- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How many of you baws are overweight? (chart)
Posted on 8/10/18 at 7:25 am to celltech1981
Posted on 8/10/18 at 7:25 am to celltech1981
I’m 6’5 but extrapolating the chart out based on how much it goes up, if I was fricking 160-190 I would be skin and bones, these charts are BS, they don’t account for normal sized or people who work out.
The overweight part at 210-240. I would be ripped at 210.
The overweight part at 210-240. I would be ripped at 210.
1
Posted on 8/10/18 at 7:27 am to LSU-MNCBABY
Post a shirtless pic of your chart-defying physique
Posted on 8/10/18 at 7:27 am to celltech1981
I'm 5'7 and 180 now. I was 160 and I just felt unhealthy and weak. Couldn't work out as hard. Tired all the time.
170 was my sweet spot. 180 is the where I can't go any higher or I start feeling worse.
My lipids, a1c, and basic labs are all good.
170 was my sweet spot. 180 is the where I can't go any higher or I start feeling worse.
My lipids, a1c, and basic labs are all good.
Posted on 8/10/18 at 7:28 am to celltech1981
according to that chart i need to lose another 13 lbs
Posted on 8/10/18 at 7:30 am to Displaced
Its not overweight but it's also not normal. Don't call it normal. It should be called "your arse needs to eat".
Posted on 8/10/18 at 7:31 am to Displaced
You seem to have a lot of personal feelings and emotions invested in this topic. Too many bears when you're looking for a twink?
Posted on 8/10/18 at 7:31 am to htran90
quote:
I'm 5'7 and 180 now. I was 160 and I just felt unhealthy and weak. Couldn't work out as hard. Tired all the time.
170 was my sweet spot. 180 is the where I can't go any higher or I start feeling worse.
My lipids, a1c, and basic labs are all good.
5'7" and 170 is pretty large.
Posted on 8/10/18 at 7:32 am to celltech1981
quote:
At 5'6"
quote:
is this chart for women?? gotta be for women.
Isn't that what you need, m'lady?
Posted on 8/10/18 at 7:33 am to Brazos
Why are you nitpicking the bottom of the chart???
If so many of these baws are "big framed", "broad shoulders", "brick shithouse", etc... and arguing to be considered normal, then why is the tall lanky frame not considered normal too?
If so many of these baws are "big framed", "broad shoulders", "brick shithouse", etc... and arguing to be considered normal, then why is the tall lanky frame not considered normal too?
Posted on 8/10/18 at 7:33 am to GetCocky11
quote:
5'7" and 170 is pretty large.
sonic on perkins baw
quote:
GRTiger
you too
This post was edited on 8/10/18 at 7:35 am
Posted on 8/10/18 at 7:35 am to celltech1981
quote:
quote:
5'7" and 170 is pretty large.
quote:
sonic on perkins baw
I mean, it is. If you workout and maintain a lot of muscle, then I get it. However, if you're 5'7" and 170 and don't get much exercise, then that is a large body.
Posted on 8/10/18 at 7:36 am to PowerTool
No, I just bare the social responsibility to fight the fat acceptance movement.
Your (hopefully less fat) children will thank me one day.
Your (hopefully less fat) children will thank me one day.
Posted on 8/10/18 at 7:38 am to celltech1981
My height isn't on there.
With that said, I'm about 25 pounds from being within my BMI and my ideal weight is probably 40 pounds away.
With that said, I'm about 25 pounds from being within my BMI and my ideal weight is probably 40 pounds away.
Posted on 8/10/18 at 7:41 am to celltech1981
I'm off the charts... Some magical world between normal and overweight
Posted on 8/10/18 at 7:42 am to celltech1981
I'm in the normal but still have a muffin top.
6', 172, 63 y/o. Suck it, fatties.
6', 172, 63 y/o. Suck it, fatties.
Posted on 8/10/18 at 7:47 am to NyCaLa
quote:
6', 172, 63 y/o. Suck it, fatties.
I got 3 inches, 50 lbs and 30 years on you. Watch it, old man.
I'm not fat. I'm craft beer dad bod chic, bitch.
Posted on 8/10/18 at 7:49 am to GRTiger
Are you 93?
Posted on 8/10/18 at 7:49 am to GRTiger
quote:
dad bod
Worst movement to happen to men in the last 50 years. Normalizing of being a schlub
This post was edited on 8/10/18 at 7:50 am
Posted on 8/10/18 at 7:50 am to KG6
Yes, but I don't look a day over 80.
Posted on 8/10/18 at 7:50 am to GetCocky11
quote:
I'm 5'7 and 180 now. I was 160 and I just felt unhealthy and weak. Couldn't work out as hard. Tired all the time.
Because you were burning fat. At 180 you are a certified fatass, at 160 you are still fat. At 5'7, you should be in the 140-150 range. But I have broad shoulders blah, blah, blah, no you are just a fat arse and we've conditioned moderately overweight to normal, fatass to fat, and deathly obese to fatass.
Page 4 of 26
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News