Started By
Message

re: Cornell University Situation Is Going To Turn Into Another Duke Lacrosse Case Isn't It?

Posted on 10/1/26 at 11:47 am to
Posted by tylercsbn9
Cypress, TX
Member since Feb 2004
67594 posts
Posted on 10/1/26 at 11:47 am to
quote:

Well, in the lawsuit, she is most definitely not saying that she consented to every single sexual activity.



So?

I'd say her initial statements hold more weight than what she is trying to say later for a lawsuit in order to get paid. Initially she probably told the actual truth because she got it in her mind that what the boys did was rape (to cover for her poor decisions) when by law it turns out it wasn't. So for the lawsuit she has to then backtrack to make it rape.

She participated in whore activities and was cool with it until she told her friends and they judged her for it. Then she got rejected by the frat house. So only then she went to the cops to report and based on what she told them it was pretty clear no rape happened. But she couldn't accept that because it hurt her reputation so she had to continue with the charade and also change her story to help with the lawsuit.
This post was edited on 10/1/26 at 11:59 am
Posted by QJenk
Atl, Ga
Member since Jan 2013
18027 posts
Posted on 10/1/26 at 11:53 am to
quote:

Because she's lying whore relying on dipshits like you to not take her to task.


Honest question: Are you open at all to your current position being wrong?
Posted by LSUfan4444
Member since Mar 2004
57597 posts
Posted on 10/1/26 at 11:56 am to
quote:

You can't say that without knowing what actually happened.


You absolutely can. Even if you just look at the statement from 2024 you can tell these kids are assholes and that it never should have went as far as it did. It doesnt make it illegal but it does make them assholes.

You don't need to know legal specifics to know what occurred there went too far and should have been stopped and prevented from one or more of those young men.

Even if the Jane never dissented one or more of them should have protected her from herself and his brothers.

The thing is, you know that. You're just trying to be an know it all a-hole.

If you want to take it from the Bible, it says men present the role as protectors through principles of servant leadership, sacrifice, and caring for the vulnerable.

If you want to take it from the modern ethics of guardianship, he code of a protector s a set of unwritten principles focused on using strength, influence, and capability to safeguard others from harm from outside people and factors AND themselves.

A code of protection is foundational to almost every thriving society in human history whether it be chilvary (in europe), bushido in asia, native american warrior ethics and selfless service prevents and reduces internal chaos and predatory behavior.

They may not be criminals but they are weak, spineless assholes. As young men, they have a responsibility to themselves, their brothers and those incapable of protecting themselves from situations like this.

And you know it. Thats the worst part of you arguing against it. It's sad that you'll compromise your own character for a social media argument. Shouldn't[t be a suprise at this point though but I admit, I overestimated you.
This post was edited on 10/1/26 at 12:22 pm
Posted by Tiger1242
Member since Jul 2011
33475 posts
Posted on 10/1/26 at 11:58 am to
quote:

In this case, she is suing them. It is a legal matter

You know civil cases and criminal cases are different things right? For example OJ lost his civil case but won his criminal case.

And regardless, I’m not just talking about the legality, I’m saying the people outraged online have a reason to be so.
Posted by QJenk
Atl, Ga
Member since Jan 2013
18027 posts
Posted on 10/1/26 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

I'd say her initial statements hold more weight than what she is trying to say later for a lawsuit in order to get paid. Initially she probably told the actual truth because she got it in her mind that what the boys did was rape (to cover for her poor decisions) when by law it turns out it wasn't. So for the lawsuit she has to then backtrack to make it rape.


I do concede that that is a possible scenario. But to add on as another potential, what if it took time for her to process what actually happened and that she was indeed actually victimized? As the OP stated, there are times where women have been beat, but they still go back to their abusers, cover up for them, even going as far as to attack those trying to help them. Does this mean she was never abused?
Victims do not always immediately know that they are victims. I don't completely understand the logic either. It's not something I have personally experienced, and I never will. But it is the experience for some others.

I'm not saying with certainty that I know this is 100% what happened. But at the same time, it is not unheard of or a completely possibility either.
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
37101 posts
Posted on 10/1/26 at 12:17 pm to
That's understandable but she either lied to the police or in the suit. It's also understandable that rational people wouldn't take her for her word.
Posted by _Hurricane_
Somewhere
Member since Feb 2016
7972 posts
Posted on 10/1/26 at 12:22 pm to
quote:

But to add on as another potential, what if it took time for her to process what actually happened and that she was indeed actually victimized?



Or what if she got slut shamed, had a roommate in her ear telling it was actually rape and not her fault, and then got pissed because she got disinvited from a Halloween party she desperately wanted to attend at the house where she was “raped”?

Oh it was actually just her processing!!! Frick off with this modern therapy “processing” BS. The only processing she did was deciding that this was a way to flip the script from drug whore to martyr.
Posted by lionward2014
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2015
14799 posts
Posted on 10/1/26 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

what if it took time for her to process what actually happened and that she was indeed actually victimized?


I'll acknowledge your point, and say even if we give no weight to the legal conclusion she drew about the situation in the text message the next day or what she told the police initially about that she wasn't raped, it doesn't negate the factual statements she made to them. Changing the facts 2 years later in a civil suit is inherently suspicious.
Posted by nolaks
Member since Dec 2013
1367 posts
Posted on 10/1/26 at 12:24 pm to
I had a roomate in college who had a 1600 on SAT. That was the dumbest person I associated with freshman year.
Posted by QJenk
Atl, Ga
Member since Jan 2013
18027 posts
Posted on 10/1/26 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

You don't need to know legal specifics to know what occurred there went too far and should have been stopped and prevented from one or more of those young men.

Even if the Jane never dissented one or more of them should have protected her from herself and his brothers.


I'm in complete agreement with everything you said. To add on, as it's been referenced in this thread. One of the guys texted her the next day apologizing for how things went down, and that he felt terrible for not shutting thing down and not kicking anyone out because they went too far.

At a minimum, how does that not sound like assholes?
Posted by QJenk
Atl, Ga
Member since Jan 2013
18027 posts
Posted on 10/1/26 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

Oh it was actually just her processing!!! Frick off with this modern therapy “processing” BS. The only processing she did was deciding that this was a way to flip the script from drug whore to martyr.


Are you open at all to your current position being wrong?
Posted by Sam Quint
Member since Sep 2022
10019 posts
Posted on 10/1/26 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

Are you open at all to your current position being wrong?

do you understand that 100% of the posters here would be the first to string these dudes up by their nutsacks if they were proven guilty?
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
20263 posts
Posted on 10/1/26 at 12:31 pm to
Are you open to helping her carry a mattress around campus?
Posted by QJenk
Atl, Ga
Member since Jan 2013
18027 posts
Posted on 10/1/26 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

do you understand that 100% of the posters here would be the first to string these dudes up by their nutsacks if they were proven guilty?


I understand and admire your optimism. But I do not agree on that 100% number. Some people will refuse to admit they are wrong, no matter what.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
89711 posts
Posted on 10/1/26 at 12:56 pm to
quote:

Honest question: Are you open at all to your current position being wrong?


Must have been a lot of new developments since you were leaving this thread just a few posts ago

To answer your question, of course. But I didn't just form my opinion arbitrarily.
Posted by CR4090
Member since Apr 2023
11081 posts
Posted on 10/1/26 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

she went to the police because after she told her friend she was embarrassed.


I feel like we have heard this story before.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
133239 posts
Posted on 10/1/26 at 1:26 pm to
quote:

You know civil cases and criminal cases are different things right?


Posted by Interweb Cowboy
NW Bama
Member since Dec 2010
3198 posts
Posted on 10/1/26 at 1:40 pm to
Just listened to the Megan Kelly podcast on this and it sounds like the guys are in the clear leagally.
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
37101 posts
Posted on 10/1/26 at 2:21 pm to
quote:

Are you open at all to your current position being wrong?


Based on the known facts? That would be extremely difficult. How about you?
Posted by Crowknowsbest
Member since May 2012
27157 posts
Posted on 10/1/26 at 2:21 pm to
Yeah, the dudes involved are sketchy shitheads, best case.

I just wouldn’t lump the kids who didn’t respond to the messages into the same category. There are a thousand reasons why people wouldn’t have seen or responded to the exchange in real time.
Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10 ... 26
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 26Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram