Started By
Message

Clancy's attorney argued today there is insufficient evidence that she killed her kids

Posted on 9/29/26 at 2:00 pm
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
132771 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 2:00 pm
Despite repeatedly saying during the trial that she definitely did

Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
132771 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 2:00 pm to
Posted by aubiecat
Alabama
Member since Jul 2011
6132 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 2:02 pm to
If you are a piece of shite murderer, you want a piece of shite lawyer like this one backing you up.
This post was edited on 9/29/26 at 2:18 pm
Posted by CocomoLSU
Inside your dome.
Member since Feb 2004
157643 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 2:03 pm to
What a fricking dog and pony show at this point. Good Lord.


ETA: Shouldn't his earlier remarks be on the record and be able to be used against him now? Seems like something that should be fairly easy to argue against (although I know it's not).
This post was edited on 9/29/26 at 2:13 pm
Posted by Purple Spoon
Hoth
Member since Feb 2005
21538 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 2:08 pm to
This dude is a slimy piece of shite.


Does he have a card I can hold on to?
Posted by JetsetNuggs
Member since Jun 2014
15673 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 2:10 pm to
that juror becomes more of a hero with every day that passes
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
62738 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 2:12 pm to
He knows that he has a boatload of insane women supporting his client, and those women would likely resort to violence in short order.

Completely contradicting your argument from a just concluded mistrial should definitely be overlooked by the 2026 justice system.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
484041 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 2:15 pm to
Lawyers arguments won't be permitted as facts

They stipulated in the last trial that she killed her kids. Curious if they can withdraw it for the next one or if this is puffery

Arguing she didn't kill her kids puts more likely to be convicted
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
132771 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 2:16 pm to
quote:

They stipulated in the last trial that she killed her kids. Curious if they can withdraw it for the next one or if this is puffery


Its an entirely new trial, so it seems to me they could, but I do not know for sure
Posted by Wraytex
San Antonio - Gonzales
Member since Jun 2020
4403 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 2:18 pm to
Based dads installing smoke detector/hidden cameras in every room.
Posted by Tigersforthee
Member since Dec 2025
388 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 2:22 pm to
I can see why leftist women are lined up to fellate him.
Posted by tylercsbn9
Cypress, TX
Member since Feb 2004
67468 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

Arguing she didn't kill her kids puts more likely to be convicted


That’s what I was wondering. Is he seriously ditching the psychosis defense and going to straight argue she didn’t do it at all? Seems like a stupid direction to go.
Posted by jdd48
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2012
24195 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 3:09 pm to
Isn't pleading insanity by definition an admission of committing the act?
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
62738 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 3:10 pm to
quote:

They stipulated in the last trial that she killed her kids. Curious if they can withdraw it for the next one or if this is puffery


So, legally, the stipulations put forth by the defense itself can be withdrawn and everyone is supposed to pretend it never happened?
Posted by duckblind56
South of Ellick
Member since Sep 2023
6147 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

SlowFlowPro


Take a stab at this for me please.

How does any person, even if they only have a single molecule of a moral compass justify defending someone like Clancy?

That POS knows damn well she murdered those children and yet he stands before God and man and defends her actions. ????
Posted by High C
viewing the fall....
Member since Nov 2012
62738 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 3:18 pm to
quote:

That POS knows damn well she murdered those children and yet he stands before God and man and defends her actions. ????


A very big reason that I changed my mind about going to law school during my freshman year of college. Not the only one, I realize the different types of law that can be practiced. They all seem to have this component in one way or another, though.
Posted by awestruck
Member since Jan 2015
15019 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

So even her lawyer now wants her convicted.

Foul woman indeed.
Posted by saturday
Pronoun (Baw)
Member since Feb 2007
8077 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

Based dads installing smoke detector/hidden cameras in every room.




I didnt marry a psychopath, my baw.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
484041 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 3:32 pm to
quote:

So, legally, the stipulations put forth by the defense itself can be withdrawn and everyone is supposed to pretend it never happened?

In that case, yes. Jurors' decisions must be ONLY based in the record of the trial.
Posted by HangmanPage1
Wild West
Member since Aug 2021
2299 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 4:56 pm to
Jury selection for the next trial is going to be it’s on Netflix documentary
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram