Started By
Message

re: I wonder if Alec Baldwin's gun was loaded by a malicious union crew striker

Posted on 10/26/21 at 7:06 am to
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
77528 posts
Posted on 10/26/21 at 7:06 am to
quote:


On the other hand, I step back a bit, and understand that an actor being handed a prop on a movie set, does NOT expect that prop to be an actual loaded weapon; does not think that's anywhere near the realm of possibility
Quit making sense. My fellow "conservatives" have to lash out like the Left these days.
Posted by mmmmmbeeer
ATL
Member since Nov 2014
9596 posts
Posted on 10/26/21 at 7:06 am to
quote:

Why in the hell would there be ‘target practice’ on a movie set with ammo for ANY reason? That’s totally insane!


They're working long days in the desert with nothing to do....good way to kill some time. It wasn't "on set", they were out shooting guns from the armory during their downtime. Sounds like some idiot didn't clear their weapon before putting it back on set.
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
72733 posts
Posted on 10/26/21 at 7:10 am to
quote:

They're working long days in the desert with nothing to do....good way to kill some time. It wasn't "on set", they were out shooting guns from the armory during their downtime. Sounds like some idiot didn't clear their weapon before putting it back on set.


a good producer would’ve never let that happen on their set.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
77528 posts
Posted on 10/26/21 at 7:10 am to
quote:


They're working long days in the desert with nothing to do....good way to kill some time. It wasn't "on set", they were out shooting guns from the armory during their downtime. Sounds like some idiot didn't clear their weapon before putting it back on set
Surprise. Sounds like you're making g excuses. No way should anything like that go on, despite the idea there was "nothing to do."
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
293106 posts
Posted on 10/26/21 at 7:11 am to
quote:

Quit making sense. My fellow "conservatives" have to lash out like the Left these days.


You seem to be missing the point, just like progressives.

Baldwin was the man in charge, it was a shoddy operation. Its HIS responsibility.

Of course him being a huge star has no bearing on your beliefs.

This post was edited on 10/26/21 at 7:12 am
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
293106 posts
Posted on 10/26/21 at 7:12 am to
quote:

a good producer would’ve never let that happen on their set.


THousands of shitty ones never did.

You can't break protocols and escape blame.
Posted by Rougarou4lsu
New Orleans
Member since Oct 2003
3100 posts
Posted on 10/26/21 at 7:13 am to
Why assume malice when incompetence fits so well.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
293106 posts
Posted on 10/26/21 at 7:17 am to
quote:

Why assume malice when incompetence fits so well.


Yeah, this is more incompetence and negligence than malice.

I don't believe in any way Baldwin meant to kill her. He just took too many shortcuts.
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
77528 posts
Posted on 10/26/21 at 7:18 am to
quote:

Baldwin was the man in charge, it was a shoddy operation. Its HIS responsibility.

It might be his responsibility as a producer for hiring inexperience, I haven't denied that. But this idea that he is to check every gun he is handed as if he is out shooting alone on a range is not likely something any actor does on a movie set where people are hired specifically for that job.

quote:


Of course him being a huge star has no bearing on your beliefs
This would be funny if you knew me. I don't watch movies. I despise celebrity culture and the public's worship of vacuous, self-important clowns. Baldwin is at the top when it comes to useless and completely forgettable. A person who, ultimately, has contributed little to society and those around him.

But, I can remain objective.
Posted by CottonWasKing
4,8,15,16,23,42
Member since Jun 2011
29478 posts
Posted on 10/26/21 at 7:19 am to
quote:

On the other hand, I step back a bit, and understand that an actor being handed a prop on a movie set, does NOT expect that prop to be an actual loaded weapon; does not think that's anywhere near the realm of possibility.



I place zero blame on Alec Baldwin the actor.

I place a shite ton of blame on Alec Baldwin the executive producer.

After ONE negligent discharges he should’ve made sure that crew were replaced and appropriate safety protocols were followed.

After 4 negligent discharges, 1 injury and 1 dead everyone in power on that set is culpable.
Posted by Tiger Ryno
#WoF
Member since Feb 2007
107336 posts
Posted on 10/26/21 at 7:26 am to
If baldwin was performing this scene with his own daughter do you think he would have personally inspected the gun before firing? Oh wait....
Posted by madmaxvol
Infinity + 1 Posts
Member since Oct 2011
21568 posts
Posted on 10/26/21 at 7:33 am to
quote:

Easy answer. Crew members were also using the guns with live rounds for "target practice". This is documented.



Why would they ever allow the same guns used for "target practice" to be taken onto the set? There should be a hardline separating any guns used with live rounds from coming onto a set where guns will also be used as props.
Posted by MattA
Member since Nov 2019
1981 posts
Posted on 10/26/21 at 7:34 am to
quote:

Why in the hell would there be ‘target practice’ on a movie set with ammo for ANY reason? That’s totally insane!



Well at least one of the gun prop people looked like a 16 year old girl. Always known to be reliable and on top of important, potentially dangerous, activities.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
293106 posts
Posted on 10/26/21 at 7:40 am to
quote:

every gun he is handed as if he is out shooting alone on a range is not likely something any actor does


You would be wrong, and have never taken a gun safety class.

After previous incidents, do you think it would have been prudent to check before aiming at someone? (Which is against protocol)
Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
77528 posts
Posted on 10/26/21 at 7:53 am to
It is a movie with people hired to handle this. Do you think even half the actors who handle guns in films check them themselves?

quote:


After previous incidents, do you think it would have been prudent to check before aiming at someone?
This is a good point. What was the nature of those misfires?
This post was edited on 10/26/21 at 7:55 am
Posted by Blutarsky
112th Congress
Member since Jan 2004
11726 posts
Posted on 10/26/21 at 7:57 am to
quote:

wonder if Alec Baldwin's gun was loaded by a malicious union crew striker


It shouldn’t matter.

The weapon should have been checked before being handed to Baldwin and rechecked again by Baldwin.

Since it’s a Western, it was probably an old revolver. Who doesn’t see a round in the next cylinder? Everyone?
Posted by meauxses
Member since Nov 2012
2891 posts
Posted on 10/26/21 at 7:59 am to
quote:

On the other hand, I step back a bit, and understand that an actor being handed a prop on a movie set, does NOT expect that prop to be an actual loaded weapon; does not think that's anywhere near the realm of possibility.


I have seen people just completely ignore this sentiment and don't really understand how.
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
Member since May 2012
58741 posts
Posted on 10/26/21 at 8:01 am to
quote:

Who doesn’t see a round in the next cylinder? Everyone?


there should be a round in the cylinder

just not a live one
This post was edited on 10/26/21 at 8:02 am
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
293106 posts
Posted on 10/26/21 at 8:03 am to
quote:


I have seen people just completely ignore this sentiment and don't really understand how.


Because there were previous issues of loaded guns fired on this very set, when they were supposed to be blanks.

It becomes a responsibility if youre having issues with improperly loaded firearms. Extra safety precautions should be taken.
Posted by teke184
Zachary, LA
Member since Jan 2007
103092 posts
Posted on 10/26/21 at 8:06 am to
Low rent production

Armorer who is incompetent at her job and lied in the interview by her own admission

Assistant Director with a history of unsafety with stunts and firearms who has gotten fired over it before.

And the set had at least two firing incidents before this which was the subject of the strike by much of the crew.


I hate Baldwin as a person but chalking it up to conspiracy for or against him when incompetence by everyone involved is likely horrible at their jobs is a bit much.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram