Started By
Message

Is assimilation into majority same as conquering?

Posted on 10/12/26 at 3:07 pm
Posted by fareplay
Member since Nov 2012
6690 posts
Posted on 10/12/26 at 3:07 pm
Saw a video showing England most common name go from David to Muhammad. Assuming legal immigration, did they get conquered or is it just a new era of England?

Same for America, is Jamal a conqueror or just new era same as Industrial Revolution
Posted by UptownJoeBrown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2024
13185 posts
Posted on 10/12/26 at 3:09 pm to
It will be England in name only. But eventually they will change the name as well.
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
38256 posts
Posted on 10/12/26 at 3:11 pm to
Watching an empire give away their empire, including the homeland, over the last half century is fascinating. It’s never happened in the history of man
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
43231 posts
Posted on 10/12/26 at 3:11 pm to
I feel like conquering is an intentional act, where assimilation by becoming the majority seems like absorption.

Outcome is the same, but the words feel less scary and that’s all that matters.
Posted by fareplay
Member since Nov 2012
6690 posts
Posted on 10/12/26 at 3:12 pm to
This happens all the time right? They realize no victory and accept a slow defeat
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
43231 posts
Posted on 10/12/26 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

This happens all the time right?


Does it?
Posted by MSMHater
Houston
Member since Oct 2008
23509 posts
Posted on 10/12/26 at 3:13 pm to
I don't know. Did Europeons assimilate into North America, or conquer it? Did Pajeeet assimilate into the IT field, or did India conquer it? I guess it depends on if you're the conquerer or conquered.
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
135321 posts
Posted on 10/12/26 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

But eventually they will change the name as well.


eng-Al-Andalusia
Posted by LemmyLives
Texas
Member since Mar 2019
18050 posts
Posted on 10/12/26 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

conquering is an intentional act, where assimilation by becoming the majority seems like absorption.

Assimilation is Afghans moving to Liverpool, starting to eat bacon within a generation, speaking Scouse, and be willing to glass someone over an argument on who is hated more, MCI or MU.

Conquering is blasting the call to prayer wherever you want. Which is the UK.
Posted by Keith13
Member since Apr 2024
640 posts
Posted on 10/12/26 at 3:39 pm to
Pretty sure the name will change to Englastan before my life is over
Posted by medium_okra
City of Central
Member since Oct 2019
633 posts
Posted on 10/12/26 at 3:47 pm to
Londonistan has been the moniker for a while now....
Posted by LSUtoBOOT
Member since Aug 2012
21733 posts
Posted on 10/12/26 at 3:49 pm to
quote:

Watching an empire give away their empire, including the homeland, over the last half century is fascinating. It’s never happened in the history of man

This just underscores the importance of proper dental hygiene.
Posted by F1y0n7h3W4LL
Below I-10
Member since Jul 2019
4718 posts
Posted on 10/12/26 at 3:52 pm to
They needed ICE about 50 years ago.
Posted by Stealth Matrix
29°59'55.98"N 90°05'21.85"W
Member since Aug 2019
12155 posts
Posted on 10/12/26 at 3:55 pm to
quote:

Pretty sure the name will change to Englastan before my life is over

I'm curious who falls first, England or France
Posted by ThePoo
Work
Member since Jan 2007
62078 posts
Posted on 10/12/26 at 4:12 pm to
quote:

Is assimilation into majority same as conquering?
fareplay


No, conquering would be taking over and imposing your way of life

Assimilating would be adopting the way of life of your new locale. If the minority comes and maintains their laws and practices in opposition to the established culture and system that already exists, they are not assimiliating
Posted by Nobelium
Member since May 2018
876 posts
Posted on 10/12/26 at 4:17 pm to
The consequences of oligarchy, which is arguably the inevitable result of democracy. A ruling class willing to loot and degrade their nation for personal wealth and the acquisition and preservation of power.
This post was edited on 10/12/26 at 4:25 pm
Posted by RollinontheRiver
Member since Nov 2025
13 posts
Posted on 10/13/26 at 11:45 am to
quote:

Is assimilation into majority same as conquering?
fareplay


William the Conquerer was obviously a known for conquering England. But it was the way his men assimilated into their new home that made them such a success. They joined the religion of their new land, built gorgeous stone churches and castles and married local women. They were very successful.

However they were clever and adaptive. That not something muslims have ever been.


Posted by Deadmanshand
Member since Jun 2026
497 posts
Posted on 10/13/26 at 11:48 am to
10% of all Muslims are named Mohammed or some variation. No other religion or culture matches that.
Posted by CatfishJohn
Member since Jun 2020
23317 posts
Posted on 10/13/26 at 11:52 am to
quote:

10% of all Muslims are named Mohammed or some variation. No other religion or culture matches that.





Posted by tigers win2
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2009
3929 posts
Posted on 10/13/26 at 12:52 pm to
And they will get control over 120 functioning nuclear weapons too. 225 total but about 125 currently functional based on an online search.

Will be interesting to see how the US handles that dynamic.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram