- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
EBR baws, what are your thoughts on the MovEBR proposal?
Posted on 12/7/18 at 3:42 pm
Posted on 12/7/18 at 3:42 pm
I'm torn. I hate more taxes and do not trust Broome and friends to not somehow redirect supposedly "untouchable" tax revenue, but many of those projects would be great.
Give me your thoughts, baws.
Give me your thoughts, baws.
Posted on 12/7/18 at 3:43 pm to TigersSEC2010
vote no. if broome is behind it im voting no.
Posted on 12/7/18 at 3:48 pm to TigersSEC2010
I don’t trust it. Especially, when I heard that they’re claiming this will do more than a loop would ever do.
Posted on 12/7/18 at 3:51 pm to TigersSEC2010
If you like giving money to people like Broome go to college by the interstate and hand money out your car window
At least that money would stimulate the economy
At least that money would stimulate the economy
Posted on 12/7/18 at 3:51 pm to TigersSEC2010
I voted yes for it already.
The traffic situation simply can’t be kicked down the road much further, and people hoping for a gas tax increase to fund just the state roads, there’s already opposition towards that building up.
The traffic situation simply can’t be kicked down the road much further, and people hoping for a gas tax increase to fund just the state roads, there’s already opposition towards that building up.
This post was edited on 12/7/18 at 3:52 pm
Posted on 12/7/18 at 3:52 pm to TigersSEC2010
At least 24% of the plan is going to finish Green Light projects and we are already being taxed for them.
Broome is in control. Who knows if she's going to require minority participation? Who knows whose projects will be completed first? Who knows whether the engineers and consultants she hires will be qualified of just a political ally?
Vote no
Broome is in control. Who knows if she's going to require minority participation? Who knows whose projects will be completed first? Who knows whether the engineers and consultants she hires will be qualified of just a political ally?
Vote no
This post was edited on 12/7/18 at 3:52 pm
Posted on 12/7/18 at 3:52 pm to TigersSEC2010
A certain amount of our current taxes go toward road projects. They say the new tax will only go to road projects. What that really means is that the amount that currently goes toward road projects will now go to something else at the mayor's discretion. This is how they always seem to trick people.
Posted on 12/7/18 at 3:54 pm to TigersSEC2010
The city parish has contracts now that they do not abide by. Nothing is done to force them to abide by the present contracts. They do what they want.
What makes anyone think the city parish government will not get their hands on this cash and use it for something else?
What makes anyone think the city parish government will not get their hands on this cash and use it for something else?
This post was edited on 12/7/18 at 3:55 pm
Posted on 12/7/18 at 3:54 pm to chryso
Baton Rouge city government intends to follow the visionary leaders in our sister city of Jackson Mississippi
Posted on 12/7/18 at 3:55 pm to TigersSEC2010
I abide by the time honored Baton Rouge tradition of bitching about something, voting No on the solution, then bitching about it once more
Posted on 12/7/18 at 3:57 pm to TigersSEC2010
I would much rather pay more in taxes to upgrade our parks or to demolish BREc
Posted on 12/7/18 at 3:59 pm to Tigeralum2008
quote:
I abide by the time honored Baton Rouge tradition of bitching about something, voting No on the solution, then bitching about it once more
Considering how BR has had just one comprehensive road plan in the last 50 or years, I tend to wonder at what point does that very mindset catch up with the entire area.
Posted on 12/7/18 at 3:59 pm to TigersSEC2010
I would vote Yes if we could lower or eliminate other taxes like BREC, Libraries, COA etc.
I am voting No. Our taxes are very high for the crappy product we get.
I am voting No. Our taxes are very high for the crappy product we get.
Posted on 12/7/18 at 4:04 pm to c on z
quote:
Considering how BR has had just one comprehensive road plan in the last 50 or years, I tend to wonder at what point does that very mindset catch up with the entire area.
And that road plan is not complete yet and they want to start another plan to help complete that one and start another plan.
Can't we do one at a time?
Posted on 12/7/18 at 4:05 pm to TigersSEC2010
Is their a detailed list of exactly which projects these new taxes will be funding?
Posted on 12/7/18 at 4:06 pm to TigersSEC2010
quote:
If the road and traffic tax passes on December 8th, the revenue generated shall be spent only on the projects listed in the approved plan. This tax revenue cannot be used for any other projects other than the projects specified in the MoveEBR plan.
quote:
PROPOSITION
Shall the Parish of East Baton Rouge Capital Improvements District (“District”) be authorized to levy a one-half of one percent (0.50%) sales tax (the “Sales Tax”) (an estimated $46,000,000 is reasonably expected to be collected for one entire year), for 30 years, commencing April 1, 2019, to and including March 31, 2049, and shall the proceeds thereof be used (A) (i) to construct or improve roads, including drainage projects and traffic synchronization, within the cities of Baton Rouge, Baker, Central and Zachary and the Parish of East Baton Rouge (the “Parish”), (ii) to improve existing corridors to increase mobility, including signal synchronization and sidewalks, and (iii) to construct community enhancement projects, including drainage, lights and sidewalks, within the cities of Baton Rouge, Baker, Central and Zachary and the Parish, and (B) to improve the Advanced Traffic Management Center, such improvements prioritized (i) within the Parish and Baton Rouge as described in the MovEBR Plan dated August 8, 2018, and (ii) within Baker, Zachary and Central, as determined by the applicable governing authority, and shall the aforementioned political subdivisions be authorized to fund proceeds of the Sales Tax into bonds as permitted by the laws of Louisiana?
quote:
CONSTRUCTING COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT ROAD PROJECTS, INCLUDING ROAD REPAIR, DITCHES OR DRAINAGE, LIGHTS, CURBS, LANDSCAPING, SIDEWALKS:
quote:
PROJECT 1: PARISH-WIDE FUTURE COMMUNITY ENHANCEMENT CALL FOR PROJECTS: Annual call for projects as submitted by Metro Council Members to include sidewalks, multi-use paths, street lighting, road repairs, ditches or drainage, curbs, and landscaping.
LINK
Found the Metro Council loophole
Posted on 12/7/18 at 4:08 pm to LSUJML
(no message)
This post was edited on 12/7/18 at 4:17 pm
Posted on 12/7/18 at 4:09 pm to Tigeralum2008
quote:
I abide by the time honored Baton Rouge tradition of bitching about something, voting No on the solution, then bitching about it once more
The flaw in that logic is that what you're voting against is actually a "solution".
Posted on 12/7/18 at 4:10 pm to LSUJML
quote:
Found the Metro Council loophole
We're going to line Plank Road with shrubs
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News