- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How many of you baws are overweight? (chart)
Posted on 8/10/18 at 7:53 am to celltech1981
Posted on 8/10/18 at 7:53 am to celltech1981
Who the hell is 6’2 and weighs 148? That dude needs to see a doctor stat
2
Posted on 8/10/18 at 7:54 am to htran90
If you’re 5’7” and 180lbs, you’re fat. I’m 5’10” and I weigh the same as you do, and I could stand to lose 10lbs.
Posted on 8/10/18 at 7:55 am to celltech1981
a 74" male that weighs 148 pounds is not normal unless you're in Mogadishu.
Posted on 8/10/18 at 7:55 am to Displaced
quote:
Worst movement to happen to men in the last 50 years.
Dad bods have ruled the world for generations.
No kid in skinny jeans and a beanie in July will ever be shite. That movement was way worse.
Posted on 8/10/18 at 7:56 am to MSTiger33
quote:
Who the hell is 6’2 and weighs 148? That dude needs to see a doctor stat
Guys in the NFL that are 6'2 come in at 200-210 and those guys are absolutely shredded and spend 100% of their time taking care of their body. The average man at 6'2 should probably be in about the 185 range so while, yes, that would be thin it is not outrageous.
Posted on 8/10/18 at 7:56 am to Displaced
quote:
I just bare the social responsibility to fight the fat acceptance movement.
You should put your clothes back on.
Posted on 8/10/18 at 7:57 am to GRTiger
quote:
No kid in skinny jeans and a beanie in July will ever be shite. That movement was way worse.
They're huge pussies no doubt, but at least they won't die at 52 from the beetus or a heart attack
Posted on 8/10/18 at 7:58 am to Mo Jeaux
At my heaviest I was 5-9 190 and I rationalized it by saying I carried a lot of muscle even though I hadn’t worked out consistently in a couple years. Looking back at pics from that era, I wasn’t outright fat but I was a certified chubster that was just plain out of shape even though I didn’t believe it at the time.
Now I’m 160-165 and I’m actually working out consistently and I think it’s the best weight for me.
Now I’m 160-165 and I’m actually working out consistently and I think it’s the best weight for me.
Posted on 8/10/18 at 7:58 am to Mingo Was His NameO
Cancer from mustache oils will get them.
Posted on 8/10/18 at 7:59 am to Mo Jeaux
I only wear clothes because I have to at work.
Posted on 8/10/18 at 7:59 am to Displaced
quote:No, this is shifting away from the notion that one should be able to visualize another's entire spinal column or wonder if those are muscles or rubber bands under the skin. Not everyone should look like a homeless alcoholic who smokes two packs per day.
This is a telling phrase. This goes back to the idea that "normal" is shifting towards fat.
Show us a pic of a guy 6' and 140-150 pounds.
This post was edited on 8/10/18 at 8:01 am
Posted on 8/10/18 at 7:59 am to lnomm34
Nah, don't listen to the haters. They'll be the same ones in their 40s and 50s having to wear button downs partially unbuttoned to accommodate their neck girth.
Posted on 8/10/18 at 7:59 am to celltech1981
Yeah I'm 6' 185. 34" waist. frick this gay arse chart.
Posted on 8/10/18 at 7:59 am to celltech1981
I’m 6’3 235. I was 270 six months ago I’ve been doing low carb. Not to bad for almost 52
Posted on 8/10/18 at 8:01 am to celltech1981
Graph isn't even organized well.
For a 5'11 guy, it says "normal" is 136-172 and "overweight" is 179-208.
So....uh, what happened to 173-178?
For a 5'11 guy, it says "normal" is 136-172 and "overweight" is 179-208.
So....uh, what happened to 173-178?
This post was edited on 8/10/18 at 8:03 am
Posted on 8/10/18 at 8:02 am to MSTiger33
148 at 6'2" is thin. I bet my manager is that size and he definitely is very thin. Will not be winning any weight lifting competitions.
But to say they need to see a doctor shows how used to fatties we've become. He's far from sick looking.
But to say they need to see a doctor shows how used to fatties we've become. He's far from sick looking.
Posted on 8/10/18 at 8:02 am to Displaced
quote:
This is a telling phrase. This goes back to the idea that "normal" is shifting towards fat.
Trust me, it would not be "fat". If I was working out and running every day for years and still weighted about 150, 160 is not overweight. It would be normal weight but according to that scale it falls between normal and overweight.
Posted on 8/10/18 at 8:02 am to Jake88
Nice edit. 6' 160 is not abnormal...
But again, you are picking the bottom of a 40 lb spectrum.
But just for fun, here is 2. Featherweight is 145. Austin Arnett is 6' tall.
But again, you are picking the bottom of a 40 lb spectrum.
But just for fun, here is 2. Featherweight is 145. Austin Arnett is 6' tall.
This post was edited on 8/10/18 at 8:07 am
Posted on 8/10/18 at 8:03 am to Jake88
quote:
No, this is shifting away from the notion that one should be able to visualize another's entire spinal column or wonder if those are muscles or rubber bands under the skin. Not everyone should look like a homeless alcoholic who smokes two packs per day.
If you actually believe this you are so out of touch with reality it's unbelievable. More likely, though, you are just fat and rationalizing your fatness despite not believing what is coming out of your own mouth.
Posted on 8/10/18 at 8:04 am to rowbear1922
quote:
Trust me, it would not be "fat". If I was working out and running every day for years and still weighted about 150, 160 is not overweight. It would be normal weight but according to that scale it falls between normal and overweight.
You can't outrun or put lift Big Macs and Canes bubba
Page 5 of 26
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News