Started By
Message

re: Clancy's attorney argued today there is insufficient evidence that she killed her kids

Posted on 9/29/26 at 7:41 pm to
Posted by John_V
SELA
Member since Oct 2018
2089 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 7:41 pm to
I was told by countless women on facebook today that the Cornell 7 r@pe case suspects are already guilty without a trial and deserve the max sentencing. Wonder if the same fits for Clancy
Posted by ChatGPT of LA
Member since Mar 2023
8254 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 7:42 pm to
Hes retarded. You cant calim insanity defense, qithout admitting guilt.
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
80901 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 7:43 pm to
quote:

Take a stab at this for me please.

How does any person, even if they only have a single molecule of a moral compass justify defending someone like Clancy?

That POS knows damn well she murdered those children and yet he stands before God and man and defends her actions. ????


I'd do it.

It's a constitutional right. And ineffective assistance of counsel is major grounds for appeal.

Anyone that wants justice for the children should agree.

The ire should be at the Commonwealth of Massachusetts for their NGRI statute. She should be in prison for life unquestionably.
Posted by Rouge
Floston Paradise
Member since Oct 2004
138908 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 7:46 pm to
Reddington needs to worry about the lawsuit from the lone juror for leaking enough of that information (his gender narrowed it to one in three) in public court.
Posted by East Coast Band
Member since Nov 2010
67209 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 7:51 pm to
Best reply I've read.....
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

quote:

If she didn’t kill her kids then what is she blaming her doctors and the medical profession for?
Posted by Gusoline
Jacksonville, NC
Member since Dec 2013
11233 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 8:05 pm to
quote:

was told by countless women on facebook today that the Cornell 7 r@pe case suspects are already guilty without a trial and deserve the max sentencing. Wonder if the same fits for Clancy


By their own standard they can just say the horniness but them in an altered state of mind and oopsie poopsie. No woman can dare question what it's like to be a man down bad and how it FEELS
This post was edited on 9/29/26 at 8:06 pm
Posted by tigafan4life
Member since Dec 2006
51242 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 8:14 pm to
Oh geez...here comes 4th wave of feminism to defend this crazy ho even more.
Posted by Wayne Campbell
Aurora, IL
Member since Oct 2011
7544 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 8:17 pm to
quote:

How does any person, even if they only have a single molecule of a moral compass justify defending someone like Clancy?


It’s a foundational tenet of our judicial system.

It’s a tough one for sure. But you can also think of it less as trying to get a guilty person off and more of making sure the state meets their burden of proof. It’s a check on the government.
Posted by BPTiger
Atlanta
Member since Oct 2011
6350 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 8:25 pm to
She admitted that she murdered them, right?
Posted by FutureCorridor49
US 90
Member since May 2023
661 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 8:33 pm to
quote:

But you can also think of it less as trying to get a guilty person off and more of making sure the state meets their burden of proof. It’s a check on the government.


This is it.

Let’s be real, almost everyone in these situations is guilty. But if not for rigid defense attorneys that wouldn’t be the case in the first place.
Posted by HouseMom
Member since Jun 2020
2010 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 8:35 pm to
quote:

It’s a foundational tenet of our judicial system. It’s a tough one for sure. But you can also think of it less as trying to get a guilty person off and more of making sure the state meets their burden of proof. It’s a check on the government.


Absolutely. The people who didn't follow the trial and want her buried under the prison are as bad as the pink sweater chicks who think she's innocent because of her hormones.

I went into this trial thinking she was likely guilty. During the testimony, a different picture came to light at the hands of the defense and the prosecution, to include inconsistencies in Patrick's own version of the events.

The truth is Lindsay was never questioned the night of the murders because she physically couldn't speak and was nearly dead. She woke up after several days in a coma handcuffed to a hospital bed and informed of what she had done. The police took Patrick's 45-minute absence from the house as a solid alibi and ran with it despite it being completely plausible for him to have done most of it before he left the house. The "facts" in this case don't gee-haw.
Posted by carguymatt
Member since Aug 1998
Member since Jun 2015
1163 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 8:46 pm to
He's not saying she did not do it today as if he was reversing course. If you look at a continuation of the CourtTV clip, he goes on to suggest, there was not enough evidence left for her to know she did it at the time, which in my opinion he's still circling back to her pyschosis defense.

Regardless of what they do with her, I wouldn't wanna be in her shoes even if she goes to a pysche ward and gets rehabilitated. She's thrown away a good career. She's paralyzed . She threw away her family, her kids, a husband. She's got a lot of mental and emotional torture ahead. The scary thing is so many women are rooting her on b/c they've had the same feelings about their family
Posted by dkreller
Laffy
Member since Jan 2009
34485 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 8:53 pm to
In reality, the only reason she doesn’t have a public defender on her side is because of the media. Scummy defense attorneys take the job for advertising which in itself is even worse.
This post was edited on 9/29/26 at 8:54 pm
Posted by jcaz
Laffy
Member since Aug 2014
19556 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 9:00 pm to
quote:

that juror becomes more of a hero with every day that passes

The scumbag defense attorney is trying to get his texts and communications pulled. That’s straight up juror intimidation
Posted by biglego
San Francisco
Member since Nov 2007
85908 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 9:24 pm to
We are so far beyond ensuring every accused gets a fair trial.
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
104579 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 9:25 pm to
Posted by hometownhero89
Center of the Earth
Member since Aug 2007
2171 posts
Posted on 9/29/26 at 9:26 pm to
That broad and her lawyer are crazier than a shithouse rat.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram