Started By
Message

re: Here's what LSU law professor said to get suspended

Posted on 2/12/25 at 11:57 am to
Posted by guzziguy
Lake Forest
Member since Jun 2022
996 posts
Posted on 2/12/25 at 11:57 am to
Why do 'Murican joos hate Trump so much?
Posted by HarryBalzack
Member since Oct 2012
16357 posts
Posted on 2/12/25 at 12:00 pm to
If that's the full extent of his comments, then HR & the school president have a legal problem that could become an accreditation problem.
Posted by chRxis
None of your fricking business
Member since Feb 2008
27933 posts
Posted on 2/12/25 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

As a professor, you can't just say anything you want.

you can, but things you say do have consequence... i just don't think that what he had to say rose to the level of the State of Louisiana basically censuring his speech...

should he have said it? probably not... i wouldn't go on a tirade about poiltics in a public forum like that, but that's me..
Posted by dallastigers
Member since Dec 2003
10609 posts
Posted on 2/12/25 at 12:11 pm to


Why does the judge use “certain” in this comment?
quote:

They should be able to tell if they're a tree-hugging liberal or a certain-flag-waiving conservative.

I don’t think I have seen it phrased like this before.
Posted by jflsufan
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Mar 2013
5177 posts
Posted on 2/12/25 at 12:53 pm to
quote:

Exactly. Given the diatribe this guy just went on, can you really say that a conservative Republican law student would feel comfortable having an honest dialogue in his class? I’d say those students now have their speech suppressed.


I go to Loyola law School in New Orleans and this guy would fit right in over here. As a conservative, middle aged, white male, I feel like I am in enemy territory every day at school.
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
87396 posts
Posted on 2/12/25 at 1:11 pm to
quote:

As a professor, you can't just say anything you want.

you can, but things you say do have consequence
That was implied given what I was responding to. For anyone else bringing up rights, the general statement you'll find is:
quote:

Teachers are given free speech rights under the First Amendment, but they may not promote their personal or political agendas. This is not protected speech in this setting.
Posted by steve123
Member since Jul 2011
1376 posts
Posted on 2/12/25 at 1:12 pm to
Well, I’d make 2 arguments in that regard:
1) The threshold isn’t (and shouldn’t be) that their grades felt threatened. It should be whether their free speech is threatened or not. I would say common sense tells you that if a professor just proclaimed himself to be a staunch democrat followed by “eff the president and the governor,” I’m not chomping at the bit to announce any Republican viewpoints in that class;
2) good luck getting students to come testify against a professor who’s teaching a class they are enrolled in. I mean, come on….who in their right mind is going to do that? The professor holds all the cards here.
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
33142 posts
Posted on 2/12/25 at 1:16 pm to
Why is there an expectation that you have no consequences for your speech?

I could never say that kind of vulgar language at work and not see repercussions. Most of you would have consequences to deal with.

Why is this guy different? Why is academia different from the rest of the professional world where vulgarity and emotional outbursts are allowed?
This post was edited on 2/12/25 at 1:19 pm
Posted by member12
Bob's Country Bunker
Member since May 2008
33142 posts
Posted on 2/12/25 at 1:22 pm to
quote:

F*** Landry


Right on.

But inappropriate in any professional setting.
Posted by chRxis
None of your fricking business
Member since Feb 2008
27933 posts
Posted on 2/12/25 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

they may not promote their personal or political agendas

and see that's pretty open to discussion... promoting a political agenda, the way i'd interpret that, is stumping for a particular candidate/ideology, trying to sway students/staff in a certain direction, campaigning/advocating for a particular person/ideology, etc...

not just voicing an opinion, even if political in nature...
Posted by AlxTgr
Kyre Banorg
Member since Oct 2003
87396 posts
Posted on 2/12/25 at 2:05 pm to
quote:

and see that's pretty open to discussion... promoting a political agenda, the way i'd interpret that, is stumping for a particular candidate/ideology, trying to sway students/staff in a certain direction, campaigning/advocating for a particular person/ideology, etc...

not just voicing an opinion, even if political in nature...
I could not disagree more. Did you read what he said?
Posted by PalletJack
LA by birth, TX by choice
Member since Oct 2024
1068 posts
Posted on 2/12/25 at 3:16 pm to
He said governor with a hard R sound. If he had said govna everyone would know he was joking
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
79430 posts
Posted on 2/12/25 at 5:07 pm to
quote:

Furious about what?


Free speach being suppressed.

Posted by ExtraGravy
Member since Nov 2018
975 posts
Posted on 2/12/25 at 5:11 pm to
quote:

I go to Loyola law School in New Orleans and this guy would fit right in over here. As a conservative, middle aged, white male, I feel like I am in enemy territory every day at school.


if "middle aged", what's the gameplan for the rest of life, after taking 3/4 years of intensive study and a couple hundred grand to get a JD? And recouping the cost of the degree as well as enough money on top of that to make the switch worthwhile?
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
25893 posts
Posted on 2/12/25 at 5:12 pm to
quote:

Free speach being suppressed.


Posted by Columbus
Member since Jan 2021
198 posts
Posted on 2/12/25 at 5:23 pm to
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

This dude is fricking scum. Get his arse Governor Landry! He has the right idea about Tenure!


Posted by jchamil
Member since Nov 2009
19485 posts
Posted on 2/12/25 at 5:49 pm to
Wtf? Is that really one of his exam hypos?
Posted by SouthPlains
Member since Jul 2023
1118 posts
Posted on 2/12/25 at 6:01 pm to
That’s about par for the course on his exam hypos - and not atypical of law school test questions, in general. Long rambling bullshite (just like his lectures).

Torts is probably the most straightforward subject in 1L and he couldn’t teach it for shite when I had him almost 15 years ago.

Nice guy. Awful educator.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21764 posts
Posted on 2/12/25 at 6:15 pm to
I am lucky to have studied engineering and stem topics where I can count on exactly 3 fingers the number of times I heard political commentary across undergrad and grad school.

Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
85666 posts
Posted on 2/12/25 at 6:24 pm to
The only person who’s ever sat for a criminal law exam in law school and thinks that hypo is abnormal is Jeff Landry.

That should tell you he’s trying to turn it into culture war red meat.
This post was edited on 2/12/25 at 6:30 pm
Jump to page
Page First 8 9 10 11 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram