Started By
Message

re: For all the Millennials crying about housing costs, here you go

Posted on 8/26/26 at 8:31 am to
Posted by TexasTiger33
United States of America
Member since Feb 2022
16220 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 8:31 am to
quote:

You don't seem to even comprehend the discussion being had
I find your comment to be somewhat condescending and frankly almost demeaning to a slight degree

Thank you for your attention to this matter
Posted by Loup
Ferriday
Member since Apr 2019
17760 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 8:37 am to
Dang, just looked up the zillow listing for a house I rented until 2017. Built in 1967. Boone Drive area in Baton Rouge. It sold late 2017 for $145k. It was a dump and what most of us would consider a starter home. Looks like all they did to it before selling was whitewash the brick, throw some waterproof vinyl flooring down, and painted. It sold again in 2023 for $198k and again earlier this year for $290k.
This post was edited on 8/26/26 at 8:39 am
Posted by LanierSpots
Gulf of America / Sarasota FL
Member since Sep 2010
71904 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 8:40 am to
quote:

You don't seem to even comprehend the discussion being had





Im not telling you the ratio is equal. Im telling you its possible. But you cant have it all up front. You will have to work to get there.

Which was the original comment I had.

A dual income family making 100K can afford that home with ease. If you want it.




Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
37596 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 8:44 am to
quote:

But you cant have it all up front. You will have to work to get there.


True, you get a hell of a lot less up front than you have in a long time

quote:

A dual income family making 100K can afford that home with ease. If you want it.


Most dual income families don’t make $100k.

I don’t know what point you think you are making.
Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
40836 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 8:47 am to
quote:

Sure it is. When I bought that house, it was 1988. I bought that home for 47K and sold it 10 years later for 90K. I was 20 years old and when I bought it, I was making around 24K per year. My wife was going to school and only working about 3 days a week as a bank teller.

If you compare that to what salaries are today, it is very modest. You cant just compare the cost. You have to also compare the income.


are you suggesting someone making 67k should purchase a 265.8K house?
Posted by LanierSpots
Gulf of America / Sarasota FL
Member since Sep 2010
71904 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 8:55 am to
quote:

are you suggesting someone making 67k should purchase a 265.8K house?


I didnt say 67K. I said 100K combined



Posted by SoDakHawk
South Dakota
Member since Jun 2014
10916 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 8:56 am to
quote:

Nope. To double every 10 years, the appreciation rate has to be 7% a year.


Correct. It's been anywhere from 4-7% over time. There are many factors though, location being a big one.
Posted by Dragula
Laguna Seca
Member since Jun 2020
7024 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 8:59 am to
quote:

They’ve gone down 3 years in a row



Mine has increased the maximum amount the last 3yrs, what are you talking about? ??
This post was edited on 8/26/26 at 9:03 am
Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
37596 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 9:16 am to
quote:

Mine has increased the maximum amount the last 3yrs, what are you talking about? ??


Your assessed value may have gone up by the maximum allowable percentage, but your rates went down

This was done at the state level as property tax relief due to budget surpluses
Posted by Dragula
Laguna Seca
Member since Jun 2020
7024 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 9:31 am to
quote:

Your assessed value may have gone up by the maximum allowable percentage, but your rates went down This was done at the state level as property tax relief due to budget surpluses


Assessed value is factored into final the annual property tax calculation.

My appraised value increased the max 10% cap each of the past 3yrs, thus increasing the total annual tax bill owed as stated in my OP.



Posted by Dire Wolf
bawcomville
Member since Sep 2008
40836 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 9:38 am to
quote:

I didnt say 67K. I said 100K combined



24k in 1988 is 67k today

3 days a week as a bank teller and going to school is pretty much a wash in terms of income.

Posted by Mingo Was His NameO
Brooklyn
Member since Mar 2016
37596 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 9:43 am to
quote:

My appraised value increased the max 10% cap each of the past 3yrs, thus increasing the total annual tax bill owed as stated in my OP.


That’s your fault big dog.
Posted by TideCPA
Member since Jan 2012
14359 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 9:53 am to
quote:

Which was the original comment I had.

A dual income family making 100K can afford that home with ease. If you want it.
You stated you bought a house for 47k making 24k (completely disregarding spousal income). In other words, your starter home was about 2x ONE earner's salary.

In order to be able to afford that exact same house today with that exact same set of facts (house cost 2x salary, married couple, one primary earner, one spouse part-time to pay for school), that primary earner would have to make $135k.

Do you not see the problem here?
This post was edited on 8/26/26 at 9:55 am
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
41946 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 10:06 am to
quote:

And nearly $15k/yr in property taxes



Much cheaper than the property+income taxes in Louisiana.
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
41946 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 10:16 am to
quote:

So you are telling me that a two income young family lets say is making 100K/year together cant afford a mortgage of $1500 a month now?


Where is this 1500 a month coming from? The house you posted, even with a healthy downpayment would be around 2k a month for PITI.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
481373 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

Im not telling you the ratio is equal.


Are you dismissing the impact of that ratio on the concept of "starter homes"? That's what you seem to be doing.

If a home isn't affordable, how can it be considered a "starter home"?
Posted by Geauxld Finger
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2005
32628 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 12:54 pm to
Just skip your next 31000 Starbucks coffees and put it towards your down payment to avoid that pesky PMI!
Posted by NC_Tigah
Ray Bans for Max Polarization
Member since Sep 2003
140842 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 3:51 pm to
quote:

JohnnyKilroy
Fascinating.


Posted by jwalk38
Member since Nov 2021
220 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 4:07 pm to
Is $450K supposed to be affordable?
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
41946 posts
Posted on 8/26/26 at 4:09 pm to
NC already argued in this thread that $350-$400+ per square foot is “affordable”
Jump to page
Page First 10 11 12 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 12 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram