Started By
Message

re: Do We Need Laws To Prevent Investigators From Using Certain Interrogation Methods?

Posted on 8/6/20 at 8:27 pm to
Posted by Boston911
Lafayette
Member since Dec 2013
2601 posts
Posted on 8/6/20 at 8:27 pm to
I’ll bite,,,,what’s a method they use to get someone to confess to something they didn’t do?
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
148031 posts
Posted on 8/6/20 at 8:28 pm to
Chris do you ever just go outside, walk around and get some fresh air?
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
76259 posts
Posted on 8/6/20 at 8:30 pm to
quote:

You and me know this, but how many 18, 19.. 20 year olds know this or uneducated people know this?

Every person that is arrested, or even questioned in depth in regards to a particular crime is read their Miranda Warning. If they aren't, then everything gained from the encounter is inadmissible, usually.

The most important thing any individual can do, and it should be taught in every school, is learn their basic rights in regards to the law. Every parent should explain to their children not only the rights they have, but also the rights that the police have. It is the individual's responsibility to know these things. Being that knowledge is the ONLY recourse anyone has on the side of the road, we do not need to limit ourselves in that knowledge.

Know your rights, know the officer's rights, and show common courtesy and respect. These three things will get most anyone through most encounters with law enforcement, innocent or not.
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
122548 posts
Posted on 8/6/20 at 8:32 pm to
quote:

Chris do you ever just go outside, walk around and get some fresh air?


Yes. But obviously I don't walk around.. But I do wear headphones and listen to podcast. Why do you ask?
Posted by ThanosIsADemocrat
The Garden
Member since May 2018
9395 posts
Posted on 8/6/20 at 8:36 pm to
quote:


But they talk about how they get people to admit to crimes they didn't do

How dumb does one have to be to admit to a crime they didn’t do?


Personal Agency must come into factor when we make laws(not that we need more laws on the books)
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
122548 posts
Posted on 8/6/20 at 8:37 pm to
quote:

I’ll bite,,,,what’s a method they use to get someone to confess to something they didn’t do?


If they bring in someone (let's say an 18, 19... 20 year old) and they leave him in the interrogation room trying to get him to confess. He didn't commit the crime, but after hours they tell him they know its him because such and such saw him there and they have his friend in the next room telling them that the kid they are interrogating did it.. So they have one person who saw him there and a confession from someone saying they did it.

After being in there for hours and hours, they might break and just go ahead and say they did it.
Posted by OWLFAN86
Erotic Novelist
Member since Jun 2004
198220 posts
Posted on 8/6/20 at 8:39 pm to
you are so stupid its actually amazing
Posted by TigerstuckinMS
Member since Nov 2005
33687 posts
Posted on 8/6/20 at 8:40 pm to
We already have that law, tard.

Posted by OWLFAN86
Erotic Novelist
Member since Jun 2004
198220 posts
Posted on 8/6/20 at 8:41 pm to
quote:

I’ll bite,,,,what’s a method they use to get someone to confess to something they didn’t do?


lock them in a room with chris
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
122548 posts
Posted on 8/6/20 at 8:41 pm to
I found a picture of you...

Posted by OWLFAN86
Erotic Novelist
Member since Jun 2004
198220 posts
Posted on 8/6/20 at 8:42 pm to
sick burn, how will I survive
Posted by Hangit
The Green Swamp
Member since Aug 2014
47807 posts
Posted on 8/6/20 at 8:44 pm to
quote:

You and me know this, but how many 18, 19.. 20 year olds know this or uneducated people know this?


That's a great question Chris. The answer is...Every single one of them. Miranda rights are read to every person arrested. They are then explained to them if they do not understand. So, rest assured that every person knows they have a right to have an attorney.
Posted by Obtuse1
Westside Bodymore Yo
Member since Sep 2016
31244 posts
Posted on 8/6/20 at 8:45 pm to
quote:

How dumb does one have to be to admit to a crime they didn’t do?


There aren't many Mensa members that give false confessions but the legal system has an obligation to protect those can be swayed into giving false confessions.
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
184770 posts
Posted on 8/6/20 at 8:46 pm to
Just ask for an attorney right away. Problem solved.
Posted by McVick
Member since Jan 2011
4638 posts
Posted on 8/6/20 at 8:47 pm to
quote:

How dumb does one have to be to admit to a crime they didn’t do?


Maybe ask Kevin Richardson, Antron McCray, Raymond Santana, Korey Wise, or Yusef Salaam about how it happens.
Posted by OWLFAN86
Erotic Novelist
Member since Jun 2004
198220 posts
Posted on 8/6/20 at 8:47 pm to
Do we need laws against murder and drunk driving and abuse of the handicapped?
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
184770 posts
Posted on 8/6/20 at 8:49 pm to
quote:

you are so stupid its actually amazing



The few brain cells Chris has left probably only see each other on Christmas.
Posted by gizmothepug
Louisiana
Member since Apr 2015
8875 posts
Posted on 8/6/20 at 8:50 pm to
I don’t know about laws because it probably wouldn’t matter in the long run but that type of behavior happens all the time and a newly passed law won’t change that behavior. It comes down to good people vs people that don’t give a shite.
Posted by USMEagles
Member since Jan 2018
11811 posts
Posted on 8/6/20 at 8:58 pm to
We absolutely need that. No public servant should be allowed to lie to a citizen in an official capacity. "Sting" operations, in which a citizen is enticed to commit a crime where no such opportunity would otherwise exist, should be illegal.

I also take issue with the practice of trying defendants together in a single trial. This is completely incompatible with any notion of justice or freedom.
Posted by BhamDore
Nashville
Member since Aug 2009
6520 posts
Posted on 8/6/20 at 8:59 pm to
1969 Frazier v Cupp is one of the worst rulings the Supreme Court have ever affirmed. They allowed police and other government agents to lie and be deceptive in order to get the desired outcome.

It placed irreparable damage between citizens and law enforcement and a strong distrust that will probably never be mended.

Its always best just to remain silent no matter the circumstances.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram