re: Has biological weapons become a bigger threat than nukes?

Its no hidden secret that if you want to hurt the US you attack our economy. You drop a bomb and that only has an impact within a certain radius of where it was dropped. You attack with biological warfare.. That shite hits everywhere.

I am not saying the coronavirus is a biological attack on us because I have no evidence, but I bet this is giving other countries some ideas.

I'd much rather a biological than an all out nuclear war. We are talking hundreds to thousands of nukes.

No. Effective protective measures against nukes are orders of magnitude more expensive or unavailable than aegis against biological or chemical weapons.

Chemical weapons are the best out of the triad

quote:

---

Am I just to accept without question that it is a coincidence that of all the places in China for this to start it just happened to start where China has its bio research facility centered on coronaviruses?

---

I’m confused by the selective scrutiny however.

You can’t trust what China says, but you choose to believe they are telling you the truth that it started in Wuhan? Would you still believe it was the starting point if the lab wasn’t there to focus your conspiracy attentions? There are a lot of indications it has been spreading in rural China and the source was an infected patron/shopkeeper(s) of the market.

Not that the virus was started there, just that a lot of people who were infected were also there.

It could have been 3-4 booths from the same remote rural village that drove in on the same truck.

Also, it’s worth noting that you are wayyyyyy overstating the facility’s focus. Yes, coronavirus research happened there, but it is far from the primary focus of the place. The headliners would prob be whatever is in the BSL-4 segment of the lab.

I’m sure there are coronavirus papers you could have made a connection to in every major city with biomedical/university research accruing.

It’s not the smoking gun coincidence you make it out to be.

In any case, question all you want. But you seem to be taking the lazy way and going: “Well, I don’t understand the evidence who it’s not there as far as I am concerned.”

quote:

---

I’m just saying corona wasn’t man made...because it wasn’t lmao.

---

So you are the expert on COVID. Let me ask you then, it is completely impossible that it accidentally escaped a Wuhan research lab? Like there isn't even the slightest chance that it possibly got out? Not saying on purpose, even by accident.

Being researched in a lab =/= being man-made.

Why is it such a conspiracy for china to study the virus tree of a virus that caused SARS, and MERS that is endemic to that region? It would be absolutely idiotic and counter-intuitive for the chinese to not study corona.

Yea its technically possible the virus got out of a lab, but It’s Occam’s razor that a new strain of corona developed in an area where new strains of corona have historically evolved. especially in conditions of wet markets.

Hoofbeats = horses. Or wings flapping at night = bats, not test tubes.

quote:

---

It’s Occam’s razor that a new strain of corona developed in an area

---

Bat strain that then underwent major mutatation to completely change host vector to pangolin and then completely change host vector again to human with separate major mutation. And then develop and maintain a new ACE receptor binding for human to human transmission, that's a shite load of mutation....which....Um...is... not the occam's razor hypothesis for this thing's origin.

Occam's razor states that it escaped from the laboratory 100 yards away from your multi-step "random" mutation wet market theory. The only BSL 4 lab in all of China... right across the street. Which was already publishing data on human ACE receptor binding in novel coronavirus strains. Huh, funny how that works...

That's Occam's Razor for the origin of this, bro.

Nah bro