4
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Clancy trial verdict predictions
Posted on 8/31/26 at 11:55 pm to StansberryRules
Posted on 8/31/26 at 11:55 pm to StansberryRules
quote:
Hung jury is my prediction. I don't see any way in hell 9 women from Massachusetts doesn't include at least a few lunatics
Seems like this is happening.
I'm guessing the majority are voting to convict and there are 2-4 crazy women who are completed brainwashed and dug in.
If it goes down that way they'll have to retry and fight like hell to prevent the jury being 75% female in the first place.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 7:51 am to StansberryRules
The trial is just providing more and more evidence that women should not be judges or hold political office.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 7:54 am to StansberryRules
quote:
If it goes down that way they'll have to retry and fight like hell to prevent the jury being 75% female in the first place.
How was this allowed?
Posted on 9/1/26 at 7:56 am to Oilfieldbiology
Posted on 9/1/26 at 7:58 am to StansberryRules
quote:
hung jury
That is my guess.
This is (I think) the charge about what the prosecution has to prove beyond reasonable doubt.
quote:
That if the defendant did suffer from a mental disease or defect, he nonetheless retained the substantial capacity to appreciate the wrongfulness or criminality of his conduct and[20] to conform his conduct to the requirements of the law;
You will find one or two that have some reasonable doubt about that on these facts.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 8:04 am to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
the jury being 75% female in the first place
quote:
How was this allowed?
This is from AI, but it seems right:
quote:
The Process: Judge William Sullivan oversaw the empanelment in Plymouth County Superior Court, aiming to seat a total of 18 jurors (12 primary deliberating jurors and 6 alternates) to account for potential attrition over the multi-week trial.
Depletion of Strikes: By the final stages of empanelment, the Commonwealth (prosecution) completely exhausted its allotment of 18 peremptory challenges.
Defense Remaining Strikes: The defense team, led by attorney Kevin Reddington, held onto 4 or 5 unused peremptory strikes by the time the final panel was nearly secured.
IF that is right, it was a defense-oriented venire to begin with, or the prosecution squandered its strikes, or both.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 8:59 am to JudgeHolden
They both knew the ground rules; the prosecution has bungled this from the start.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:06 am to ILurkThereforeIAm
How does one prove that a defendant was not incompetent at the time?
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:12 am to Hondo Blacksheep
I guess the pink could just be pink but I don't think so. Hung jury. This is the bullshite you get when you indoctrinate women their entire lives that killing babies is fine and they can't be held accountable for their own actions because of hormones.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:23 am to TigerMyth36
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:29 am to tiggerthetooth
Yeah the 3 dudes are voting guilty while the 9 women, well u know where they stand
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:32 am to tiggerthetooth
Wow
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:40 am to tiggerthetooth
Those women jurors might was well go dig up those children's corpses and piss on them. That's the level of compassion they have for them.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:42 am to DrrTiger
That woman is a registered delivery nurse and killed her babies with her bare hands.
This is fricking unreal that she is not convicted yet.
This is fricking unreal that she is not convicted yet.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:47 am to loogaroo
So if no decision is made it’s a hung jury and a brand new trial?
This should be 12-0 guilty btw, my guess is the 3 men and maybe 1-2 women are going guilty and the other women are all not guilty.
The amount of women I’ve seen on my Facebook feed saying the husband did it or that she did it but shouldn’t be guilty is absolutely crazy.
This should be 12-0 guilty btw, my guess is the 3 men and maybe 1-2 women are going guilty and the other women are all not guilty.
The amount of women I’ve seen on my Facebook feed saying the husband did it or that she did it but shouldn’t be guilty is absolutely crazy.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:47 am to loogaroo
I guess some of the Jurors don't look at this as "murder" but rather Post Partum Abortion and Massachusetts is a pro abortion state.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:50 am to Hondo Blacksheep
quote:
How does one prove that a defendant was not incompetent at the time?
In this particular case they tried to show her planning the crime out... like mapping out how long she had once Patrick left to go to CVS & get dinner before returning home
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:53 am to The Egg
quote:
There's no way there aren't at least 4 or 5 sympathetic jurors of the 9 women there
The news I saw didn't say how many women showed up for jury duty wearing pink in support of her.
Only said "several".
This case has brought out the worst in the "modern woman".
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:57 am to Wolfwireless
This will be re-tried down the line, and the prosecution will bring in much heavier hitters
the fervor for her will calm down, and things like the 911 call will leak
They will get her on the 2nd try, its an old tale
the fervor for her will calm down, and things like the 911 call will leak
They will get her on the 2nd try, its an old tale
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:58 am to Wolfwireless
Apologies if this isn't correct because I haven't followed this case closely, but is it true that this jury wasn't sequestered?
It's crazy to me that they could've easily been reading the same batshit internet theories and takes that everyone else has during this process.
If that's the case, would the judge have been able to sequester them once it became clear this case was a national frenzy?
It's crazy to me that they could've easily been reading the same batshit internet theories and takes that everyone else has during this process.
If that's the case, would the judge have been able to sequester them once it became clear this case was a national frenzy?
Page 10 of 31
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News