- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Corn Lobby already whining about Costs changing to Pure Sugar vs HFCS.
Posted on 7/18/25 at 9:46 am to Odysseus32
Posted on 7/18/25 at 9:46 am to Odysseus32
quote:
Corn/Sugarcane industries aside, I don't understand why people consider this a win.
Corn or sugarcane, a can of coke is still going to contain wayyyyy too much sugar for there to be any difference in terms of health.
from a health standpont....imo it doesnt matter
it is a win for the environment, its a win for pricing of all other foods because corn is one of the main feed stocks for cattle and if they get it out of fuel...its a huge win for everyone as ethanol fuel is overall terrible on vehicles
Posted on 7/18/25 at 9:47 am to dkreller
quote:
It tastes infinitely better.
Okay, let's say that's true.
Wasn't the whole thing about RFK and getting things like HFCS and dyes out of food supposed to be in the name of health? Wasn't it make America healthy again?
Posted on 7/18/25 at 9:49 am to Odysseus32
quote:
Wasn't the whole thing about RFK and getting things like HFCS and dyes out of food supposed to be in the name of health? Wasn't it make America healthy again?
We don’t need daddy government to ban cokes, we just need everyone to be honest about what they do to your health.
We’ve pretty well done that with cigarettes. Yes, there is a sin tax on them, but the marketing demonization had a WAY bigger effect on curbing smoking
Posted on 7/18/25 at 9:49 am to Crappieman
quote:
Farm sugar cane or sugar beets you idiots. Adapt to changing markets like real businesses do or die.
I think they get higher yields with corn where they grow it.
Posted on 7/18/25 at 9:51 am to beerJeep
quote:
I don’t think you’re going to have much sugarcane growing up in Iowa
Nor rice. However, if we eliminate all farm subsidies, including the ethanol BS there may be a massive correction in land prices.
Maybe an acre in Iowa will drop below $10k.
Posted on 7/18/25 at 9:54 am to Crappieman
Anybody ever think about how different several federal laws and policies might be if Iowa wasn't one of the first states to hold a primary election?
(Yes, I know it's a caucus.)
(Yes, I know it's a caucus.)
Posted on 7/18/25 at 9:54 am to Crappieman
Healthier food is great and all, but I think a side effect will be Bill Gates and the Chinese buying up even more farmland for solar and wind energy.
Posted on 7/18/25 at 9:56 am to stout
quote:
Take it out of our gas too
Posted on 7/18/25 at 9:56 am to Jcorye1
quote:
Would love to see ex-politicians banned from any sort of lobbying and strict rules put in place under the treason code/laws.
This
These people are scum
Posted on 7/18/25 at 9:56 am to LarryCLE
quote:
Chinese buying
Not anymore
Posted on 7/18/25 at 9:56 am to TankBoys32
quote:
Is sugarcane grown north of Louisiana? I guess they could do the sugar beets
Sugar beets were once produced in the Texas panhandle and I know of a large processing facility that has been dormant for years. They are quite water intensive so that is a problem for areas that rely heavily on irrigation. Last time I looked, more sugar is produced from sugar beets than sugarcane in the US.
Posted on 7/18/25 at 9:57 am to Crappieman
We're currently burning fricktons of corn for fuel and exporting fricktons overseas. Corn farmers aren't hurting for markets for their product and I say this as someone whose family is firmly rooted in corn farming.
Posted on 7/18/25 at 10:00 am to dkreller
quote:
now they know how the sugarcane farmers felt.
Right.
Sugarcane fellas must have a weak lobby.
Posted on 7/18/25 at 10:02 am to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:
Maybe an acre in Iowa will drop below $10k.
Farmers frickkkkkked
Hunting leases STACKKKKKED
Posted on 7/18/25 at 10:05 am to Crappieman
Get rid of hfcs and daylight saving
Neither are necessary and both are because of farmers
Neither are necessary and both are because of farmers
Posted on 7/18/25 at 10:07 am to brass2mouth
quote:
Sugarcane fellas must have a weak lobby.
They are the ones that begged for the price floor to be put in, which created the demand for HFCS in the first place.
Posted on 7/18/25 at 10:08 am to Crappieman
Most of the corn farmed in the US is based off an artificially propped up market decades in the making
I don't hate farmers but the entire US food economy is unreasonably based on corn and it's making everyone fatter and unhealthier. Plus the gas.
I don't hate farmers but the entire US food economy is unreasonably based on corn and it's making everyone fatter and unhealthier. Plus the gas.
Posted on 7/18/25 at 10:09 am to Crappieman
You can't just farm sugar cane anywhere. But all in all we don't need to use high fructose corn syrup anyway.
Posted on 7/18/25 at 10:12 am to ThermoDynamicTiger
Corn is not even efficient at making biofuels. Switchgrass for example makes way more biofuel per acre and takes a lot less inputs to grow. Corn is a heavy feeder and strips the ground of nutrients.
Back to top



0










