
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Clancy's attorney argued today there is insufficient evidence that she killed her kids
Posted on 9/29/26 at 7:41 pm to Fun Bunch
Posted on 9/29/26 at 7:41 pm to Fun Bunch
I was told by countless women on facebook today that the Cornell 7 r@pe case suspects are already guilty without a trial and deserve the max sentencing. Wonder if the same fits for Clancy 
Posted on 9/29/26 at 7:42 pm to Fun Bunch
Hes retarded. You cant calim insanity defense, qithout admitting guilt.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 7:43 pm to duckblind56
quote:
Take a stab at this for me please.
How does any person, even if they only have a single molecule of a moral compass justify defending someone like Clancy?
That POS knows damn well she murdered those children and yet he stands before God and man and defends her actions. ????
I'd do it.
It's a constitutional right. And ineffective assistance of counsel is major grounds for appeal.
Anyone that wants justice for the children should agree.
The ire should be at the Commonwealth of Massachusetts for their NGRI statute. She should be in prison for life unquestionably.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 7:46 pm to Fun Bunch
Reddington needs to worry about the lawsuit from the lone juror for leaking enough of that information (his gender narrowed it to one in three) in public court.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 7:51 pm to Fun Bunch
Best reply I've read.....
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
If she didn’t kill her kids then what is she blaming her doctors and the medical profession for?
Posted on 9/29/26 at 8:05 pm to John_V
quote:
was told by countless women on facebook today that the Cornell 7 r@pe case suspects are already guilty without a trial and deserve the max sentencing. Wonder if the same fits for Clancy
By their own standard they can just say the horniness but them in an altered state of mind and oopsie poopsie. No woman can dare question what it's like to be a man down bad and how it FEELS
This post was edited on 9/29/26 at 8:06 pm
Posted on 9/29/26 at 8:14 pm to Fun Bunch
Oh geez...here comes 4th wave of feminism to defend this crazy ho even more.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 8:17 pm to duckblind56
quote:
How does any person, even if they only have a single molecule of a moral compass justify defending someone like Clancy?
It’s a foundational tenet of our judicial system.
It’s a tough one for sure. But you can also think of it less as trying to get a guilty person off and more of making sure the state meets their burden of proof. It’s a check on the government.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 8:25 pm to aubiecat
She admitted that she murdered them, right?
Posted on 9/29/26 at 8:33 pm to Wayne Campbell
quote:
But you can also think of it less as trying to get a guilty person off and more of making sure the state meets their burden of proof. It’s a check on the government.
This is it.
Let’s be real, almost everyone in these situations is guilty. But if not for rigid defense attorneys that wouldn’t be the case in the first place.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 8:35 pm to Wayne Campbell
quote:
It’s a foundational tenet of our judicial system. It’s a tough one for sure. But you can also think of it less as trying to get a guilty person off and more of making sure the state meets their burden of proof. It’s a check on the government.
Absolutely. The people who didn't follow the trial and want her buried under the prison are as bad as the pink sweater chicks who think she's innocent because of her hormones.
I went into this trial thinking she was likely guilty. During the testimony, a different picture came to light at the hands of the defense and the prosecution, to include inconsistencies in Patrick's own version of the events.
The truth is Lindsay was never questioned the night of the murders because she physically couldn't speak and was nearly dead. She woke up after several days in a coma handcuffed to a hospital bed and informed of what she had done. The police took Patrick's 45-minute absence from the house as a solid alibi and ran with it despite it being completely plausible for him to have done most of it before he left the house. The "facts" in this case don't gee-haw.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 8:46 pm to Fun Bunch
He's not saying she did not do it today as if he was reversing course. If you look at a continuation of the CourtTV clip, he goes on to suggest, there was not enough evidence left for her to know she did it at the time, which in my opinion he's still circling back to her pyschosis defense.
Regardless of what they do with her, I wouldn't wanna be in her shoes even if she goes to a pysche ward and gets rehabilitated. She's thrown away a good career. She's paralyzed . She threw away her family, her kids, a husband. She's got a lot of mental and emotional torture ahead. The scary thing is so many women are rooting her on b/c they've had the same feelings about their family
Regardless of what they do with her, I wouldn't wanna be in her shoes even if she goes to a pysche ward and gets rehabilitated. She's thrown away a good career. She's paralyzed . She threw away her family, her kids, a husband. She's got a lot of mental and emotional torture ahead. The scary thing is so many women are rooting her on b/c they've had the same feelings about their family
Posted on 9/29/26 at 8:53 pm to duckblind56
In reality, the only reason she doesn’t have a public defender on her side is because of the media. Scummy defense attorneys take the job for advertising which in itself is even worse.
This post was edited on 9/29/26 at 8:54 pm
Posted on 9/29/26 at 9:00 pm to JetsetNuggs
quote:
that juror becomes more of a hero with every day that passes
The scumbag defense attorney is trying to get his texts and communications pulled. That’s straight up juror intimidation
Posted on 9/29/26 at 9:24 pm to Fun Bunch
We are so far beyond ensuring every accused gets a fair trial.
Posted on 9/29/26 at 9:26 pm to Fun Bunch
That broad and her lawyer are crazier than a shithouse rat.

Popular
Back to top


1












