- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/24/23 at 4:55 pm to KosmoCramer
I for one would not be surprised if he is convicted just because the jury knows he is going away for the rest of his life, so what does it hurt to convict and give everyone a sense of closure, even if he actually didnt do it?
Posted on 2/24/23 at 5:00 pm to SPEEDY
Did the investigators reenact if: from inside or outside of the house, the caliber of guns used could be heard from the kennels?


Posted on 2/24/23 at 5:09 pm to WhereIsMyBestLife
They need to bring an addict of any kind up to testify. When the prosecution was asking about how much he was taking daily( pills/ opioids).. He would go around the question and explain what pills he was taking. Every addict, using and in recovery can tell you the exact amount of whatever their vice is/was that it takes to get outta bed, the exact time and moment they would hit it up again, and so on throughout the day. I don’t believe he was a addict, another lie!
Posted on 2/24/23 at 5:11 pm to WhereIsMyBestLife
So he’s being tried for financial issues as well? I was thinking murder only. I hate to ask that but really haven’t followed until earlier this week.
This post was edited on 2/24/23 at 5:13 pm
Posted on 2/24/23 at 5:12 pm to tiger91
Yes, he's got 90 counts against him for financial crimes.
Posted on 2/24/23 at 5:14 pm to shallowminded
Lies, lies, and more lies.
Two more glaring lies from his first story to the cops is that when he woke up from his nap “I thought I heard a car pull up to the house.” Also as he was walking to his car to drive to his mom’s he says “we have a cat that lives near the house and I heard some rustling in the woods but I’m not sure if it was the cat.”
He nonchalantly planted these details (lies) early on to try and convince the cops that someone had pulled up to the house and was running through the woods, indicating that he might’ve heard the killer.
All the while, this was bullshite as he was down at the kennels during this time.
Two more glaring lies from his first story to the cops is that when he woke up from his nap “I thought I heard a car pull up to the house.” Also as he was walking to his car to drive to his mom’s he says “we have a cat that lives near the house and I heard some rustling in the woods but I’m not sure if it was the cat.”
He nonchalantly planted these details (lies) early on to try and convince the cops that someone had pulled up to the house and was running through the woods, indicating that he might’ve heard the killer.
All the while, this was bullshite as he was down at the kennels during this time.
This post was edited on 2/24/23 at 5:16 pm
Posted on 2/24/23 at 5:17 pm to CajunInFL
The whole thing is so insane. The guy is capable of anything. He stole insane amounts of money from people who needed it most. I mean one person was a quadriplegic. No doubt in my mind he’s capable of killing his own family. Give his arse the gas.
Posted on 2/24/23 at 5:18 pm to Stidham8
I think there is a very strong possibility that he’s found not guilty for the murders.
I think they definitely get him on the financial crimes and that’s where the good ol boys network will make it interesting
I think they definitely get him on the financial crimes and that’s where the good ol boys network will make it interesting
Posted on 2/24/23 at 5:31 pm to clownbaby
Back to the insurance on AM's life. Was the existence of such insurance ever entered into evidence? To whom was it payable? When was it bought and by whom?
Did the partnership have insurance on all the principles? Did it continue past his termination there?
Did the partnership have insurance on all the principles? Did it continue past his termination there?
Posted on 2/24/23 at 5:33 pm to real turf fan
Speaking of insurance he talked about calling someone about using insurance for his eye surgery.
Not sure if the insurance was through the law firm or not. I’m not well versed in that whole timeline
Not sure if the insurance was through the law firm or not. I’m not well versed in that whole timeline
Posted on 2/24/23 at 5:39 pm to clownbaby
quote:
I think there is a very strong possibility that he’s found not guilty for the murders. I think they definitely get him on the financial crimes and that’s where the good ol boys network will make it interesting
All it takes is one idiot for him not to be convicted. It wouldn’t be shocking.
This post was edited on 2/24/23 at 5:41 pm
Posted on 2/24/23 at 5:40 pm to Stidham8
Yeah I’m not really going out on a limb with that one lol
Posted on 2/24/23 at 5:42 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
Did the investigators reenact if: from inside or outside of the house, the caliber of guns used could be heard from the kennels?
Defense had an expert witness that testified that you wouldn’t be able to hear the shots fired at the kennels from inside the house.
Posted on 2/24/23 at 5:48 pm to shallowminded
quote:
don’t believe he was a addict, another lie!
No way he was using $50,000 a week in oxycodone. He would overdose the first day I don't care what his tolerance was. Plus being overweight already effected his breathing and blood pressure.
Posted on 2/24/23 at 5:53 pm to tiger91
The judge ruled the financial crimes were relevant. This timeline was admitted into testimony in the court, before AM admitted he was at the kennels.
quote:
Prosecution presents 88-page timeline tracking movements the night of the murders
Paul got to the main house at 8:14 p.m. Maggie was already there. Paul and Maggie’s phones show they were at the house from about 8:14 p.m. to 8:32 p.m., and their phones were locked for a lot of that time.
That might indicate the time they were eating dinner with Alex. Then, Paul starts to move toward the dog kennels, where he arrives at 8:42 p.m.
Paul takes a video to send to his friend Rogan Gibson.
In that video, witnesses have testified you can hear three voices: Paul, Maggie and Alex. That video is taken at 8:44 p.m.
The prosecution says that’s important because in an interview with the defendant two months after the killings, Alex Murdaugh tells investigators that he wasn’t at the kennels around 9 p.m.
"You didn’t go back down there after dinner until you returned from visiting your mother?" the investigator asks.
"Yes sir," Murdaugh responds.
Instead, Alex tells the investigators he took a nap right after dinner and did not go down to the dog kennels where Maggie and Paul’s bodies were found. When they asked about the video with three voices, Murdaugh said it wasn’t him.
"Who do you think it could have been?" the investigator questions.
"I have no idea," Murdaugh answers.
Shortly after recording the video, Paul unlocks his phone for the last time at 8:48 p.m. Maggie unlocks hers for the last time at 8:49 p.m. Then, both stay locked until they’re found by investigators after the murders.
At 8:53 p.m., Maggie’s phone changes orientation like from landscape to portrait multiple times over two minutes, but it isn’t unlocked.
It’s in this time frame the prosecution says the killings took place.
After almost an hour of no activity, Alex’s phone starts showing movement. It indicates 283 steps traveled between 9:02 and 9:06 p.m. He calls Maggie multiple times and sends her a text.
Then, at 9:07 p.m., his car shows that he leaves Moselle and heads to Almeda, where his mother lives.
At 9:08 p.m., Maggie’s phone data shows it’s on the side of the road away from the Moselle property, where it was later found by investigators.
South Carolina Law Enforcement Division Agent Peter Rudolfski testifies Murdaugh’s car slowly drove by that stretch of road where the phone was found on the night of the killings, going down to 42 miles per hour.
Rudolfski says after Murdaugh passed that location, his car began increasing speed, eventually hitting 80 mph.
Alex calls different people while driving to Almeda and arrives at 9:22 p.m. He stays for about 20 minutes, leaving at 9:43 p.m.
Related Articles
Testimony reveals suicide for hire plot; crime scene specialist reconstructs murder scene in Alex Murdaugh trial
Maggie Murdaugh's sister, Marian Proctor, testifies in Alex Murdaugh's murder trial
On his way home, Alex texts Maggie and Paul. He arrives at Moselle at 10 p.m. He calls Maggie again at 10:03 p.m. when he arrives at the main house.
Then, at 10:05 p.m., he heads to the dog kennels. At 10:06 p.m., he calls 9-1-1. According to the car data, there’s about 20 seconds between pulling up to the kennels and dialing 9-1-1, although Murdaugh says he checked both Maggie and Paul for a pulse in the 9-1-1 call.
Then he heads up to the main house and back down to the kennels as he tells the dispatcher he’s getting a gun.
The 9-1-1 call ends at 10:17 p.. Immediately after, he calls different friends and family. The first deputy arrives on scene at 10:25 p.m.
All of this data was combined from the evidence presented over nearly four weeks of witness testimony.
This post was edited on 2/24/23 at 5:58 pm
Posted on 2/24/23 at 6:14 pm to tiger91
quote:Why would AM go 80 miles an hour down a pot holed dirt road, when going 42 where Maggie's phone was found by LE?
South Carolina Law Enforcement Division Agent Peter Rudolfski testifies Murdaugh’s car slowly drove by that stretch of road where the phone was found on the night of the killings, going down to 42 miles per hour.
Rudolfski says after Murdaugh passed that location, his car began increasing speed, eventually hitting 80 mph.
Alex calls different people while driving to Almeda and arrives at 9:22 p.m. He stays for about 20 minutes, leaving at 9:43 p.m.
Posted on 2/24/23 at 6:40 pm to cajunangelle
Look it’s obvious he did it or had it done. He is a total POS anyway and will never see freedom again.
But I have trouble with the money he took, nothing I have seen seems to suggest he was spending 2 million a year or so on opioids, I am not even sure that’s possible. My wife seems to think his lifestyle was that and she can definitely spend a million or two a year buy to me it seems like a bunch of money is missing. Then there is that private plane at the hunting camp.
Does anyone else think a bunch of money is missing?
But I have trouble with the money he took, nothing I have seen seems to suggest he was spending 2 million a year or so on opioids, I am not even sure that’s possible. My wife seems to think his lifestyle was that and she can definitely spend a million or two a year buy to me it seems like a bunch of money is missing. Then there is that private plane at the hunting camp.
Does anyone else think a bunch of money is missing?
Posted on 2/24/23 at 6:47 pm to TutHillTiger
The hunting home was sold. There was an online listing that it was under contract. LINK
Did AM's law firm put liens on his belongings? Do they get this money from this sale? What about the beach property?

Did AM's law firm put liens on his belongings? Do they get this money from this sale? What about the beach property?




This post was edited on 2/24/23 at 6:51 pm
Posted on 2/24/23 at 7:18 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
Did AM's law firm put liens on his belongings? Do they get this money from this sale? What about the beach property?
Receivers have been appointed to control all of his assets. The proceeds will go towards the civil suits once that is all settled.
Popular
Back to top
