
This post was edited on 6/15/25 at 11:02 pm
Posted by wesfau
Member since Mar 2023
1782 posts
Posted on 6/16/25 at 8:06 am to
Posted by Lonnie Utah
Utah!
Member since Jul 2012
31814 posts
Posted on 6/16/25 at 8:12 am to
The problem isn't pluto. The problem is Eris...

Posted by rattlebucket
SELA
Member since Feb 2009
12530 posts
Posted on 6/16/25 at 8:15 am to
His mama called him a planet imma call him a planet
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
37662 posts
Posted on 6/16/25 at 8:31 am to
quote:

My very educated mother just served us nachos

quote:

There. Now it makes sense without Pluto.


That’s gay as frick.
This post was edited on 6/16/25 at 8:31 am
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
215974 posts
Posted on 6/16/25 at 9:23 am to
It is. That where I came from. Not sure why I left though. The woman were super fine. Just a little cold.
Posted by eddieray
Lafayette
Member since Mar 2006
18984 posts
Posted on 6/16/25 at 12:01 pm to
quote:

The problem isn't whether Pluto is a planet. The problem is that if it is a planet, we have dozens of similar objects in the Kyper Belt


Yep if we let one be a planet, they’re all gonna want to be planets. And who’s got time to memorize all that.
Posted by BarberitosDawg
Lee County Florida across causeway
Member since Oct 2013
13108 posts
Posted on 6/16/25 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

Good question! The answer depends on how you define “planet.” Historically: Pluto was considered the ninth planet in the Solar System after its discovery in 1930. Currently (according to the IAU): In 2006, the International Astronomical Union (IAU) redefined what qualifies as a planet. Under their definition, a planet must: 1. Orbit the Sun, 2. Be spherical (due to its own gravity), 3. Have “cleared the neighborhood” around its orbit (meaning it’s gravitationally dominant in its orbit). Pluto meets the first two, but not the third—its orbit overlaps with other objects in the Kuiper Belt. So the IAU reclassified Pluto as a “dwarf planet.” Other views: • Some astronomers disagree with the IAU definition and still call Pluto a planet. • In 2017, NASA scientists proposed a different definition that would include Pluto as a planet again. So: ? Officially by IAU: Dwarf planet ? Debated by others: Could be called a planet depending on the definition you prefer.


ChatGPT response.
Posted by Dixie2023
Member since Mar 2023
4569 posts
Posted on 6/16/25 at 4:21 pm to
Yes.
Posted by LSUtiger89
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
4498 posts
Posted on 6/16/25 at 4:27 pm to
quote:

No, Pluto does not meet the current definition of a planet.


quote:

Therefore, it is classified as a dwarf planet.


You can’t say it’s not a planet then call it a planet. I’m sorry that doesn’t work.

That’s like saying “no it’s a dwarf is not a person. It’s just a dwarf person.”
Posted by BarberitosDawg
Lee County Florida across causeway
Member since Oct 2013
13108 posts
Posted on 6/16/25 at 4:29 pm to
Yea, it’s bizarre that’s why I made the post and it’s bizzaro coming from PhD folk acting like children!
Posted by East Coast Band
Member since Nov 2010
66890 posts
Posted on 6/16/25 at 4:35 pm to
quote:

No. It’s completely off of the galactic plane all real planets orbit.

Maybe Pluto is the only one on the galactic plane of planetary orbit and the other 8 are not.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram