- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
FYI, oral argument before La.SC for the St.G. case is this morning around 10/10:30 am
Posted on 1/23/24 at 8:05 am
Posted on 1/23/24 at 8:05 am
A livestream will be available.
LINK /
It's the second matter on the docket and argument for the first ine starts at 9:30 (with each side getting up to 30 minutes each).
LINK /
It's the second matter on the docket and argument for the first ine starts at 9:30 (with each side getting up to 30 minutes each).
11
Posted on 1/23/24 at 8:06 am to udtiger
Did they get good lawyers this time?
Posted on 1/23/24 at 8:09 am to udtiger
SWB’s argument is that you can’t follow the law and the will of the voters because taking tax bases away is racist.
Posted on 1/23/24 at 9:24 am to WeeWee
Bump
Posted on 1/23/24 at 9:34 am to udtiger
Could be a little earlier if both sides on the first docket item don’t use all their time.
Posted on 1/23/24 at 9:56 am to udtiger
How long until a decision is rendered?
Posted on 1/23/24 at 9:59 am to udtiger
quote:
oral argument
Had one of those with the wife last night. I've never won one.
Posted on 1/23/24 at 10:04 am to OysterPoBoy
quote:
Had one of those with the wife last night. I've never won one.
That is one of those things where, even when you win, you lose.
Posted on 1/23/24 at 10:13 am to WeeWee
quote:
SWB’s argument is that you can’t follow the law and the will of the voters because taking tax bases away is racist.
Broome got bounced, the Appeals Court tossed her.
Posted on 1/23/24 at 10:15 am to doubleb
How is Lamont Cole still part of the case then?
The board hasn’t approved legal action with him representing them and, on top of that, there are serious questions as to whether he is even eligible for the seat he has.
The board hasn’t approved legal action with him representing them and, on top of that, there are serious questions as to whether he is even eligible for the seat he has.
Posted on 1/23/24 at 10:15 am to td1
quote:
Could be a little earlier if both sides on the first docket item don’t use all their time
The way its going, they're probably going to use all the time for the first one.
Posted on 1/23/24 at 10:24 am to udtiger
Please God make it happen
Posted on 1/23/24 at 10:27 am to udtiger
What are they arguering today? What is the current status?
Posted on 1/23/24 at 10:38 am to LSUFanHouston
About to start.
Posted on 1/23/24 at 10:39 am to LSUFanHouston
quote:
What are they arguering today? What is the current status?
District Court ruled against St.G. 1st Circuit upheld, on different grounds from District Court.
Posted on 1/23/24 at 10:47 am to udtiger
Man, this first attorney sounds like he's on the struggle bus up there 
Posted on 1/23/24 at 10:54 am to udtiger
Not going well right now for StG
Posted on 1/23/24 at 10:54 am to Epic Cajun
Yeah.
Standing is a weak argument. They should not have lead with that.
Standing is a weak argument. They should not have lead with that.
Posted on 1/23/24 at 10:55 am to In The Know
I don’t like the argument the attorney’s making against Cole being disqualified. The justices are challenging him hard.
Posted on 1/23/24 at 11:00 am to In The Know
Attorney 2 is much more polished and appears to have a better argument.
Page 1 of 9
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News