Started By
Message
locked post

Delta Airlines to United - Hold My Beer

Posted on 5/4/17 at 9:11 am
Posted by tylercsbn9
Cypress, TX
Member since Feb 2004
66973 posts
Posted on 5/4/17 at 9:11 am
LINK

Absolutely horrid customer service.

Delta was right in that the kid couldn't have the seat, but the failed to explain the actual reason and the dumb flight attendant threaten that parents with jail and foster care for their kid. And then she got all uppity and told them they all had to leave rather than letting the infant sit in one of the parent's laps.

Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21764 posts
Posted on 5/4/17 at 9:13 am to
Let me help you out here

LINK

quote:

LOS ANGELES (KABC) -- A Southern California family says they were kicked off an overbooked Delta airplane because they refused to yield a seat held by their young son.

The Schear family of Huntington Beach says they were flying from Hawaii to Los Angeles last week when airline staff asked them to give up a seat occupied by their 2-year-old son and carry him on their laps for the duration of the flight.


They tried to refuse and argued with airline staff, but say they were threatened with being sent to jail.

"You have to give up the seat or you're going to jail, your wife is going to jail and they'll take your kids from you," Brian Schear recalled the airline staff telling him.

Despite feeling they were in the right, that threat was terrifying, said Brian's wife, Brittany Schear.

"As a mother, you have a 1-year-old and a 2-year-old - it doesn't matter whether that's true or false. It put fear in me," she said.

They filmed the encounter with airport staff and posted it on YouTube.

Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 5/4/17 at 9:15 am to
quote:

Delta was right in that the kid couldn't have the seat


Why? They bought the seat.

The parents aren't suing or anything. They had to get off and pay $2,000 for a different flight. Total bullshite.
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
131503 posts
Posted on 5/4/17 at 9:16 am to
They bought the seat for a different kid.

You cant switch around like that

The parents were wrong

But the dumb ¢unt stewardess was more wrong
Posted by Scooba
Member since Jun 2013
20014 posts
Posted on 5/4/17 at 9:17 am to
quote:

"You have to give up the seat or you're going to jail, your wife is going to jail and they'll take your kids from you,"


Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 5/4/17 at 9:17 am to
quote:

They bought the seat for a different kid.

You cant switch around like that



Why?
Posted by Duckie
Tippy Toe, Louisiana
Member since Apr 2010
24314 posts
Posted on 5/4/17 at 9:18 am to
quote:

Why? They bought the seat.


because they bought the seat for another child and rather than pay the fees associated with changing the name on the reservation he just let his other child sit in the seat. I guess it is FAA regulation that the name on the reservation must sit in that seat.

She was doing her job, but it could have been handled much, much better.

A good employee/attendant would have asked the father to come to the front of the plane, explained she thinks the rule is silly, escorted him to the desk and changed the name free of charge (if possible at that point).

Some people just can't see the forest for the trees.
This post was edited on 5/4/17 at 9:22 am
Posted by Thib-a-doe Tiger
Member since Nov 2012
36754 posts
Posted on 5/4/17 at 9:18 am to
Somebody about to fly free on Delta for the rest of their lives
Posted by LouisianaLady
Member since Mar 2009
83020 posts
Posted on 5/4/17 at 9:18 am to
quote:

They bought the seat for a different kid.

You cant switch around like that

The parents were wrong


This is true, but why not just say that's the baby's name? It isn't like babies have photo ID (In seriousness, you put your DOB when you book flights, so I know this wouldn't work either)

quote:

But the dumb ¢unt stewardess was more wrong



For sure. Telling someone their kid is going to foster care is guaranteed to fuel the fire more. What an idiot.
This post was edited on 5/4/17 at 9:20 am
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
73548 posts
Posted on 5/4/17 at 9:19 am to
What flying use to be...



What flying is now...
Posted by FearTheFish
Member since Dec 2007
4461 posts
Posted on 5/4/17 at 9:19 am to
As someone who is sitting in DFW right now, I have no sympathy or faith in the human race.
Posted by tylercsbn9
Cypress, TX
Member since Feb 2004
66973 posts
Posted on 5/4/17 at 9:19 am to
quote:

Why? They bought the seat.


Because the seat they bought was for another one of their kids who they got on an earlier flight. The names didn't match.

Which is a fine rule I guess, but Delta failed miserably in explaining that.


You'd think airlines would be telling their people to do a little bit better with recent events.
This post was edited on 5/4/17 at 9:21 am
Posted by Adam4848
LA
Member since Apr 2006
19779 posts
Posted on 5/4/17 at 9:20 am to
They'll get a nice little settlement from Delta and be on their way.
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
71016 posts
Posted on 5/4/17 at 9:20 am to
This thread should be fun. Delta is held in such high regards on this board for whatever ignorant reasons.
Posted by NYNolaguy1
Member since May 2011
21764 posts
Posted on 5/4/17 at 9:21 am to
In all honesty if I had a kid I would want to have them in a car seat on a plane, especially if I bought said seat.

It's not right for an airline to dictate how a kid flies, much less try and boot them off. I have a hard time believing there weren't other passengers on the flight that could have been bought off. Why go after a family?
Posted by Dorothy
Munchkinland
Member since Oct 2008
18154 posts
Posted on 5/4/17 at 9:21 am to
quote:

Why? They bought the seat.


Because the ticket/seat purchased was under a different kid's name (older child took a different flight home), and they didn't transfer it to the younger kid's name.

quote:

Schear says he originally bought the seat for his 18-year-old son Mason, but then decided to send him home on an earlier flight so that he could use the seat for his younger child, Grayson, who was placed in a car seat.

The airline staff tells him they need the seat because the flight is overbooked and the original passenger whose name was on the seat isn't using it.


But this is bullshite:

quote:

One airline employee tells him that under FAA regulations, 2-year-old children are not supposed to have their own seats at all and are supposed to sit in parents' laps for the duration of the flight.

"With him being two, he cannot sit in the car seat," one airline employee tells him. "He has to sit in your arms the whole time."


Yes, the kid CAN sit in a carseat if the ticket purchased is in his name.
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 5/4/17 at 9:22 am to
quote:

Because the seat they bought was for another one of their kids who they got on an earlier flight. The names didn't match.



They explained this to the employees at the gate and they said it was fine and let them board anyway.

Then once they were seated, came on and told them it was no longer fine.

Again...its a dumb fricking rule. They bought it, why can't they just change the name on it instead of kicking them out of the seat?

Posted by Hangover Haven
Metry
Member since Oct 2013
33554 posts
Posted on 5/4/17 at 9:23 am to
Southwest...AKA Cattle Call Airlines....
Posted by Floating Change Up
Member since Dec 2013
13022 posts
Posted on 5/4/17 at 9:23 am to
quote:

but the failed to explain the actual reason


It's almost like you didn't watch the video. The delta employee clearly states that since his son isn't there then the seat was not the fathers to give to someone else. The dad thinks just because he paid for the seat he can put any person in it he wants. That is not how it works.

That said, there were two other dumbass things presented in the video: the delta employee talking about him losing their kids... And a grown arse man wearing a fricking flatbill cap - he loses his argument just on that fact alone.
Posted by tylercsbn9
Cypress, TX
Member since Feb 2004
66973 posts
Posted on 5/4/17 at 9:23 am to
quote:

A good employee/attendant would have asked the father to come to the front of the plane, explained she thinks the rule is silly, escorted him to the desk and changed the name free of charge (if possible at that point).



The father even gave up towards then end and said they'd have the kid in their laps, but the FA decided to be vindictive.
Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram