
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Is assimilation into majority same as conquering?
Posted on 10/12/26 at 3:07 pm
Posted on 10/12/26 at 3:07 pm
Saw a video showing England most common name go from David to Muhammad. Assuming legal immigration, did they get conquered or is it just a new era of England?
Same for America, is Jamal a conqueror or just new era same as Industrial Revolution
Same for America, is Jamal a conqueror or just new era same as Industrial Revolution
Posted on 10/12/26 at 3:09 pm to fareplay
It will be England in name only. But eventually they will change the name as well.
Posted on 10/12/26 at 3:11 pm to fareplay
Watching an empire give away their empire, including the homeland, over the last half century is fascinating. It’s never happened in the history of man
Posted on 10/12/26 at 3:11 pm to fareplay
I feel like conquering is an intentional act, where assimilation by becoming the majority seems like absorption.
Outcome is the same, but the words feel less scary and that’s all that matters.
Outcome is the same, but the words feel less scary and that’s all that matters.
Posted on 10/12/26 at 3:12 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
This happens all the time right? They realize no victory and accept a slow defeat
Posted on 10/12/26 at 3:13 pm to fareplay
quote:
This happens all the time right?
Does it?
Posted on 10/12/26 at 3:13 pm to fareplay
I don't know. Did Europeons assimilate into North America, or conquer it? Did Pajeeet assimilate into the IT field, or did India conquer it? I guess it depends on if you're the conquerer or conquered.
Posted on 10/12/26 at 3:23 pm to UptownJoeBrown
quote:
But eventually they will change the name as well.
eng-Al-Andalusia
Posted on 10/12/26 at 3:31 pm to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
conquering is an intentional act, where assimilation by becoming the majority seems like absorption.
Assimilation is Afghans moving to Liverpool, starting to eat bacon within a generation, speaking Scouse, and be willing to glass someone over an argument on who is hated more, MCI or MU.
Conquering is blasting the call to prayer wherever you want. Which is the UK.
Posted on 10/12/26 at 3:39 pm to LemmyLives
Pretty sure the name will change to Englastan before my life is over
Posted on 10/12/26 at 3:47 pm to fr33manator
Londonistan has been the moniker for a while now....
Posted on 10/12/26 at 3:49 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:
Watching an empire give away their empire, including the homeland, over the last half century is fascinating. It’s never happened in the history of man
This just underscores the importance of proper dental hygiene.
Posted on 10/12/26 at 3:52 pm to fareplay
They needed ICE about 50 years ago.
Posted on 10/12/26 at 3:55 pm to Keith13
quote:
Pretty sure the name will change to Englastan before my life is over
I'm curious who falls first, England or France
Posted on 10/12/26 at 4:12 pm to fareplay
quote:
Is assimilation into majority same as conquering?
fareplay
No, conquering would be taking over and imposing your way of life
Assimilating would be adopting the way of life of your new locale. If the minority comes and maintains their laws and practices in opposition to the established culture and system that already exists, they are not assimiliating
Posted on 10/12/26 at 4:17 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
The consequences of oligarchy, which is arguably the inevitable result of democracy. A ruling class willing to loot and degrade their nation for personal wealth and the acquisition and preservation of power.
This post was edited on 10/12/26 at 4:25 pm
Posted on 10/13/26 at 11:45 am to ThePoo
quote:
Is assimilation into majority same as conquering?
fareplay
William the Conquerer was obviously a known for conquering England. But it was the way his men assimilated into their new home that made them such a success. They joined the religion of their new land, built gorgeous stone churches and castles and married local women. They were very successful.
However they were clever and adaptive. That not something muslims have ever been.
Posted on 10/13/26 at 11:48 am to fareplay
10% of all Muslims are named Mohammed or some variation. No other religion or culture matches that.
Posted on 10/13/26 at 11:52 am to Deadmanshand
quote:
10% of all Muslims are named Mohammed or some variation. No other religion or culture matches that.

Posted on 10/13/26 at 12:52 pm to Mingo Was His NameO
And they will get control over 120 functioning nuclear weapons too. 225 total but about 125 currently functional based on an online search.
Will be interesting to see how the US handles that dynamic.
Will be interesting to see how the US handles that dynamic.

Popular
Back to top

8










