1
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:32 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
You know you've lost when you resort to one word answer leading questions
Hold up, the person I'm responding to said this is a trial about her mental state at the time of the murders. The truth is the jury can just say she's not guilty at all. I didn't make this up.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:35 am to HouseMom
quote:
The truth is the jury can just say she's not guilty at all.
They could also say frick you judge eat shite. Equal chance of them saying straight not guilty. This case has made some women literally retarded. The nuance has been explained to you by several, you choose not to hear it. Don't reproduce and don't vote please.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:36 am to HouseMom
quote:
Yes or no. The jury can come back with a plain "not guilty."
Sure all 12 people can disregard the facts and evidence, including the stipulations that she actually did it and find her plainly not guilty. If you want your "umm actually" moment, take it, but that isn't an option even worth discussing.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:36 am to LNCHBOX
Dude you are being insane
It’s 100% an option for the jury to have a straight not guilty. The judge read it in the jury instructions
Some of y’all freak out over anything.
It’s 100% an option for the jury to have a straight not guilty. The judge read it in the jury instructions
Some of y’all freak out over anything.
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 9:37 am
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:37 am to lionward2014
A mom on Tuesday in Illinois just killed her kid in her home and then attempted suicide. This shite is getting crazy.
KPTV.com
KPTV.com
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:38 am to lsupride87
quote:
It’s 100% an option for the jury to have a straight not guilty.
Glad to see you have the reading comprehension of a retarded female.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:42 am to LNCHBOX
quote:What comprehension is missing from the start of the conversation where this was posted
Glad to see you have the reading comprehension of a retarded female.
quote:
The only not guilty option is not guilt by reason of insanity. To give you a quick 1L course crimes contain two parts, mens rea and actus reas. There is no doubt, and it was admitted to, that she did the action (actus reus) but what is up for debate is if she is legally culpable because of her mental state to be found guilty of the crime (mens rea). So no there is no option of "not guilty" because she didn't do it, that is a fantasy of crazy women online.
It’s just wrong. Just factually wrong. Downvote and get mad but it’s wrong as can be
There is 100% without a doubt an option for a straight not guilty
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 9:43 am
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:44 am to lsupride87
quote:
What comprehension is missing from the start of the conversation where this was posted
You really are insufferable twat.
quote:Again the nuance has been explained, but you're going to an argumentative fgt,. Knock yourself out.
It’s just wrong. Just factually wrong. Downvote and get made but it’s wrong as can be
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:45 am to lionward2014
quote:
Sure all 12 people can disregard the facts and evidence, including the stipulations that she actually did it and find her plainly not guilty.
The phenomenon of "jury nullification"
I can't imagine any jury nullification would be on the table here after they heard the 911 call
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:45 am to LNCHBOX
So the rumor is its the two younger chicks holding up the whole thing
Curious if it's the same two women who showed up wearing pink earlier
Curious if it's the same two women who showed up wearing pink earlier
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:48 am to stout
quote:
So the rumor is its the two younger chicks holding up the whole thing
Wouldn't be surprising.
quote:
Curious if it's the same two women who showed up wearing pink earlier
Definitely wouldn't be surprising
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:48 am to rt3
It is technically an option but with both defense and prosecution basically agreeing that she did it and it wasn’t self defense, the options are NGBRI, manslaughter (which is fricked up), and murder.
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 9:50 am
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:49 am to stout
That rumor is fabricated. Polymarket twitter kinda sucks.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:49 am to rt3
quote:
I can't imagine any jury nullification would be on the table here after they heard the 911 call
I read the transcript last night and legit teared up for a minute. I don't think I could physically take listening to the call.
ETA: Isn't it confirmed that there are at least 9 or 10 jurors who want to convict? A not guilty verdict is nonsensical to think of as an option at this point. A hung jury is possible. Not sure some of the loonies on social media following this know the difference though.
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 9:53 am
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:50 am to ell_13
quote:
It is technically an option but with both defense and prosecution basically agreeing that she did it and it was self defense, the options are NGBRI, manslaughter (which is fricked up), and murder.
If the two young pink wearers truly are part of the tik tok parade, I would absolutely not take off a straight not guilty from them
It’s a big if, but if they truly are part of that cult then that’s absolutely possible that’s what they are arguing
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 9:51 am
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:51 am to lionward2014
quote:
I read the transcript last night and legit teared up for a minute. I don't think I could physically take listening to the call.
I read the transcript too
I'd be seeing red if I heard it & the case was on my shoulders
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:51 am to lsupride87
I wish the algorithm would present all the folks debunking all of the nonsense that they’re getting fed.
Crazy people are so against getting their thoughts and feelings challenged. Stubbornness is wild.
Crazy people are so against getting their thoughts and feelings challenged. Stubbornness is wild.
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:53 am to lsupride87
quote:
If the two young pink wearers truly are part of the tik tok parade, I would absolutely not take off a straight not guilty from them
It’s a big if, but if they truly are part of that cult then that’s absolutely possible that’s what they are arguing
Then 1 way or another... this case is headed for mistrial
Whether it be due to a standard hung jury
Or due to deliberating jurors using sources the judge has told them to avoid (which could get the jurors in question in trouble with the court)
This post was edited on 9/3/26 at 9:55 am
Posted on 9/3/26 at 9:57 am to rt3
If this ends in a mistrial and is retried, can the defense change their strategy and try to go for a straight not guilty? And if so, can their strategy where they admitted in open court she did it in this trial be used against them in that case?
These feel like stupid questions, but in a world where she wasn't immediately found guilty I've given up on common sense
These feel like stupid questions, but in a world where she wasn't immediately found guilty I've given up on common sense
Page 25 of 31
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News