- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Co- worker has been paying child support for five years,just found out the baby isn’t his
Posted on 1/25/19 at 10:41 am to fr33manator
Posted on 1/25/19 at 10:41 am to fr33manator
quote:
Sure you could. Lock her in a tower for 9 months
"He gonna de-flower her in the tower"
1
Posted on 1/25/19 at 10:42 am to rt3
Drekkinggarhylur...the solution
Posted on 1/25/19 at 10:43 am to BowDownToLSU
It would take every ounce of will power not to choke a bitch.
Posted on 1/25/19 at 10:45 am to BowDownToLSU
quote:
Another co -worker said he is still on the hook until she is 18 since he had signed an admission of paternity
Unfortunately, he's probably still going to be on the hook. The law tends to favor the welfare of the child over anything else, and a loss of child support would have a large negative impact on the child.
It's an extremely unfair burden on the male who signs an admission of paternity without knowledge he is not the father, but the courts deem that the welfare of the child supersedes his burden.
Posted on 1/25/19 at 10:45 am to BowDownToLSU
He’s screwed.
There was a pretty famous case of a serviceman whose GF got knocked up and he married her only to find out it wasn’t his and she was banking on him dying in Iraq to get his survivor benefits.
It was ruled he took too long to dispute paternity and had accepted the child as his own, so he was on the hook for the kid.
There was a pretty famous case of a serviceman whose GF got knocked up and he married her only to find out it wasn’t his and she was banking on him dying in Iraq to get his survivor benefits.
It was ruled he took too long to dispute paternity and had accepted the child as his own, so he was on the hook for the kid.
Posted on 1/25/19 at 10:46 am to fr33manator
quote:
The dog did it!
Posted on 1/25/19 at 10:47 am to BowDownToLSU
I had a good friend this happened to. He found out when the lil girl was 2, that she wasn't his. It destroyed him for years.
Posted on 1/25/19 at 10:48 am to BowDownToLSU
Your co-worker is an idiot.
Posted on 1/25/19 at 10:48 am to teke184
quote:
There was a pretty famous case of a serviceman whose GF got knocked up and he married her only to find out it wasn’t his and she was banking on him dying in Iraq to get his survivor benefits. It was ruled he took too long to dispute paternity and had accepted the child as his own, so he was on the hook for the kid.
Holy shite
We need a Gillette ad to shine light on this issue.
Posted on 1/25/19 at 10:56 am to BowDownToLSU
DISCLAIMER: The materials in this post are for informational purposes only and are not legal advice. Use of this post does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and this poster. You should not act upon the information in this post without seeking advice from a lawyer licensed in your own state or country. Please note that you should not send any confidential information pertaining to potential legal services to this poster until you have received written agreement from this poster to perform the legal services you requested. Unless you have received such written confirmation, this poster will not consider any correspondence you send to this poster as confidential.
quote:LINK ]
Can a party cancel an acknowledgment?
An authentic act of acknowledgment may be canceled without cause under the following conditions (whichever comes first):
A person who signed an acknowledgment may ask the court to cancel the acknowledgment upon proof of fraud, duress, material mistake of fact or error, or that the person is not the biological parent of the child. An acknowledgment cannot be canceled without a court hearing.
This post was edited on 1/25/19 at 11:01 am
Posted on 1/25/19 at 11:00 am to Salviati
DISCLAIMER: The materials in this post are for informational purposes only and are not legal advice. Use of this post does not create an attorney-client relationship between you and this poster. You should not act upon the information in this post without seeking advice from a lawyer licensed in your own state or country. Please note that you should not send any confidential information pertaining to potential legal services to this poster until you have received written agreement from this poster to perform the legal services you requested. Unless you have received such written confirmation, this poster will not consider any correspondence you send to this poster as confidential.
quote:
2006 Louisiana Laws - RS 9:406 — Revocation of authentic act; with and without cause
§406. Revocation of authentic act; with and without cause
A. A person who executed an authentic act of acknowledgment may, without cause, revoke it before the earlier of:
(1) Sixty days of the signing of the authentic act of acknowledgment in a judicial hearing for the limited purpose of revoking the acknowledgment or declaration.
