Started By
Message

re: Colorado: If you don’t disclose job opening expected salary…..

Posted on 6/18/21 at 11:53 am to
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
263209 posts
Posted on 6/18/21 at 11:53 am to
quote:

The government shouldn't be setting the terms for how two private parties operate.


Fact.

Incapable people need the government to act on their behalf. The rest of us can negotiate on our own.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162291 posts
Posted on 6/18/21 at 11:53 am to
quote:



Entitlement.

There are ways around it.

1) Tell them you want to know salary range before interviewing.

2) Only apply to jobs that list your acceptable price range.


Solves your problem.


Most jobs don't post a salary range

So it is in fact a waste of everyone's time
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
263209 posts
Posted on 6/18/21 at 11:55 am to
quote:

Most jobs don't post a salary range


I have never applied to a job that didn't have a range listed, or didn't disclose prior to interview. Not one time. If you're good enough for them to talk to, get your information prior.

This post was edited on 6/18/21 at 11:56 am
Posted by SammyTiger
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2009
67661 posts
Posted on 6/18/21 at 11:56 am to
quote:

Entitlement.

There are ways around it.

1) Tell them you want to know salary range before interviewing.


I love How you fluctuate between calling people entitled and demanding people know their worth.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
263209 posts
Posted on 6/18/21 at 11:58 am to
quote:

I love How you fluctuate between calling people entitled and demanding people know their worth.


Entitled people don't know their worth. They always think they deserve more than they do.

Entitled people think because something inconveniences them, the government has to pass a law
Posted by Cowboyfan89
Member since Sep 2015
12747 posts
Posted on 6/18/21 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

Are you hiring them both for the same exact position, while expecting the same results from them?

Obviously the position is the same, but why would you expect the same results from the less experienced applicant as the more experienced applicant?

If I'm the one hiring for that position, then I want someone with more experience than the minimum, but the minimum is only there to weed out unqualified, less experienced individuals. It doesn't mean I'm willing to pay someone with the minimum experience the same as someone with twice the minimum.

At my old company, my position had 3 different levels. They advertised for those positions under a generic job title, not "Job A, Level 1". When I was hired, I had very little experience in the field, so I was hired as a Level 1. A year later, after I had been promoted to a Level 2, we advertised for another member of the team. We got some applicants like I was when I started--little experience. We also got a guy that had been doing the work for a while, and had a few years experience. We hired him as a Level 2, with full expectations that we weren't going to have to train him and could expect him to handle more complex job responsibilities than a Level 1.

Same thing goes with that position. It may technically be the same job no matter who is hired, but the guy with more experience could be expected to be able to handle alot more situations than someone with less experience.

Just because job duties are the same doesn't mean someone with less experience can handle every situation the same way as someone with more experience.

If you need any proof of why that doesn't work, look at the federal government. Two people can be at the same grade level, making the same pay, when one clearly has more experience and outperforms the other. But because of the federal payscale, both are paid the same amount.

The private sector should not be set up the same way. You want the best, you should pay for it. You should get what you pay for.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
73729 posts
Posted on 6/18/21 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

This take really gives some insight into how some view the employment relationship.


I don't expect a company I am applying at to be on my side when negotiating money.
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
32929 posts
Posted on 6/18/21 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

If you need any proof of why that doesn't work, look at the federal government. Two people can be at the same grade level, making the same pay, when one clearly has more experience and outperforms the other. But because of the federal payscale, both are paid the same amount.

The private sector should not be set up the same way. You want the best, you should pay for it. You should get what you pay for.


I don’t think anyone here is saying that it should work that way. For the position that I mentioned earlier there was a pay band from 85k-115k, if you want to hire two analysts for that position and one is more experienced than the other, hire one at 100k and one at 85k. I don’t see how this law stops that
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162291 posts
Posted on 6/18/21 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

I have never applied to a job that didn't have a range listed, or didn't disclose prior to interview. Not one time.

Since you're the only person on the planet, your observations actually mean everything

Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
263209 posts
Posted on 6/18/21 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

. I don’t see how this law stops that


Youre still forcing private parties to disclose information that they may not want to disclose. Sounds very nanny like.

This may also limit your starting pay.

Employers have enough HR bullshite to work through. They don't need more.
This post was edited on 6/18/21 at 12:20 pm
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
20634 posts
Posted on 6/18/21 at 12:22 pm to
In my experience a vast majority of jobs that don't list a Salary range are either low paying or suck. If you pay well or are a great place to work, why would you not list it? I don't see any reason for an employer not to list it? As an employer, I list it. The last thing I want is to interview someone that thinks they are a hot shot and the pay not be enough, and waste everyone's time.

But furthermore, you may be a smaller company or other wise pay very well. Or maybe someone great thought they made a lot and don't, just listing the pay may entice someone over. If the pay is not listed, how are they supposed to know if they can make more or not?

I just have never understood not listing some sort of pay. Its very easy to clearly state in an interview that the top pay range is only for X-years of experience or whatever.
Posted by calcotron
Member since Nov 2007
8337 posts
Posted on 6/18/21 at 12:24 pm to
High paying jobs will not list it most of the time.

Ranges is the answer. 50k-100k depending on specific skills and experience. Problem solved.
Posted by Cowboyfan89
Member since Sep 2015
12747 posts
Posted on 6/18/21 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

I don’t think anyone here is saying that it should work that way.

Really? Because Kujo sure seems like he is. Then again, maybe he just uses terrible comparisons.
quote:

For the position that I mentioned earlier there was a pay band from 85k-115k, if you want to hire two analysts for that position and one is more experienced than the other, hire one at 100k and one at 85k. I don’t see how this law stops that

Who's to say they wouldn't have hired at that in the first place?

The only reason I keep seeing for this being a good thing is now people don't have to waste their time applying for jobs that they think they are above.

I don't know what kind of job descriptions people are reading, but I can generally get a good feel for whether or not I think a position is going to pay what I think I'm worth.

If I have 25 year experience as a CEO, I'm probably going to temper my salary expectations if I apply for a position that only requires 5 years of experience in a senior management position.

Actually, I'm probably not going to apply for it at all if money is an issue.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
263209 posts
Posted on 6/18/21 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

In my experience a vast majority of jobs that don't list a Salary range are either low paying or suck.


Yep.

The answer to the problem is simple, don't apply for companies who do not list wage requirements if you dislike it, and stop asking the government to force them to.
Posted by Kujo
225-911-5736
Member since Dec 2015
6015 posts
Posted on 6/18/21 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

Entitlement.

There are ways around it.

1) Tell them you want to know salary range before interviewing.

2) Only apply to jobs that list your acceptable price range.


Solves your problem.



It's like if a dating app doesn't include location.

I have to reach out to every freaking girl and ask so how far do you live away from me?


Sure I can only respond to chicks who state location as part of their Bio, but I don't get why they wouldn't post it if it's such a material part of the selection process.

It's operationally inefficient. The end.


"Well the right guy would ask and be willing to move for me"...free market
This post was edited on 6/18/21 at 12:40 pm
Posted by Cowboyfan89
Member since Sep 2015
12747 posts
Posted on 6/18/21 at 12:42 pm to
quote:

Kujo

quote:

It's like if a dating app doesn't include location.

I have to reach out to every freaking girl and ask so how far do you live away from me?


Sure I can only respond to chicks who stare location as part of their Bio, but I don't get why they wouldn't post it if it's such a material part of the selection process.

Another analogy that makes no sense. If a Victoria's Secret model is on a dating app and we connect (or whatever the hell you do on those things), I don't care if I have to reach out to her, I'm doing it. It doesn't matter if there is another woman on there that's just down the road.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
73729 posts
Posted on 6/18/21 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

The answer to the problem is simple, don't apply for companies who do not list wage requirements if you dislike it, and stop asking the government to force them to.


This is the entire solution.

If you are applying to a company/position and don't know enough about them, to the level that the pay range is a question, then you are going to have a lot more surprises to come.
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
68786 posts
Posted on 6/18/21 at 12:44 pm to
Love this idea. If a job doesn't post the salary online that is an immediate red flag
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
263209 posts
Posted on 6/18/21 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

Love this idea




"Lets force business to do what we want because it inconveniences me."

Very progressive of you.
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
68786 posts
Posted on 6/18/21 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

"Lets force business to do what we want because it inconveniences me."

Very progressive of you.
Yep. Saves people and the business a lot of time. Imagine having someone take up your time and when you tell them the salary in the interview, they are no longer interested in the position. You've wasted time and money by not listing the salary online.

It makes no logical sense why businesses wouldn't do this.
Jump to page
Page First 4 5 6 7 8 ... 14
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 14Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram