- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) ***W.H.O. DECLARES A GLOBAL PANDEMIC***
Posted on 1/28/20 at 9:47 am to Lsut81
Posted on 1/28/20 at 9:47 am to Lsut81
quote:
As soon as I saw the trainer was a female, I suspected that they were banging...
I’m more concerned about the bus driver in Japan and how he got it, if it’s supposed to be transferred by droplets.
I saw yesterday a Chinese health official say it can transmitted via physical contact as well.
quote:
@PDChina
Novel #coronavirus can be transmitted by touch, China’s medical authority reiterated on Tue. The incubation period of novel #coronavirus is usually 3-7 days. Young children and infants could also be infected.
This post was edited on 1/28/20 at 9:49 am
Posted on 1/28/20 at 9:48 am to Poker_hog
Okay.
Gimmie where they are giving better “information” then.
Not sure how can you get better info on the lethality and infectivity off of 8 cases regardless of how open you are but I’m prepared to be surprised.
And I believe I’ve said multiple times there was and is internal suppression. Compared to what they did with SARS? This is crystal clear transparency.
And if you can’t see that....
Still want that open and transparent HK information. I’m even being kind enough to ignore the presumption that HK is fundamentally distinct from China what with all of the crap that has been happening the past six months, with dissidents getting “suicided”
Gimmie where they are giving better “information” then.
Not sure how can you get better info on the lethality and infectivity off of 8 cases regardless of how open you are but I’m prepared to be surprised.
And I believe I’ve said multiple times there was and is internal suppression. Compared to what they did with SARS? This is crystal clear transparency.
And if you can’t see that....
Still want that open and transparent HK information. I’m even being kind enough to ignore the presumption that HK is fundamentally distinct from China what with all of the crap that has been happening the past six months, with dissidents getting “suicided”
Posted on 1/28/20 at 9:58 am to Burhead
The symptoms still sore throat, fever, coughing?
Posted on 1/28/20 at 10:13 am to ecb
quote:
TDsngumbo,
Where do I get that t shirt?
It's not for sale. I hadn't planned on selling it but I've been getting a fair amount of questions/comments on it lately so who knows, I may try to sell it if I can make sure I won't get sued by LSU for any copyright infringement.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 10:26 am to TDsngumbo
How has this not gotten pinned to top of page yet?
Posted on 1/28/20 at 10:37 am to Boat Motor Bandit
Probably because it's not affecting America in the numbers it's affecting China. It's still a "sit back and monitor" type situation here in America.
Also, just saw that China rejected the CDC's offer to send a team to help.
Also, just saw that China rejected the CDC's offer to send a team to help.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 10:38 am to TDsngumbo
quote:
Also, just saw that China rejected the CDC's offer to send a team to help.
Don’t want people playing in their sandbox and finding out just what they knew and when...
Posted on 1/28/20 at 10:47 am to Volvagia
Posted on 1/28/20 at 10:51 am to Lsut81
quote:
Don’t want people playing in their sandbox and finding out just what they knew and when...
Still a bad look for China when they refused help to save face at the expense of their citizens.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 10:55 am to Poker_hog
That entire press conference was discussing the entire outbreak, using data from Wuhan.
Wait, you thought that was based on just the HK cases?
It hasn’t even been in HK long enough for them to know what it is going to do. It’s R-naught is close to zero based on that, as I believe contact tracing of all HK cases up to now goes through Wuhan.
Wait, you thought that was based on just the HK cases?
It hasn’t even been in HK long enough for them to know what it is going to do. It’s R-naught is close to zero based on that, as I believe contact tracing of all HK cases up to now goes through Wuhan.
This post was edited on 1/28/20 at 10:59 am
Posted on 1/28/20 at 10:59 am to Volvagia
quote:
Wait, you thought that was based on just the HK cases?
Nope and didn’t say that either. Keep twisting what I said.
I’m still waiting on a press conference from ole upfront China with better info.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 11:03 am to Poker_hog
Just checking in. This is still statistically less lethal than the common flu, yes? Still just old people, young people, and already compromised people dieing?
Posted on 1/28/20 at 11:05 am to Volvagia
"GOD THE STONEWALLING"
Good point for those who haven't read other virus papers. That level of detail appears in every virus technical paper, even those that are about plant viruses. Without that, there can be no validity to replicable results.
There is a second Lancet paper from 1 December about a virus in China.
Lancet is a major publication and I can only imagine the care they took to get this out quickly and with pinpoint accuracy
Good point for those who haven't read other virus papers. That level of detail appears in every virus technical paper, even those that are about plant viruses. Without that, there can be no validity to replicable results.
There is a second Lancet paper from 1 December about a virus in China.
Lancet is a major publication and I can only imagine the care they took to get this out quickly and with pinpoint accuracy
Posted on 1/28/20 at 11:05 am to Poker_hog
Your earlier quote:
You certainly implied it. That Hong Kong’s exposure to 8 cases was giving them more data that they were sharing than the tens of thousands elsewhere. Not sure how else to interpret that statement.
So now your argument is what, exactly then?
We are getting good data from Chinese scientists, reported from within China, but China is stonewalling because it didn’t come from the ministry of propaganda?
K.
quote:
There’s better information coming out of Hong Kong that has 8 cases than China that undoubtedly has 10s of thousands of cases.
You certainly implied it. That Hong Kong’s exposure to 8 cases was giving them more data that they were sharing than the tens of thousands elsewhere. Not sure how else to interpret that statement.
So now your argument is what, exactly then?
We are getting good data from Chinese scientists, reported from within China, but China is stonewalling because it didn’t come from the ministry of propaganda?
K.
This post was edited on 1/28/20 at 11:08 am
Posted on 1/28/20 at 11:07 am to TDsngumbo
quote:they might be using CDC's impeccable record in dealing with adult obesity, childhood obesity and opioid use... as a deterrent
Also, just saw that China rejected the CDC's offer to send a team to help.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 11:08 am to TigerFanatic99
HHS just did a presser
LINK
Some cliffs:
They mention a possible vaccine candidate, but that would take 3 months to get into testing and then another 3 months to roll out, that's assuming it's the right one.
They can't confirm asymptomatic transmission because China hasn't shared that with them yet.
Screenings increasing to 20 airports now.
LINK
Some cliffs:
They mention a possible vaccine candidate, but that would take 3 months to get into testing and then another 3 months to roll out, that's assuming it's the right one.
They can't confirm asymptomatic transmission because China hasn't shared that with them yet.
Screenings increasing to 20 airports now.
This post was edited on 1/28/20 at 11:13 am
Posted on 1/28/20 at 11:10 am to Volvagia
quote:
It hasn’t even been in HK long enough for them to know what it is going to do.
Hopefully nothing, bc that’s where I would have got it
Although was in two other locations with cases, but on 1-2 cases in those places.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 11:11 am to GeauxTigers2020
quote:
Screenings increasing to 20 airports now.
Too little, too late
The cats already out of the bag here. Should have started screening end of last week before people fled China for CNY.
Posted on 1/28/20 at 11:15 am to Volvagia
quote:
So now your argument is what, exactly then?
The data hk used was from within and outside China. They concluded China has vastly underestimated total number of cases.
Just giving you a “shred of evidence” that China has not been completely upfront.
Popular
Back to top


2





