- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How did Hitler convince millions of people to commit genocide?
Posted on 7/19/15 at 4:41 am to vengeanceofrain
Posted on 7/19/15 at 4:41 am to vengeanceofrain
quote:
and that's why if they would have succeed with that, they would have came here next.
Not nearly enough leftover troops and resources to pull that shite off.
But yes revenge is why Hitler chose the Compiègne Wagon as the site where France would sign the June 22, 1940 Armistice. It was the site of Germany's biggest humiliation after World War 1.
Posted on 7/19/15 at 5:28 am to The Boat
How many countries in this liberal, internationally connected age of 2015 still want to wipe Israel off the face of the map? Over land.
The truth is, as usual, probably somewhere in between.
Did Hitler paint a false picture and exaggerate Jewish effect on society to manufacture anti-Semitic attitudes? Sure.
But Germany was in a war of survival and they believed the Jews were a threat to that. Throwing around the word scapegoat is PC bullshite. This notion that the Jews went from the most agreeable, go with the flow people in the world who were the pinnacle of co-existing with other nations to the biggest shite starters in the world for the last half century is absolutely ridiculous.
Jews are an incredibly smart and capable people. A bunch of Jews ended up being instrumental in creating the atomic bomb. Genocide is obviously tremendously horrible and we know its not the answer. But what you would have suggested? Your people's land is being taken away and you have a historically belligerent France, England trying to stop any threats to their old world dominance, as well as a re-arming Soviet Union with a dangerous, violence and conquering based ideology surrounding you. Add in the US involving itself in European affairs.
Jews and other threats to the Reich weren't killed for sadistic pleasure or revenge. And the Jews were very much a threat to Socialist Germany as well as the war effort. Holocaust was one of the horrors of civilized history but revisionist history on the circumstances stifles understanding of the human element of "how did Hitler convince..."
Easy for us to sit back and condemn the way a country dealt with a threat when we are bordered by the 2 biggest oceans in the world and 2 relatively prideless nations who have never had the slightest ambition to be a world power.
The truth is, as usual, probably somewhere in between.
Did Hitler paint a false picture and exaggerate Jewish effect on society to manufacture anti-Semitic attitudes? Sure.
But Germany was in a war of survival and they believed the Jews were a threat to that. Throwing around the word scapegoat is PC bullshite. This notion that the Jews went from the most agreeable, go with the flow people in the world who were the pinnacle of co-existing with other nations to the biggest shite starters in the world for the last half century is absolutely ridiculous.
Jews are an incredibly smart and capable people. A bunch of Jews ended up being instrumental in creating the atomic bomb. Genocide is obviously tremendously horrible and we know its not the answer. But what you would have suggested? Your people's land is being taken away and you have a historically belligerent France, England trying to stop any threats to their old world dominance, as well as a re-arming Soviet Union with a dangerous, violence and conquering based ideology surrounding you. Add in the US involving itself in European affairs.
Jews and other threats to the Reich weren't killed for sadistic pleasure or revenge. And the Jews were very much a threat to Socialist Germany as well as the war effort. Holocaust was one of the horrors of civilized history but revisionist history on the circumstances stifles understanding of the human element of "how did Hitler convince..."
Easy for us to sit back and condemn the way a country dealt with a threat when we are bordered by the 2 biggest oceans in the world and 2 relatively prideless nations who have never had the slightest ambition to be a world power.
Posted on 7/19/15 at 5:32 am to Mr. Hangover
quote:
Pretty much without scientists like Einstein and a few great leaders and some great soldiers in some big battles the allies were likely fricked
Oh so take out the 10 or so most important influences plus "great soldiers" for the Allies and replace them with clowns. Leave all Axis powers great leaders like Rommel in tact and the Allies were in trouble?
Imagine that.
Posted on 7/19/15 at 7:37 am to Tiger1242
Watch Triumph of the Will.
Posted on 7/19/15 at 8:17 am to TheSexecutioner
quote:
TheSexecutioner
You need to tread carefully, you're sounding pretty close to a Nazi sympathizer right now
This post was edited on 7/19/15 at 8:17 am
Posted on 7/19/15 at 8:19 am to Geauxld Finger
quote:
Pretty much without scientists like Einstein and a few great leaders and some great soldiers in some big battles the allies were likely fricked
I love when people say stuff like this
"Take Jordan off the 90's Bulls and they were fricked"
Posted on 7/19/15 at 8:41 am to Tiger1242
Hitler appealed to tribal instincts. Jews were not part of his tribe, and he demonized them. His tribe bought the message.
You can see it repeating itself today on both a large and small scale. Minority groups in the United States cluster together and take pride in their uniqueness, they emphasize their differences while demanding they not be treated differently despite the differences they celebrate. And of course the obvious are Muslims. They are part of a tribe that doesn't even bother to hide their intent to kill non-members of the tribe.
You can see it repeating itself today on both a large and small scale. Minority groups in the United States cluster together and take pride in their uniqueness, they emphasize their differences while demanding they not be treated differently despite the differences they celebrate. And of course the obvious are Muslims. They are part of a tribe that doesn't even bother to hide their intent to kill non-members of the tribe.
Posted on 7/19/15 at 8:54 am to Tiger1242
quote:
How did Hitler convince millions of people to commit genocide?
The same way Obama is convincing millions of people that white people are evil and deserve to die.
Posted on 7/19/15 at 9:07 am to mahdragonz
quote:
There is a really great documentary called blind spot that interviews hitlers secretary.
They turned that into a movie you might be familiar with. "Downfall". It's best known for the scene where Hitler finds out Steiner didn't have enough men for the pincer attack and curses Keitel, Burgdorf, Krebs, and Jodl.
Posted on 7/19/15 at 9:34 am to Tiger1242
quote:Because sheople are easily herded, whether it be 1940s Germany, or 2001 America.
How did Hitler convince millions of people to commit genocide?
Posted on 7/19/15 at 9:38 am to FreeWillie
quote:
The same way Obama is convincing millions of people that white people are evil and deserve to die.
For example?
Posted on 7/19/15 at 9:42 am to Tiger1242
He promised them free healthcare and cell phones.
Posted on 7/19/15 at 10:00 am to ManBearTiger
quote:
He promised them free healthcare and cell phones.
There are calls to redistribute wealth and take what belongs to someone else and give it to certain constituents. The Democratic Party is becoming the non-white party very quickly.....but the comparison to pre WW2 Germany is not quite valid.
Posted on 7/19/15 at 10:05 am to TX Tiger
quote:
2001 America.
quote:
LSUDUKE
The same way George Bush invaded Iraq and if anybody spoke up against it they were labeled a traitor? YOU'RE EITHER WITH US, OR YOU'RE AGAINST US!!
Are you two really trying to compare Bush going to war with Hitler? Really? Every president who went to war then can be compared to Hitler. Bush doesn't even come close to Hitler.
Hitler hated Jews because of things in his past speculation ranges from his ouster from art school, Jewish doctor not saving his mother, to a half Jewish father. But he hated them for some reason and saw them as a good starting point to get the German people on his side.
Germany was devastated after WWI and would believe any charismatic leader who promised them something better. They were a poor and broken people and he told them they were a superior race of humans who would rule the world for a 1000 years. once elected he gave them jobs, money, and a prosperous Country and a shinny bad guy in the dirty Jews. He had an awesome propaganda machine that sold everybody on it all. Once their lives were good and they bought into it, it wasn't hard to get them on board with crazier ideas or to turn a blind eye to atrocities.
Posted on 7/19/15 at 3:04 pm to The Boat
Yes by the time Stalingrad was over it was the beginning of the end for Germany. But had they somehow pulled that off, make no mistake they would have came here next.
Really, the war would have been a lot different if hilter didn't try to be the military commander. Part of what made Stalin so strong a leader is that he understood what he didn't understand and had good people around him. Stalin knew he wasn't a military commander and left the commanding to the commanders. Hitler didn't. The invasion of Russia, the entire strategy of the war on the German front was Hilter.
The war would have been much, much different had Hitler left Russia alone and concentrated on Europe. I think the allies would have still won.. eventually. But would have cost a lot more american lives and i think we would have used the bomb on Germany before we did in Hiroshima
Really, the war would have been a lot different if hilter didn't try to be the military commander. Part of what made Stalin so strong a leader is that he understood what he didn't understand and had good people around him. Stalin knew he wasn't a military commander and left the commanding to the commanders. Hitler didn't. The invasion of Russia, the entire strategy of the war on the German front was Hilter.
The war would have been much, much different had Hitler left Russia alone and concentrated on Europe. I think the allies would have still won.. eventually. But would have cost a lot more american lives and i think we would have used the bomb on Germany before we did in Hiroshima
Posted on 7/19/15 at 3:09 pm to Tiger1242
Germans had been humiliated after WWI in many different ways and the jews were Hitler's target for the blame. After he came into power he was able to have all kinds of propaganda made to brainwash the German people.
Read "Ordinary Men". It will take you into the minds of the people that were ordered to take out these orders. The vast majority of German soldiers didn't want to do it at first but then they became numb to it. It basically argues that the German people weren't some incredible monsters. That it could happen anywhere in this world if the right people come into power.
Read "Ordinary Men". It will take you into the minds of the people that were ordered to take out these orders. The vast majority of German soldiers didn't want to do it at first but then they became numb to it. It basically argues that the German people weren't some incredible monsters. That it could happen anywhere in this world if the right people come into power.
Posted on 7/19/15 at 3:14 pm to Tiger1242
Millions of people did not commit it, they just looked the other way. So your title is somewhat misleading. Change it or i will send and infestation of locust on you and yours.
j/k
no i will
j/k
no i will
Posted on 7/19/15 at 3:23 pm to TheSexecutioner
quote:
How many countries in this liberal, internationally connected age of 2015 still want to wipe Israel off the face of the map? Over land.
The truth is, as usual, probably somewhere in between.
Did Hitler paint a false picture and exaggerate Jewish effect on society to manufacture anti-Semitic attitudes? Sure.
But Germany was in a war of survival and they believed the Jews were a threat to that. Throwing around the word scapegoat is PC bullshite. This notion that the Jews went from the most agreeable, go with the flow people in the world who were the pinnacle of co-existing with other nations to the biggest shite starters in the world for the last half century is absolutely ridiculous.
Jews are an incredibly smart and capable people. A bunch of Jews ended up being instrumental in creating the atomic bomb. Genocide is obviously tremendously horrible and we know its not the answer. But what you would have suggested? Your people's land is being taken away and you have a historically belligerent France, England trying to stop any threats to their old world dominance, as well as a re-arming Soviet Union with a dangerous, violence and conquering based ideology surrounding you. Add in the US involving itself in European affairs.
Jews and other threats to the Reich weren't killed for sadistic pleasure or revenge. And the Jews were very much a threat to Socialist Germany as well as the war effort. Holocaust was one of the horrors of civilized history but revisionist history on the circumstances stifles understanding of the human element of "how did Hitler convince..."
Easy for us to sit back and condemn the way a country dealt with a threat when we are bordered by the 2 biggest oceans in the world and 2 relatively prideless nations who have never had the slightest ambition to be a world power.

Posted on 7/19/15 at 3:24 pm to Tiger1242
The world stage was being set up for war, and Hitler was the charismatic fascist the illuminati put in place to get the war they wanted.
Posted on 7/19/15 at 3:43 pm to Tiger1242
quote:
How in the hell were so many people willing to help/encourage/look the other way while millions were mass murdered for no reason?
Collective ego
Popular
Back to top



3







