- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Found out I'm "related" to this girl I started seeing...***Update Page 12
Posted on 1/29/18 at 11:01 am to Commandeaux
Posted on 1/29/18 at 11:01 am to Commandeaux
quote:
Are we related?
Yes.
But, it sounds like your mind is made up. My thinking is that there are so many women out there who aren't related to you, why pick one who is?
Posted on 1/29/18 at 11:01 am to Commandeaux
smash and then tell her
Posted on 1/29/18 at 11:01 am to Commandeaux
Posted on 1/29/18 at 11:01 am to Commandeaux
The bloodline is not close enough to make any difference. Enjoy yourselves. Gives you something to talk about
Posted on 1/29/18 at 11:01 am to TigerDeacon
quote:
Ya'll are 2nd cousins once removed.
So technically legal, but I'd just find a new girlfriend if I were you.
Posted on 1/29/18 at 11:02 am to Commandeaux
quote:
Are we related?
Yes, but it's not a big deal. Even 1st cousins isn't as big a deal as it's made out to be.
Few Risks Seen To the Children Of 1st Cousins
quote:
Contrary to widely held beliefs and longstanding taboos in America, first cousins can have children together without a great risk of birth defects or genetic disease, scientists are reporting today. They say there is no biological reason to discourage cousins from marrying.
First cousins are somewhat more likely than unrelated parents to have a child with a serious birth defect, mental retardation or genetic disease, but their increased risk is nowhere near as large as most people think, the scientists said.
In the general population, the risk that a child will be born with a serious problem like spina bifida or cystic fibrosis is 3 percent to 4 percent; to that background risk, first cousins must add another 1.7 to 2.8 percentage points, the report said.
Although the increase represents a near doubling of the risk, the result is still not considered large enough to discourage cousins from having children, said Dr. Arno Motulsky, a professor emeritus of medicine and genome sciences at the University of Washington, and the senior author of the report.
''In terms of general risks in life it's not very high,'' Dr. Motulsky said. Even at its worst, 7 percent, he said, ''93 percent of the time, nothing is going to happen.''
Posted on 1/29/18 at 11:02 am to Commandeaux
Think of it this way...
Your grandmother or grandfather (parents of your mother) and her great-grandmother or great-grandfather (parents of her grandmother) were siblings.
That's pretty close, man.
Your grandmother or grandfather (parents of your mother) and her great-grandmother or great-grandfather (parents of her grandmother) were siblings.
That's pretty close, man.
Posted on 1/29/18 at 11:02 am to Commandeaux
4 fricking pages and no request of pics of this piece of arse in question?
This post was edited on 1/29/18 at 11:03 am
Posted on 1/29/18 at 11:03 am to Commandeaux
Why go across the street when you can go across the hall!!!
Roll Tide!!!
Roll Tide!!!
Posted on 1/29/18 at 11:04 am to The Mick
quote:
There's no great grandparent involved in the OP scenario.

Posted on 1/29/18 at 11:04 am to Commandeaux
if something this trivial stops you, you didnt really like her in the first place
Posted on 1/29/18 at 11:04 am to Commandeaux
quote:
Are we related?
we're all homosapiens brah, go hit that son.
Posted on 1/29/18 at 11:04 am to ItNeverRains
In 07 I dated a girl from 250 miles away. No family connection traceable. Found out 4 years later that her real grandfather and my grandmother were uncle and niece.
I took three seconds to laugh at it and moved on.
Given that any of the older families essentially have practiced line breeding, a second or third cousin removed doesn't matter.
I took three seconds to laugh at it and moved on.
Given that any of the older families essentially have practiced line breeding, a second or third cousin removed doesn't matter.
Posted on 1/29/18 at 11:04 am to Commandeaux
It's not the messed up kids that you need to worry about (as people have pointed out the changes at that distance are slim). What I'd be worried about is just how weird it would be with the rest of your family members. Just seems so awkward.
Posted on 1/29/18 at 11:05 am to Richard Castle
I think that's second cousins once removed.
Posted on 1/29/18 at 11:05 am to terd ferguson
My bad. I agree, 2nd cousins once removed.
Posted on 1/29/18 at 11:05 am to Commandeaux
This is such a Louisiana/Alabama thread. 
Posted on 1/29/18 at 11:07 am to kywildcatfanone
quote:Agreed. If this was Kentucky he'd be dating his male 2nd cousin once removed. Hillbilly don't care what they bang.
This is such a Louisiana/Alabama thread
Posted on 1/29/18 at 11:07 am to LaBR4
quote:
How did you meet her?
family reunion
Popular
Back to top


0










