Started By
Message
locked post

How did the ancient Romans feel about the Roman Republic/Empire

Posted on 5/4/18 at 2:37 pm
Posted by BulldogXero
Member since Oct 2011
10379 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 2:37 pm
I think sometimes that it's impossible for us to envision a world where the United States didn't exist, but it has only existed for around 242 years. This is a pretty paltry amount of time compared to how long some of the empires of the ancient world existed.

In particular, Rome with all of its power and influence in antiquity it fascinates me how Roman citizens particularly when Rome was at the height of its power could fathom a world where Rome as a nation did not exist and wonder just how much of a world ending catastrophe it did seem like when the barbarians sacked the capital and pretty much ended Roman influence in all of western Europe.
Posted by TigerDeacon
West Monroe, LA
Member since Sep 2003
29900 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

In particular, Rome with all of its power and influence in antiquity it fascinates me how Roman citizens particularly when Rome was at the height of its power could fathom a world where Rome as a nation did not exist and wonder just how much of a world ending catastrophe it did seem like when the barbarians sacked the capital and pretty much ended Roman influence in all of western Europe.


Wasn't as simplistic as you describe.
Posted by Upperdecker
St. George, LA
Member since Nov 2014
33904 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

In particular, Rome with all of its power and influence in antiquity it fascinates me how Roman citizens particularly when Rome was at the height of its power could fathom a world where Rome as a nation did not exist and wonder just how much of a world ending catastrophe it did seem like when the barbarians sacked the capital and pretty much ended Roman influence in all of western Europe.

This is at least 4 sentences combined into one big string of nonsense
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
151053 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 2:39 pm to
and i thought i was high
Posted by OysterPoBoy
City of St. George
Member since Jul 2013
45546 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 2:40 pm to
I believe they spent most of their time taking baths with hot naked men. So I imagine they felt pretty good about it.
Posted by Brosef Stalin
Member since Dec 2011
42608 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 2:40 pm to
Rome was already on the decline when it fell
Posted by JetsetNuggs
Member since Jun 2014
15614 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 2:41 pm to
In a world where trillhoging and pillaging was a legitimate threat, I'd imagine it was pretty awesome for them until the end.

They fricked everyone up and owned most of the known world.
This post was edited on 5/4/18 at 2:42 pm
Posted by BestBanker
Member since Nov 2011
19724 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 2:42 pm to
They had long sticks with pointy things on the end
Posted by deathvalleyfreak43
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
14575 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 2:46 pm to
Just got done listening to the "History of Rome" podcast by Mike Duncan... great stuff if you haven't listened to it.

He does a great job of describing the day to day life of your average Roman throughout it's history. During Rome's height, your average Roman was not much different than you or I. They were concerned with their family and friends and had very little interest in the politics of Rome. The only time they would be pissed is if the monthly games were canceled or their monthly grain allotment was cut off. They were just people and the graffiti from the time backs that up.

Examples of Roman graffiti

quote:

“Celadus makes the girls moan.”
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
40807 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 2:48 pm to
The romans from fall of the republic era wouldn’t recognize the empire as it fell.

Posted by PhilemonThomas
Member since Jan 2015
2983 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 2:57 pm to
A few things.

By the time that Rome was sacked its power had been on the decline for quite a long time. And by that time One could argue that the power that was once centered in Rome transferred to the "East" at Constantinople.

As the Republic and later Empire expanded areas were "Romanized" to varying degrees. Some places identified with Rome more than others. While Rome may collect taxes and a Roman or Romanized elite would build buildings in a town many in the town might still cling to indigenous values and practices. Think Judea in the Bible.

The idea of a nation like the U.S. is modern. While the Imperial government collected taxes and provided a grain dole in Rome it had no where near the reach or affect on the lives of ordinary citizens as the U.S. gov't does today. Your average Roman knew very little about what was really going on outside of their town. They knew what the elite told them or whatever imperial propaganda was directed to them, or whatever the local cult priest told them.

Really the "Fall of the Roman Empire" is a theory. Some argue it never really fell it just turned into something else. Yes the city of Rome ceased to be the political and cultural center of the world but the people that felt the affect of that most were the people that actually lived in Rome and by the time that happened Rome's population was in decline.
Posted by real turf fan
East Tennessee
Member since Dec 2016
12217 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 2:59 pm to
I'm currently reading Mike Duncan's "The Storm before the Storm The Beginning of the End of the Roman Empire".

The first surprise was the detailed list of people involved 2000 years ago, all their names and their jobs and how long they could hold a job. Then comes the economy tied to those jobs....and what the masses expected as entertainment, even from those who had had jobs in non-lucrative destinations.

The situations were complex, and the movement of personalities within the government were also complex. ;

To answer the OP question, this book would give a feel for the sense of place at the time. Only a photographic memory could keep all the people straight (or even remembered in the next chapter.)

Lots of the political and military decision making is, at least, conceivable to me. Coming to the book remembering only the very basics, I've found this much more interesting that the history books had it in school (much less what littel Latin I and II mentioned.)
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
60155 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 3:00 pm to
The republic was weak and bloated and lots of people were on welfare and then Julius Caesar took over and made Rome great again
Posted by Ancient Astronaut
Member since May 2015
37409 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 3:06 pm to
What does Dan Carlin say? He is the history expert you heard me
Posted by lake chuck fan
Vinton
Member since Aug 2011
24920 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 3:08 pm to
That's an interesting question.
A leading factor in decline of Roman rule was not growing its Navy to keep pace with its conquest, impaired the ability to supply and control the area's being conquered.
The continuing decline of the government and citizenry could have been either the cause or effect...... ?
Posted by deathvalleyfreak43
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
14575 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

What does Dan Carlin say? He is the history expert you heard me


Dan Carlin in the GOAT but Mike Duncan is the resident expert on all things Rome
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
42762 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 3:22 pm to
One could also argue that the eroding of Roman Republican values, ignoring traditional Polical restraint/decorum in pursuit of power by elites, and the watering down of military requirements and in turn watering down the Roman army was the cause of the “fall” of Rome
Posted by TigerMeister
North shore
Member since Nov 2009
2454 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

In particular, Rome with all of its power and influence in antiquity it fascinates me how Roman citizens particularly when Rome was at the height of its power could fathom a world where Rome as a nation did not exist and wonder just how much of a world ending catastrophe it did seem like when the barbarians sacked the capital and pretty much ended Roman influence in all of western Europe.

Nailed it
Posted by TigerNlc
Chocolate City
Member since Jun 2006
33220 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 3:32 pm to
Cultcha was their downfall.
Posted by deathvalleyfreak43
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
14575 posts
Posted on 5/4/18 at 3:33 pm to
I believe that the rise in the Catholic church and the Bishop of Milan, Ambrose, had a great deal to do with the fall of Rome. Although the Roman empire was a shell of itself by the time Ambrose rose to power, he proved that the people in charge had no real power and challenged them at every turn with no real consequences. It also set the precedent for the power that the church as today. If he had not stood up to the weak Roman emperors of the time like he did with no consequence the church would not have as much power as it does today.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram