Started By
Message

re: Clancy trial verdict predictions

Posted on 8/31/26 at 8:41 pm to
Posted by MorbidTheClown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
76935 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 8:41 pm to
Jurors showed up in pink? Wtf?
Posted by CrimsonTideMD
Member since Dec 2010
7129 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 9:05 pm to
quote:

No one thinks that she’s innocent


Thousands of women around the country believe the husband framed her.

Posted by UltimaParadox
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2008
53107 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 9:48 pm to
quote:

Thousands of women around the country believe the husband framed her.


quote:

over one-fourth of Americans believe 9/11 was an inside job


I mean the math seems low
Posted by StansberryRules
Member since Aug 2024
5867 posts
Posted on 8/31/26 at 11:55 pm to
quote:

Hung jury is my prediction. I don't see any way in hell 9 women from Massachusetts doesn't include at least a few lunatics


Seems like this is happening.

I'm guessing the majority are voting to convict and there are 2-4 crazy women who are completed brainwashed and dug in.

If it goes down that way they'll have to retry and fight like hell to prevent the jury being 75% female in the first place.
Posted by rented mule
Member since Sep 2005
2829 posts
Posted on 9/1/26 at 7:51 am to
The trial is just providing more and more evidence that women should not be judges or hold political office.
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
43063 posts
Posted on 9/1/26 at 7:54 am to
quote:

If it goes down that way they'll have to retry and fight like hell to prevent the jury being 75% female in the first place.


How was this allowed?
Posted by OU Guy
Member since Feb 2022
33902 posts
Posted on 9/1/26 at 7:56 am to
Posted by JudgeHolden
Gila River
Member since Jan 2008
18989 posts
Posted on 9/1/26 at 7:58 am to
quote:

hung jury


That is my guess.

This is (I think) the charge about what the prosecution has to prove beyond reasonable doubt.


quote:

That if the defendant did suffer from a mental disease or defect, he nonetheless retained the substantial capacity to appreciate the wrongfulness or criminality of his conduct and[20] to conform his conduct to the requirements of the law;


You will find one or two that have some reasonable doubt about that on these facts.
Posted by JudgeHolden
Gila River
Member since Jan 2008
18989 posts
Posted on 9/1/26 at 8:04 am to
quote:

the jury being 75% female in the first place


quote:

How was this allowed?


This is from AI, but it seems right:

quote:

The Process: Judge William Sullivan oversaw the empanelment in Plymouth County Superior Court, aiming to seat a total of 18 jurors (12 primary deliberating jurors and 6 alternates) to account for potential attrition over the multi-week trial.

Depletion of Strikes: By the final stages of empanelment, the Commonwealth (prosecution) completely exhausted its allotment of 18 peremptory challenges.

Defense Remaining Strikes: The defense team, led by attorney Kevin Reddington, held onto 4 or 5 unused peremptory strikes by the time the final panel was nearly secured.


IF that is right, it was a defense-oriented venire to begin with, or the prosecution squandered its strikes, or both.
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
80866 posts
Posted on 9/1/26 at 8:59 am to
They both knew the ground rules; the prosecution has bungled this from the start.
Posted by Hondo Blacksheep
Member since Jul 2022
3616 posts
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:06 am to
How does one prove that a defendant was not incompetent at the time?
Posted by TigerMyth36
River Ridge
Member since Nov 2005
41856 posts
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:12 am to
I guess the pink could just be pink but I don't think so. Hung jury. This is the bullshite you get when you indoctrinate women their entire lives that killing babies is fine and they can't be held accountable for their own actions because of hormones.
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
64793 posts
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:23 am to
Posted by The Egg
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2004
84046 posts
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:29 am to
Yeah the 3 dudes are voting guilty while the 9 women, well u know where they stand
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
61343 posts
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:32 am to
Wow
Posted by DrrTiger
Gulf of America
Member since Nov 2023
2742 posts
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:40 am to
Those women jurors might was well go dig up those children's corpses and piss on them. That's the level of compassion they have for them.
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
43835 posts
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:42 am to
That woman is a registered delivery nurse and killed her babies with her bare hands.

This is fricking unreal that she is not convicted yet.
Posted by tWildcat
Verona, KY
Member since Oct 2014
20287 posts
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:47 am to
So if no decision is made it’s a hung jury and a brand new trial?

This should be 12-0 guilty btw, my guess is the 3 men and maybe 1-2 women are going guilty and the other women are all not guilty.

The amount of women I’ve seen on my Facebook feed saying the husband did it or that she did it but shouldn’t be guilty is absolutely crazy.
Posted by CU_Tigers4life
Georgia
Member since Aug 2013
9502 posts
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:47 am to
I guess some of the Jurors don't look at this as "murder" but rather Post Partum Abortion and Massachusetts is a pro abortion state.
Posted by rt3
now in the piney woods of Pineville
Member since Apr 2011
148138 posts
Posted on 9/1/26 at 9:50 am to
quote:

How does one prove that a defendant was not incompetent at the time?

In this particular case they tried to show her planning the crime out... like mapping out how long she had once Patrick left to go to CVS & get dinner before returning home
Jump to page
Page First 8 9 10 11 12 ... 31
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 10 of 31Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram