Started By
Message

re: Do Russian history students learn about WWII the other way around?

Posted on 1/8/17 at 8:28 pm to
Posted by OWLFAN86
Erotic Novelist
Member since Jun 2004
197943 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 8:28 pm to
quote:

WWII ended in 1945, the cold war started in 1947... My math says the cold war started 2 years after WWII was over.


Allies were spying on each other while WW2 was ongoing. The were already trying to carve up the best parts of Europe and the Middle east before the end of the war,,,

so..
Posted by TIGERSandFROGS
Member since Jul 2007
3809 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 8:49 pm to
quote:

Allies were spying on each other while WW2 was ongoing. The were already trying to carve up the best parts of Europe and the Middle east before the end of the war,,,

so..



You're basically arguing semantics. It was a Cold War so it's hard to assign a single event that was the beginning, however I don't think that you can claim a Cold War was ongoing when our troops were meeting with handshakes and hugs in Germany and Patton and Zhukov were having joint parades and banquets to celebrate a common victory.
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
122525 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 8:58 pm to
quote:

You're basically arguing semantics. It was a Cold War so it's hard to assign a single event that was the beginning, however I don't think that you can claim a Cold War was ongoing when our troops were meeting with handshakes and hugs in Germany and Patton and Zhukov were having joint parades and banquets to celebrate a common victory.



Exactly.
Posted by OWLFAN86
Erotic Novelist
Member since Jun 2004
197943 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 9:14 pm to
start a thread chris


any subject
Posted by TheJunction
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2014
2158 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 9:20 pm to
Really enjoying this thread
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
23912 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 9:31 pm to
quote:

Edgy post of the day: Would we have been better off had Germany won WWI? WWII likely wouldn't have happened, at least not in the capacity of how it kicked off.

WWII began as a direct result of the Treaty of Versailles.


It wasn't so much who "won", it was the conditions of the treaty.
Nobody really won the actual war, it was stalemated, and everyone got tired of fighting and dying. Germany lost the diplomatic end of it, and got stuck with a huge bill that completely destroyed their economy and emasculated their military (big blow to their national pride). Conditions were ripe for an angry uprising.

I don't doubt that the Russians teach WW2 differently; Germany took all of the European nations, and slaughtered the Russians by the millions. Imagine Canada brutally pushing down to the Mason Dixon line- they were hanging on by a thread against what seemed like the Apocalypse.
I doubt they cared any about the Pacific theater, so long as the Japs didn't come hit them from the Southeast.
Posted by Dude man 25
Member since Dec 2016
646 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 9:51 pm to
Clearly joking
Posted by ChewyDante
Member since Jan 2007
17230 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 9:57 pm to
quote:

We were also taught that Indian soldiers fought on front lines for British. As usual British did not keep the promises made to India. Don't see how they believed Brits when they been lying to you for 40 years


Interestingly enough, the Germans formed an Indian volunteer legion amongst Indian nationalists who shared a common enemy in the British.









quote:

The Indian Legion (German: Indische Legion), officially the Free India Legion (German: Legion Freies Indien) or Infantry Regiment 950 (Indian) (German: Infanterie-Regiment 950 (indisches), I.R. 950) and later the Indian Volunteer Legion of the Waffen-SS (German: Indische Freiwilligen Legion der Waffen-SS), was a military unit raised during the Second World War in Nazi Germany. Intended to serve as a liberation force for British-ruled India, it was made up of Indian prisoners of war and expatriates in Europe. Because of its origins in the Indian independence movement, it was known also as the "Tiger Legion", and the "Azad Hind Fauj". Initially raised as part of the German Army, it was part of the Waffen-SS from August 1944. Indian independence leader Subhas Chandra Bose initiated the legion's formation, as part of his efforts to win India's independence by waging war against Britain, when he came to Berlin in 1941 seeking German aid. The initial recruits in 1941 were volunteers from the Indian students resident in Germany at the time, and a handful of the Indian prisoners of war who had been captured during the North Africa Campaign. It would later draw a larger number of Indian prisoners of war as volunteers. Though it was initially raised as an assault group that would form a pathfinder to a German-Indian joint invasion of the western frontiers of British India, only a small contingent was ever put to its original intended purpose. A hundred legionnaires were parachuted into eastern Iran under Operation Bajadere and infiltrated into Baluchistan Province to undertake sabotage operations, which they reportedly did successfully, but with insignificant effect. A small contingent, including much of the Indian officer corps and enlisted leadership, was transferred to the Indian National Army in South-East Asia. The majority of the troops of the Indian Legion were only ever stationed in Europe in non-combat duties, in the Netherlands and in France until the Allied invasion. They saw action in the retreat from the Allied advance across France, fighting mostly against the French Resistance. One company was sent to Italy in 1944, where it saw action against British and Polish troops and undertook anti-partisan operations. At the time of the surrender of Nazi Germany in 1945, the remaining men of the Indian Legion made efforts to march to neutral Switzerland over the Alps, but these efforts proved futile as they were captured by American and French troops and eventually shipped back to India to face charges of treason. Because of the uproar the trials of Indians who served with the Axis caused among civilians and the military of British India, the legion members' trials were not completed.
Posted by Old Money
LSU
Member since Sep 2012
41969 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 10:03 pm to
The Germans had a few multicultural units.

Have y'all ever read General Patton's diary quotes on the Nazis/Russians?



makes you wonder about the truth in what we were taught.
This post was edited on 1/8/17 at 10:04 pm
Posted by TIGERSandFROGS
Member since Jul 2007
3809 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 10:06 pm to
Here's another interesting image--Koreans captured by the Allies while fighting for the Nazi's on the Atlantic Wall.

These poor bastards were captured by the Japanese when they invaded Korea/Manchuria, put into service in the Japanese Imperial Army as prisoners, then captured by the Russians during the border skirmishes, shipped across Russia to the Eastern Front where they fought for the Soviets and were captured, then put into service on the Atlantic Wall in a spot where the Nazis thought the invasion probably wouldn't happen...

Posted by Hawgnsincebirth55
Gods country
Member since Sep 2016
18636 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 10:08 pm to
They should've shot them all and killed anyone who cried out against the treasonous bastards. People who don't believe this method works need look no further than the American indians.
Posted by ChewyDante
Member since Jan 2007
17230 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 10:08 pm to
Patton was pretty ardently opposed to the extreme denazification policies. He gave Ike a real headache in his stint as military governor of Bavaria. Patton didn't play politics and he found himself in a very uncomfortable position being told to enforce measures that went against his better judgment. Oh, and he absolutely HATED the Russians.
Posted by Hawgnsincebirth55
Gods country
Member since Sep 2016
18636 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 10:10 pm to
I still don't think he would be OK with the nazis had he known the extent of the concentration camps
Posted by ChewyDante
Member since Jan 2007
17230 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 10:14 pm to
quote:

I still don't think he would be OK with the nazis had he known the extent of the concentration camps


Patton didn't equate all members of the Nazi Party with the policies or personages of the leadership. That's the fundamental difference. Most Nazis and Germans weren't involved in the carrying out of the Holocaust. Believe it or not, the Holocaust wasn't one of the central focuses surrounding the war and postwar period like it is today.
Posted by 6R12
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2005
12266 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 10:20 pm to
Yes they think Stalingrad was turning point.
Posted by FLBooGoTigs1
Nocatee, FL.
Member since Jan 2008
59570 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 10:43 pm to
Great Thread and Great Read


Thanks to everyone that contributed

Posted by Hawgnsincebirth55
Gods country
Member since Sep 2016
18636 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 11:10 pm to
Wish we had a history board
Posted by lsuman25
Erwinville
Member since Aug 2013
43311 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 11:22 pm to
This thread has been awesome.
Posted by WestCoastAg
Member since Oct 2012
150997 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 11:58 pm to
quote:

makes you wonder about the truth in what we were taught.

all personal opinion i guess. patton wasnt really big on the denazification process because he HATED the soviet union and saw a strong germany as an important partner to fight communism
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
43037 posts
Posted on 1/9/17 at 7:20 am to
The people of Germany facilitated the holocaust by letting Hitler take power. I know things were more complicated than a simple election, but the people of Germany had to pay for the sins of their leaders. They weren't a chosen people, a pure race, but stooges at the hands ofthe Nazis who were quite evil.

Jump to page
Page First 9 10 11 12 13 14
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram