
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Cruise Liner, American Heritage, sinking near GNO
Posted on 11/13/26 at 4:38 pm to UncleRuckus
Posted on 11/13/26 at 4:38 pm to UncleRuckus
People in the water are at risk, but anybody stuck on below deck spaces, especially on the side facing down is in a really dangerous situation. Galley and engineering spaces probably had to swim out or get stuck below. Damn!
Posted on 11/13/26 at 4:40 pm to MrLSU
Thanks for filming me nearly lose my life to this shite, but do you mind putting your phone down and helping me?
Posted on 11/13/26 at 4:40 pm to Shexter
But it wasn't Algiers Point (which was my and my husband's first guess) as we had lived there and heard more than a couple five horns followed by crushing barges.
This was up river just upstream from the GNO bridges. HTH did they not have tugs controlling the lost-power ship?
This was up river just upstream from the GNO bridges. HTH did they not have tugs controlling the lost-power ship?
Posted on 11/13/26 at 4:41 pm to TDFreak
quote:
That foreign flagged tanker would not have been here if the US didn’t waive the Jones Act because of the Iran war.
Not so. If reporting is correct,
quote:
the tanker was empty and was traveling upriver to load cargo in Garyville at the time of the crash before departing for Singapore.
LINK
Jones Act restrictions would not apply to an international voyage. And an empty vessel headed for pickup enroute to Asia would not be coastwise trade.
This post was edited on 11/13/26 at 4:52 pm
Posted on 11/13/26 at 4:42 pm to DownshiftAndFloorIt
quote:
Its amazing that nobody got trapped below decks.
I know. Egress for those on the port side went vertical quickly.
Posted on 11/13/26 at 4:43 pm to hg
quote:
do you mind putting your phone down and helping me?
But if I do that , how will I "own the internet" today?
Posted on 11/13/26 at 4:44 pm to nealnan8
That mayor of New Orleans has a legit five head.
Didn’t remember her having that.
Didn’t remember her having that.
Posted on 11/13/26 at 4:45 pm to SWLA92
Thank you Jesus.
We took a riverboat cruise with our kids .. one was “stroller age” as an infant and the others were 3 and 8. I was sort of a nervous wreck with the fear that this could happen. Not likely but still an irrational mom fear.
We took a riverboat cruise with our kids .. one was “stroller age” as an infant and the others were 3 and 8. I was sort of a nervous wreck with the fear that this could happen. Not likely but still an irrational mom fear.
Posted on 11/13/26 at 4:47 pm to TDsngumbo
quote:
The only person on this entire site that gives my posts attention outside of some upvotes or downvotes here and there is you.
Not true. I make a sincere effort to misquote you and misattribute quotes TO you.
This post was edited on 11/13/26 at 4:58 pm
Posted on 11/13/26 at 4:47 pm to MrLSU
Damn! That’s a lot of people in the water. Thank God the current was slack.
Posted on 11/13/26 at 4:48 pm to JudgeHolden
Maritime baws: What’s the over/under on what time the limitation is filed?
Posted on 11/13/26 at 4:53 pm to JudgeHolden
Agreed. Jones Act ain't go nothing to do with the situation here with respect to the tanker.
Jones Act comes into play for crew of the US flagged American Heritage with respect to any PI claims they may have against their employer.
Jones Act comes into play for crew of the US flagged American Heritage with respect to any PI claims they may have against their employer.
Posted on 11/13/26 at 4:55 pm to Stat M Repairman
quote:
Jones Act comes into play for crew of the US flagged American Heritage with respect to any PI claims they may have against their employer.
Yep. But hard to see how the moored vessel could be at fault.
I guess they could argue inadequate emergency procedures or equipment. But everyone got out, and mostly unharmed.
Posted on 11/13/26 at 4:58 pm to TDsngumbo
quote:
thought reports earlier said he mentioned that everyone made it off ok? Did I misread that?
I don't know why somebody would say that because there's no way everybody on that side of the boat made it off. That tanker rammed somebody right in the face too it's not like it was a bump from behind. There's absolutely casualties
Posted on 11/13/26 at 5:01 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
But hard to see how the moored vessel could be at fault.
Can if it's in New Orleans.
Burden is very low. Also covers negligence of officers or other crew members. Also on the theory of unseaworthiness of the vessel itself.
People in NOLA the best in the world when it comes to these types of cases. If it can be done, they'll do it. And they probably will in this case.
Posted on 11/13/26 at 5:02 pm to Corso
quote:
I don't know why somebody would say that because there's no way everybody on that side of the boat made it off. That tanker rammed somebody right in the face too it's not like it was a bump from behind. There's absolutely casualties
The cruise ship was moored and passengers were already in the process of disembarking from the upper deck.
Posted on 11/13/26 at 5:02 pm to Stat M Repairman
quote:
People in NOLA the best in the world when it comes to these types of cases. If it can be done, they'll do it. And they probably will in this case
Fine print in the contract likely says they are entitled to go swimming on the boat which this contract would have fulfilled.
Posted on 11/13/26 at 5:05 pm to SWLA92
If true they all got off and only non-critical injuries that's a miracle.
This post was edited on 11/13/26 at 5:07 pm
Posted on 11/13/26 at 5:05 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
Maritime baws: What’s the over/under on what time the limitation is filed?
Before midnight?
Posted on 11/13/26 at 5:08 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
But hard to see how the moored vessel could be at fault.
In an allision, there is a presumption of fault on the moving vessel. The fault will be entirely on the moving vessel, which is also unseaworthy.

Popular
Back to top


1