(2) A judicial hearing relating to the child, including a child support proceeding, wherein the affiant to the authentic act of acknowledgment is a party to the proceeding.
B. At any time, a person who executed an authentic act of acknowledgment may petition the court to rescind such acknowledgment only upon proof, by clear and convincing evidence, that such act was induced by fraud, duress, material mistake of fact or error, or that the person is not the biological parent of the child.
C. Except for good cause shown, the court shall not suspend during the pendency of this proceeding any legal obligations, including a support obligation, of the person who petitions the court to revoke or rescind the authentic act of acknowledgment under this Section.
Acts 2006, No. 344, §4, eff. June 13, 2006.
Posted on 1/25/19 at 11:08 am to Napoleon
quote:
If he loves the kid, he should keep paying though.
His love for the kid isn't contingent on honoring an agreement that is fraudulent at its core.
Posted on 1/25/19 at 11:12 am to Napoleon
quote:
The question is, does the girl consider him her/his father?
Does the coworker love the kid?
These are the only two questions. If he raised the kid as his own what does it matter at this point? Imagine explaining to the kid dad doesn’t love you anymore because of a dna test. Mom was trashy for cheating but I’d look down on the Dad even more for abandoning what has been his child up until this point.
Posted on 1/25/19 at 11:15 am to BowDownToLSU
quote:
Pics of wife?
quote:
I’ve seen her and you wouldn’t want too.
On my behalf and that of the OT, I kindly decline the suggestion and reassert the request for a self-assessment.
Posted on 1/25/19 at 11:15 am to Muthsera
quote:
I'm not saying I would have killed her...but I understand.
What about what the mans accustomed to? I accustomed to her sucking my dick 3 nights a week. She can have the baby, but I want some pussy payments.
Posted on 1/25/19 at 11:16 am to BowDownToLSU
quote:
He’s going to get an attorney. Another co -worker said he is still on the hook until she is 18 since he had signed an admission of paternity
What an idiot.
Posted on 1/25/19 at 11:17 am to baldona
quote:
He better hire a dang good attorney.
Doesn't matter, no attorney can help at this point, the court will determine what's in the best interest of the child. Unless the biological father agrees to step in, he's stuck like Chuck.
Posted on 1/25/19 at 11:18 am to DavidTheGnome
quote:
Mom was trashy for cheating but I’d look down on the Dad even more for abandoning what has been his child up until this point.
I think one can still fight this fraudulent legal decision while not abandoning ones' child.
I mean the point isn't abandoning, rather it's about not paying some whore a monthly sum to distribute at her discretion, right?
Posted on 1/25/19 at 11:20 am to BowDownToLSU
I'm going to say something controversial and hope I don't get a PM
These types of situations - fathers losing their children to terribly difficult mothers or in this case, by a mother lying for years - is why from time to time we see murder suicide stories on TV. In those cases, we almost always jump on the man for not having more guts. But if a man loves his child and feels he is having that love stripped away by a court or by a lie, well... Sometimes I get it. I wouldn't want to see it happen to a family, but honestly, I get it. Men snap when their minds feel there's nothung left to lose.
Women and courts need to take care of dads much better than they do in this situation. I imagine the OP/Friend is losing his mind.
Posted on 1/25/19 at 11:23 am to Sao
quote:
if a man loves his child and feels he is having that love stripped away by a court or by a lie, well... Sometimes I get it. I wouldn't want to see it happen to a family, but honestly, I get it. Men snap when their minds feel there's nothung left to lose.
quote:
courts need to take care of dads much better
everything you said is the reality of the family court system, I'm convinced that the perpetual screwing over of men by the family court is the sole reason there are metal detectors in court houses
Page 4 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News